FL Studio Is the Most Buzzed-About Music Software…

Screen shot 2014-02-21 at 2.26.21 PM

If you need help deciding which music software to dive into, this may help.

Digital Music Doctor, a company that creates pro audio video courses, has released their “Music Software Popularity Index”. They measure in terms of online buzz, not sales. The data is pulled from internet search activity and engagement on social networks (not from likes and follows). Read more about how the data is pulled here.

 

Buzz in the fourth quarter of 2013 is shown in yellow, compared to the software’s annual average in green.

91 Responses

  1. Randow

    This is a really silly premise. I think FL Studio is that thing that teenagers use and download for free?

    Reply
    • Lynch

      Yupp. It’s what most of the teenage kids who can’t afford to purchase a decent DAW use.

      Ableton and Pro Tools make perfect sense. One is the primary choice for electronic home-producers, and the other is industry standard in professional recording studios.

      Reply
      • FL Studio is Here

        Ever heard of Avicii, Afrojack, rmin van Buuren, Deadmau5, Brian Transeru, Porter Robinson, Feed Me, Madeon, Bass Hunter, Ephixa, Savant, Seven Lions, Cazzette, Boi1-DA, The Flashbulb (Benn Jordan), Sarom Soundz, Jay Frog, Tritonal, Maor Levi, Tom Swoon, Dot Rotten, Ummet Ozcan, Tristiam, Bare, Camo & Krooked.. plus 100′s of other professional artists and producers are all using FL Studio. You guys are simply ignorant.

        Reply
        • a young bedroom producer

          YES!! FL is the thing I use to make music. More like it when I found out that most of my favorite producers uses FL. It’s really a good thing to try on if you think that: You can’t try Logic Pro because you can”t afford a Mac and it don’t have a demo version. Ableton feels complicated. Cubase is way too expensive and don’t have that money and the drive space for that nearly GB installer (is that right?).

          All above are only my personal opinion. And, a full, official, working version of FL for Mac is in developing. You can download a wrapped version or the beta(unstable, developer) of FL for Mac at Image-Line’s website.

          Reply
        • joe

          hit boi got grammies and all he uses is fl studio lmao wtf are yall talkin about… Ableton and protools do the same thing as fl studio in different ways.

          Reply
      • Louis Valencia

        Pro tools is rarely used in digital production. FL studio is widely under estimated by people who don’t know how to produce music.

        Fl studio hasn’t been known to include high quality native vst’s. This is true. Reason has excellent native vst’s and so does logic. But none of that really matters, because even though their vst’s are good, they are not as good as third party software companies such as Native Instruments or Arturia. Anything that can be made in ableton or logic can be made in Fl studio. The most important thing is optimizing your work flow for some people ableton does that. For me Fl studio does. Some people like to have their effects and plug-in options restrained to a bar under their timeline. I like to be able to switch between full screen piano rolls and my instrument rack, as well as a visual mixer that resembles a real life mixer. That is why I prefer to studio.

        http://Www.soundcloud.com/reanim8

        Reply
        • Nina Ulloa

          do you mean Pro Tools is rarely used in electronic production? because it’s definitely used outside of it. i think FL is widely underestimated by people who DO know how to produce music. i find that many producers assume FL is shitty / for people who don’t know what they’re doing.

          Reply
    • FL Studio is Here

      Ever heard of Avicii, Afrojack, Armin van Buuren, Deadmau5, Brian Transeru, Porter Robinson, Feed Me, Madeon, Bass Hunter, Ephixa, Savant, Seven Lions, Cazzette, Boi1-DA, The Flashbulb (Benn Jordan), Sarom Soundz, Jay Frog, Tritonal, Maor Levi, Tom Swoon, Dot Rotten, Ummet Ozcan, Tristiam, Bare, Camo & Krooked.. plus 100′s of other professional artists and producers are all using FL Studio. You are showing your ignorance. BTW this was also made in FL Studio – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo1HRc_BseA

