Twitter Sued For Blatant DMCA Takedown Violations

2767127278_ee60f266a7_z

Twitter is being accused of serious copyright infringement, due to ignoring several DMCA takedown requests.

Like so many user-generated sites, Twitter is often used to host or link to copyright infringing material.  As part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA, Twitter is obligated to promptly take down infringing material if it receives a takedown request from right holders.

And what happens if those requests aren’t acted upon?  Over the past several months, Twitter has reportedly processed thousands of requests and adhered to the majority of them.  But a new lawsuit filed in a California federal court has shed light on the company’s possible inconsistencies in their takedown efforts.

Screen Shot 2016-01-15 at 00.31.02

The suit was filed by photographer Jennifer Rondinelli Reilly, who is demanding a jury trial.  Reilly lodged the action after discovering the unauthorized use of her work.  As part of standard procedure, Reilly sent Twitter several DMCA takedown requests.

Twitter allegedly failed to act upon a substantial number of them.  “On November 18, 2015, Reilly sent 28 notices to Twitter regarding the Infringing Uses,” the complaint reads.  “Twitter has not removed or disabled access to 50 of the 56 Infringing Uses.”

 

Screen Shot 2016-01-15 at 00.33.22

 

The ‘no-no’ could cost Twitter dearly.  Although the DMCA prevents service providers from being liable for the acts of their users, if DMCA notices are consistently ignored, the breach is serious and actionable.

4 Responses

  1. User PIRATED Content, get it right.

    It’s User PIRATED Content, encouraged by a loop-hole in the DMCA that allows for mass scale, enterprise level infringement as a business model. Between this and COX maybe the Sheriff is finally coming to town…

    Reply
  2. Versus

    Twitter must pay, pay, pay for this. No excuse for it. And users who link to infringing materials should have their accounts suspended.

    Reply
  3. David

    One more example of why the DMCA notice and takedown procedure is a sham weighted against rightsholders. Companies like Twitter hide behind it to justify blatant disregard for copyright. Cox just found out how inaction/avoidance on takedowns can be to the tune of 25 million.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Verify Your Humanity * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.