      Reply
    • Bradley Peters

      Hahaha oh wow. Seriously? As someone who has used both Logic, Ableton and FL Studio, FL Studio is by far the better of all of them (mind you my opinion is bias). First off Logic is a mess. It makes the simplest tasks unnecessarily complicated which wastes time and kills the creativity buzz. The amount of manipulation in FL Studio’s piano roll is better than ANY OTHER DAW. The routing features and native plug ins are beyond exceptional and Maximus is probably the greatest thing ever conceived. You get life time free updates meaning you pay for it once. Image-Line offers great deals to its customers and they’re incredibly loyal and their customer support is exceptional, unlike Apple which primes itself and charging a 40% mark up on the exact same specs of its competing opposition (and Mac users think they’re better HA!) At the end of the day you use what ever works for you. I’ve composed, mixed and mastered tracks in FL Studio that stump Logic in quality. I constantly hear Logic users complain about updates crashing their programs and making certain vst plug ins malfunction. FL Studio has stepped up its game hard over the last few years.

      Reply
    • Mike

      I think many people disregard FL Studio for what it started out as. Fruity Loops, and was just a four-channel midi drum machine at that time. However, its first release was in 1998. A LOT of changes have been made to FL Studio in the nearly 20 years of its production. I’ve used many DAWs and have always found myself fond of FL Studio. Logic: Gave it a chance, but just not really a big Mac guy. I honestly don’t think the hardware is worth the money you pay. Didn’t really care for the workflow of Logic honestly. Ableton: Not a bad DAW, but not user friendly by any means. Cubase: Also a great DAW but the upgrades are almost half the price of the original version. For me, FL Studio is extremely user friendly, the workflow is well layed out and organized. Everything is sufficiently color-coded so it’s easier to make out your track layout (almost every DAW I know of has this, but I’m speaking on behalf of FL Studio). Channeling and effects layout is easy, click and drag really. The cost for the full bundle all presets and packages included is $737. I wouldn’t regard it as cheap software, at least not anymore, however, a really big plus to FL Studio is their lifetime of free upgrades. Unlike most DAWs where you’re required to pay $200-$300 for a new version. Many big name producers use FL Studio. If you don’t believe me, go to YouTube and search Future Music in the Studio. Martin Garrix, and Avicci, just to name a couple, both use FL Studio. The ability to make music is dependent on the producer. Not the DAW. If the producers music sounds like sh*t, which DAW you have isn’t going to make a difference. Which DAW you have is really personal preference for the reasons mentioned above.

      Reply
  2. ben

    FL is the best, fuck the rest!

    Ableton = minimal techno bullshit
    Pro Tools = gay hiphop
    Cubase = old dirty guys

    Reply
    • BitchesLoveMe

      …says the kid who doesn’t know what the fuck he’s talking about and assumes that DAWs are each limited to one particular style of production.

      Reply
    • Amazing

      Literally the most ridiculous comment I’ve ever read on this site.

      And that’s saying a lot.

      Reply
    • Esol Esek

      sorry, chump.

      Ableton Live is amazing for ANY kind of music, especially since the release of 9 and the updates in the Max for live plugins. I’d still recommend buying some plug-ins (U-He’s are amazing) on the synth side (they now compete with old analog keyboards). The new Convolution Reverb in Max is great.

      Live is actually quick and effective for multi-track recording of a drumkit and band, but then know-it-alls have trouble gathering great players together to rehearse and record.

      Reply
    • VJ

      I disagree with you. I’m a music production student at university, and have been creating music on FL Studio for over 5 years. It is by far my favourite daw. I also have Logic X, Pro Tools & Ableton. you can create any sort of music with these DAW’s. Yes the usability of FL Studio is piss easy compared to softwares such as Pro Tools and Logic, but they are industry standard softwares specifically made for audio recording. Pro Tools especially, which is why it’s considered as one of the most powerful DAWS for audio recording.

      Reply
    • FL Studio is Here

      Ever heard of Avicii, Afrojack, Armin van Buuren, Deadmau5, Brian Transeru, Porter Robinson, Feed Me, Madeon, Bass Hunter, Ephixa, Savant, Seven Lions, Cazzette, Boi1-DA, The Flashbulb (Benn Jordan), Sarom Soundz, Jay Frog, Tritonal, Maor Levi, Tom Swoon, Dot Rotten, Ummet Ozcan, Tristiam, Bare, Camo & Krooked.. plus 100′s of other professional artists and producers are all using FL Studio. You are showing your ignorance. BTW this was also made in FL Studio – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo1HRc_BseA

      Reply
    • Louis Valencia

      You’re really ignorant. Any professional producer uses third party vst’s. Fl studio should just be used for putting the song together, not the actual sound design.

      Reply
      • Dan

        If you’re going to comment on how professional producers use third parties VST’s, then that works for all DAW’s not just FL Studio. The OP stating that FL Studio sounds the worst of the bunch makes no sense. The quality depends on your VST’s, samples, recordings, etc. Not the DAW.

        Any VST that works in Ableton will work in FL Studio. It’s best to choose whichever one has the better workflow for YOU. In the end, the sound will be exactly the same. DAW’s don’t control the sound, in simple terms, they’re basically a UI to plugins and tools. They come pre-packaged with some, but as you said yourself, pros use third party ones anyways.

        Reply
  3. Producer

    Because we should definitely decide what DAW to purchase based on internet search activity rather than features and performance…

    I’ve never heard of a professional recording studio that uses Fl Studio.

    Reply
    • ben

      who cares what “professional recording studios” are using? most of the use cracks.

      Reply
    • Nina Ulloa

      if you’re looking at this list for ideas on what to get you’re probably not a professional recording studio…

      Reply
      • Producer

        Good point. But there’s still no reason readers – professional or not – should use “Most Buzzed-About” as an indication of what to buy. Why not skip the chart and instead provide an informed take on the merits of different software options? If you don’t have the background to provide that take, find a contributor who does.

        Reply
    • FL Studio is Here

      FL Studio is not designed as the center of an audio recording studio. But it certainly is used by professionals – Ever heard of Avicii, Afrojack, Armin van Buuren, Deadmau5, Brian Transeru, Porter Robinson, Feed Me, Madeon, Bass Hunter, Ephixa, Savant, Seven Lions, Cazzette, Boi1-DA, The Flashbulb (Benn Jordan), Sarom Soundz, Jay Frog, Tritonal, Maor Levi, Tom Swoon, Dot Rotten, Ummet Ozcan, Tristiam, Bare, Camo & Krooked.. plus 100′s of other professional artists and producers are all using FL Studio.

      Reply
      • Armando

        FL Studio is a complete daw. you can mix and master everything in FL. the same way you can record photos to a final to track you can do in FL Studio using the edison . a lot of people assume that it is child’s play. if you’re a professional then you know that it’s not. professionals study something before they make an opinion. just because you work in the music industry doesn’t make you professional. it makes you lucky. enjoy it. but don’t tell everybody what they’re using sucks because they’re not using ProTools logic or Ableton. reason will replace Pro Tools for recording, FL Studio is logic for PC. it will be on Mac soon. and it will become the new logic. you can use it as a full daw or you can use it as a VST and any other daw. you can rewire reason to FL Studio . I don’t know many software daww that do that. you couldn’t rewire reason into Ableton and use FL Studio as a VST. I don’t think anyone out there realizes the power in that. so everyone who says that FL Studio is child’s play. be a little more intelligent and do some research try the software.

        Reply
        • Stephen

          Just a word of note! You sure can rewire reason into Ableton Live 9 and also use FL Studio as a vst. I’ve done both myself.

          Reply
  4. Andy

    FL Studio one of the most using digital music composing software. Infact very rarely used by professionals, targeted to only beginners and enthusiastic musica lovers.

    Reply
  5. calvin james smoove

    I OWN licenses to cubase ableton live and fl studio. When you have a finished product you wouldn’t be able to tell how it was produced. The whole audio quality is a myth, since audio engineering is a science please respond with scientifically sound rebuttals

    Reply
  6. Bruce Burbank

    Nobody cares how you made the song. All they care about is the end result.

    The thing with DAWs these days is that they all do pretty much the same thing. The big difference between them is usually in the architecture- how sounds and instruments are organized, where stuff and settings are accessible. Those things have much more to do with ease of use than how your mixdown sounds.

    Anybody can pretty much achieve the same thing in Logic as in Fruity Loops as in ProTools as in Reaper as in Audition or any of the others. It’s just a matter of which one is laid out most logically for you.

    As for me, I’m logging most my time in Presonus Studio One (composition, stereo mixing) and Digital Performer (surround sound mixing) and Soundtrack Pro (mastering) these days. Most my friends use Renoise or Cubase or Abelton.

    Reply
  7. DG

    That’s how Nuendo became popular some years ago in the “home studio” circles. It was easily cracked and distributed by warez groups, who loaded it with viruses and scripts.

    A post production suite became massively popular among people who couldn’t even set up a high pass filter.

    Ask one of them if they know Reaper, a nice and very affordable DAW. They will have to search for the word, they are clueless.

    Reply
  8. wow how pro

    Good luck trying to properly set up a master channel in FL that conforms to audio specs.

    Reply
  9. RK

    I actually released for several labels and have been into music production for 15 years now. Nor does FL sound worse, nor do the others sound better. The same waveform sounds 100% the same when you compare the output. I actually use Cubase and FL inside Cubase. FL’s major advantage: Working with loops & fast creation of beats. FL’s mainly my sampler and groovebox inside Cubase, while I use Cubase to address all my external hardware

    Reply
  10. Jordan Owens

    I use Reaper.

    Feel free to bash me now for being that rebel that uses some trash that doesn’t even make the list.

    Yayyyy.

    Mediocre recordings brought to you by Sour Mash Recording Industries, LLC

    President, Smri

    @smrimusic
    @jordanowens45

    Reply
  11. mark

    Well, I agree that protools is the choice for professionals, but.most of you are thinking inside the box. Most professiobals use protools to edit BUT analogue to mix. The sound is outside the box people. Only analogue post production will give you the best, high grade sound. Let the real debate begin.and Ben, don’t bother commenting. Its obvious you don’t have a damn clue what yoyre talking about.

    Reply
    • mdti

      I know a guy who can master much better with his digital software than the studio with its loads of high end analog stuff. The former is also a dj who plays in various venues around the world, while the latter is always in his studio. Depends on talent and experience I suppose.

      Reply
  12. mdti

    (for info, I use Studio One and wouldn’t use anything else, as well as a few analog synths).

    Reply
  13. soniquarium muzika

    DAW’s are a matter of choice. Sasha once gave me advice while on tour. He told me to pick one DAW and learn it from inside and out. It so happen to be that we were on the Abelton Live tour with a bunch of US and he had just wrote Airdarwndagger using LIVE. It is the out board gear and the VST that you use to create unique sounds that put you on the map. The DAW is a personal choice.
    But the reality, that most do not want to hear, is SALES! That’s right, does not matter what DAW you use, if your tracks are not selling…then your just a basement producer who is having fun.

    Reply
  14. FL Studio is Here

    Ever heard of Avicii, Afrojack, rmin van Buuren, Deadmau5, Brian Transeru, Porter Robinson, Feed Me, Madeon, Bass Hunter, Ephixa, Savant, Seven Lions, Cazzette, Boi1-DA, The Flashbulb (Benn Jordan), Sarom Soundz, Jay Frog, Tritonal, Maor Levi, Tom Swoon, Dot Rotten, Ummet Ozcan, Tristiam, Bare, Camo & Krooked.. plus 100’s of other professional artists and producers are all using FL Studio. You guys are simply ignorant.

    Reply
    • Mosely Surreus

      DAWs ARE a matter of choice and I think you are doing a great job of convincing the would-be producer to choose something other than FL Studio. Stop being obnoxious and stop pasting that from wikipedia. Everybody on this thread who needs to believe that their choice of DAW is the best needs to STFU and get back to making music or their day job. Btw… I use FL Studio and I like it… a lot. One more thing regarding “ease of use”… ask yourself who’s producing the music, you or the software? FL Studio may be a good option for beginners (was for me), but I’ve never heard an argument against FL Studio based on it being too easy to use (though it’s pretty easy to make a WACK beat w/ the step sequencer). I’m pretty sure there are people on this thread who know way more about using their DAW then they know about music composition, signal processing, and so on. DETACH YOUR EGOS FROM YOUR DEVICES!!!

      Reply
      • Аркадий

        While it is bordering on spam, I think he is trying to make a point that there are a lot of professional users of FL Studio using it in professional settings. There seems to be a lot of bias and bigotry toward FL Studio in the posts above (without any basis in fact). Seems musicians are an insecure bunch and despite all claiming to be individual artists they want to all validate themselves by using the same tools that someone famous is using. FL Studio is as capable a DAW as any others on the list and at any time a good handful of songs in any top 50 were probably produced using it.

        Reply
  15. madetro

    To be honest, there are no differences between DAWs anymore because it all depends on the artist and how well they know the software, which is why FL is so popular among beginner’s, but that’s not to say that only beginner’s use FL Studio. If your music sound rubbish when using one DAW, using a different DAW won’t improve your music, it all depends on how well you know your software because once you do, you can do anything you want with it. A DAW doesn’t exist for a single genre either, and also, the main reason why FL doesn’t seem appealing to most people is because of it’s old name ‘Fruity Loops’ – forget that name, people! The reason why it was changed was more than just the silly ring to it – it was meant to show that even FL can stand up to your so called ‘superior DAWs’ (Ableton, etc)

    Reply
  16. Simon

    I’ve used a lot of programs starting from beginning of digital recording till date. All DAWs have pron and cons. FL is great (my son introduced it to me and I later became the one that convinces him to embrace the software) For a clear sound, determine your sample rate, don’t over use effects, minimize all volumes (just do good balancing), and maximize during mastering. I’ve used it on a song of an album where all other songs were done with pro tools, and nobody can tell the difference. You can as well run Cubase, etc., slaving FL as a vsti to let you do more flexible audio tracks recording and control, because there are sweet functions in FL that you will surely prefer as you keep trying various software.

    Reply
  17. EQ

    I am missing some important remarks here.
    Personally i do not like the FL interface, but having said that, it’s workflow seem to work out for a lot of EDM centric productions. It’s just fast!

    Together with some unique (randomization) functions, this makes it very appealing to especially the younger (=future) generation of producers.

    Reply
  18. Mr_jam

    well, I have tried Sonar, Cubase, and FL…and I like FL the most and I am using it until now. Then I have these friends which are also into music productions which uses Ableton and the other one is Pro Tools. What i notice is…the DAW that you really understand inside out how to use is the best music software for you. I even tried using Magix Music Maker and it is as well capable of producing descent music. It just really depends on the one using it. But speaking of FL Studio, it’s Piano Roll and Mixer is superb. You cannot also underrate the ease of use of this software…if you understand how to use it. Sorry for my english, I am not a native english speaker. 🙂 Cheers to all music producers out there!

    Reply
  19. Renegade

    Certainly this discussion is pointless, studio standard DAW like Pro-Tools handle complex and heavy recording sessions very well and has wider device compatibility also. Being an industry standard won’t mean that all other DAWs are hyped or useless. Once in the hands of a pro (in his/her mastered DAW) , no one will be able to tell the difference or the the software used to produce it. So, stop blabbering and stick with the one you feel more comfortable with. Haters are going to hate. (I don’t know why these studio and home music producing people put up such a naive argument, only newbies do it, I’ve never heard a pro say a thing like that)

    Reply
  20. tommy

    A real artist doesn’t cry about the shit he use..Fl Studio,Pro Tools,Cubase whatever DAW you use,it all comes back to your talent,the DAW is just a tool,guys..Talent is born between your ears,not between your legs

    Reply
  21. Jack

    Wow!!!
    What an awesome debating. I’m very impressed to be here.
    Trying to achieve my first hip hop Album using Fl Studio because of its simplicity, I was comparing the final Result of my Songs with those that use to run on the Radio and couldn’t see a big difference. Also, I could produce very good sounding Beats from it that I even could imagine.
    But I’ll take a time to learn Cubase myself to see nearly what people are talking about. I can imagine that combining it with Cubase might be the best thing to do.

    Reply
  22. lilharrell

    FL studio seen ok I’m just a newcomer to music but I like to make beat so is FL studio a good program

    Reply
  23. ste willy

    i love fl studio its great, who cares what DAWs people use ?? this is playground talk sort it out peoples and go make some banging hardstyle and shut it!!

    Reply
  24. Armando

    FL Studio is a complete daw. you can mix and master everything in FL. the same way you can record photos to a final to track you can do in FL Studio using the edison . a lot of people assume that it is child’s play. if you’re a professional then you know that it’s not. professionals study something before they make an opinion. just because you work in the music industry doesn’t make you professional. it makes you lucky. enjoy it. but don’t tell everybody what they’re using sucks because they’re not using ProTools logic or Ableton. reason will replace Pro Tools for recording, FL Studio is logic for PC. it will be on Mac soon. and it will become the new logic. you can use it as a full daw or you can use it as a VST and any other daw. you can rewire reason to FL Studio . I don’t know many software daww that do that. you couldn’t rewire reason into Ableton and use FL Studio as a VST. I don’t think anyone out there realizes the power in that. so everyone who says that FL Studio is child’s play. be a little more intelligent and do some research try the software.

    Reply
  25. fls user since the begining!

    I have been using Fruity loops since version 2! IMAGELINE SOFTWARE IS AWESOME! THEY THINK OF EVERYTHING!!!! NOTHING HAS ALLLL THE SAME OPTIONS! MAYBE YOUNGER KIDS USE IT BECAUSE ITS AWESOME AND NOT SOLD OLD LOOKING.

    Reply
  26. Dustin

    I use FL Studio to put together my songs. I usually make cinematic scores with it and Komplete 9 Ultimate VSTs. I only use a small number of plugins available in FL Studio.

    Reply
  27. Brunnwind

    Happy Cubase 7 user here. Simply love its clean layout, market-leading midi handling and the workflow that comes with it. I share users opinions of it being a full-blown allrounder that lets you compose, design, produce, mix and master absolutely everything from serious classical pieces to sophisticated electronic works. HOWEVER… DAWs are not all equal. Whoever claims that is a clueless idiot. Sorry.
    DAWs have strengths and weaknesses, as well as target customers.

    FL Studio’s sample manipulation resp. spectral functions are currently unmatched and can’t be recreated with any other software except custom Max 4 Life modules or Kyma, if you’re willing to spend 4000 $.

    Some music made by a professional sound designer who actually knows how to use FL:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJmA3OHxTOo
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQ390LISsOI

    I encourage all the self-proclaimed professionals to recreate this sound design with Pro Tools. Good luck.

    Reply
    • majastman

      I used fl studio, now i use reason. Also i used reaper. Lots of info i got from pro tools tutorials. So if you know what you’re doing you can use any DAW, but some of them a better for mixing, some of them for producing…

      Reply
  28. Just music

    The DAW one is using doesn’t matter.
    It is true that most of the professional studios are using protools, but remember that every professional sound engineer has learned on Protools, or Cubase etc… Not Fl Studio, which is a young software, that has progressively rises to the concurrence’s level.
    I believe you can do professional sound on Fl Studio, as on every DAW actually, as soon as you use external vst’s and plug ins.

    Reply
  29. tommy

    Use what ever works for you. The true artist doesn’t complain,he/she just makes music 🙂

    Reply
  30. Thompson

    A true professional will know how mix and master in a program as for “beginner” as FL.sound quality is a myth and no DAW can mix,record produce by itself it needs your experience and talent.SOUND ENGINEERING is 35% Science and 65% creativity.no matter how “professional” pro tool is it can not mix by itself.

    Reply
  31. payback

    I say when music sounds the best is when you can get a clean sound before adding plug in
    so go with reason or logic
    reason contain more sythn sounds
    logic more warm classical analog feel
    frutty loops a little of both it just takes more tweaking to get what your looking for

    Far as making beats.

    For vocals if your not using protools 9 or better
    shoot your self lol
    artist and producer Payback

    Reply
  32. Vashima

    FL studio has one of the best workflows out there. I think a lot of people who make super tasty tunes use more than one daw from start to finish. For example, I like to use fl to get the ball rolling with ideas, sample editing and overall song structure crafting. I’ll bounce wav and midi data into pro tools and set things up in there for phase 2. I wouldn’t/don’t use FL for recording analog instruments (not that it can’t), ProTools or Cubase is better suited for that sort of thing. A lot of people have already said this, but any daw is good if you work good in it. trying to write riffs and licks in some software is not intuitive at all and kills the creative buzz. FL does not do this, it is fast and sexy. I feel that it is more accessible and this is why some people think only “noobs” use it. I will use it forever alongside reason and protools. If you are looking to make music by yourself and don’t have any external equipment, FL is a great choice.

    in my experience, this is how the previously mentioned software has been used to its potential. (they can all essentially do everything, this seems how they have been used the best) 😀

    Ableton- Live Electronic Music
    Reason- Composition
    FL Studio- Composition
    Cubase- Mixing/Mastering controlling your studio’s external hardware (home base for composing software and tracking integration)
    Protools-Mixing/Mastering controlling your studio’s external hardware (home base for composing software and tracking integration)

    Reply
  33. Jared

    Because money directly correlates to talent. Just buy the most expensive one and you’ll make hits, I promise.

    Reply
  34. elson

    yall must be constipated or something fighting over things that don’t even matter to the creator of these daw’s,just go make a beat

    Reply
  35. Shotgun Genetics

    I am a professional musician using FL Studio to produce all kinds of music for TV, film and commercials and frankly I want no other program. It does not matter to your audience what you put your patterns into. It only matters how well you are able to mix them and how much experience you have in studio mixes in general. Your talent is not exposed with the DAW you use. It is exposed in how creative you are so it does not matter. All arguments about one DAW being better than another are nonsense because only your experience and creativity will matter. If you do not know what playing something in the key of A is, you will not produce much on any DAW. A lack of any music theory training is the main problem I do see and leaning on audio clips for a lack of creativity is one such activity. I would guess however I can control my audio clips and what they do with five years experience on this DAW than you can on any other in the world. Test me. thanks.

    Reply
  36. Elliott

    I don’t think that the DAW matters at all and I see a lot of people discussing which is better, etc. It’s all in the user. Junkie Kid couldn’t go into Ableton and make a hit Hard House track, just the same as 3LAU couldn’t go into FL Studio and make a hit record.

    If people want to get into this they just need to get a DAW and dive in. Ableton and FL are great because they have a ton of tutorials and resources online, which can be harder to find for Reason or Cubase.

    —-
    Ableton Vs. FL Studio

    Reply
  37. Gez

    I am currently hesitating in buying FL studio which I was going to do after enjoying the demo, however, I have two friends with differing opionions on DAWS and one is telling me Ableton and the other is telling me Reason.
    Having invested many hours into learning how FL studio works (and happy with how I use it) I am a bit annoyed after reading this debate/blog that they put me off FL. Is there anyone who can tell me what the best DAW is for making drum and bass/electronic music in which I can make some crazyily heavy sounding bass sounds which would rock a building and which has really good orchestral sound effects? Also can i record decent vocals on FL studio? Also is there any other tips anyone can add in helping which one to purchase. #novice/beginner who wishes to create good drum and bass crossover music

    Reply
    • Mike

      If you’re familiar with and comfortable with FL Studio I would stick with that. Don’t let people tell you what DAW is right or wrong. Everyone is going to argue which DAW is best based off of which one they have. How good your music sounds isn’t dependent on which DAW you use, it is dependent on you the producer. Everything you’ve mentioned that you want to do is completely doable in FL Studio, I would recommend investing some money in VST synth software. Sylenth1, Nexus, and Zebra are a couple good synths just to name a few. I’ve heard some good things about Kicklab XXL for drum design, however, I’ve heard good things, never actually used it. You’re not going to go from novice to pro overnight, big name producers that make that perfect sound have 10,000s+ hours of producing under their belt. Their are a lot of good YouTube tutorials out there that cover everything from synth programming, to track layout, to mastering. Checkup on some of those, and you’ll get better with practice.

      Reply
  38. HeadlessHorseman

    Food for thought! Has anyone ever listened to the radio or heard a new club smashing trance anthem on ASOT and said “Oh hey, that sounds like Cubase, I know they used Cubase for that production, or shit, I know they used Ableton for this!” No… Probably not. If DAW x, is better than DAW y, for making say, trance music, then don’t you think all or most of the trance producers would be using DAW x? That’s why Armin Van Buuren uses Logic, Orjan Nilsen uses FL Studio and Cubase, and Above and Beyond is still bangin’ out on anolog instruments. One can’t ask which DAW is best, it’s a moot question that has no answer and is based solely on personal opinion and preference. I think a lot of the misconception lies within aspiring producers who want to know what DAW Armin uses because they think that this DAW is going to give them his particular sound. When in reality, no DAW is going to give you that result, it is up to the producer to create that result. What DAW you use should be based on ease of use, familiarity, workflow, organization of layout, customized options, what works best with your budget, etc… The argument over the DAW wars of which sounds better is just ridiculous.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Verify Your Humanity *
Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.