My Band Has 1,000,000 Spotify Streams. Want to See Our Royalties?

Spotify Royalty Statement

This is the largest spreadsheet of Spotify royalty data we’ve received to date.

That group that shared these statements was unsigned until just a few months ago, and is fast-rising within a specific EDM niche.  While still label-less, they somehow managed to get onto a few Spotify featured playlists.  That’s becoming increasingly difficult for smaller artists, though lightning can strike if the right, influential playlist curator stumbles upon your (awesome) music.

We’ve seen this happen before, particularly to singer/songwriter Perrin Lamb, who scored more than $40,000 after getting slotted onto some heavily-streamed coffeehouse playlists (which powered more than 10 million streams).  We asked this group how they got slotted onto their plum playlists, and they told us they’re not sure exactly how it happened.  They weren’t working a strategy, they didn’t have a label at the time, and they definitely didn’t have money to blow on ‘playlist payola’ (and if you think you don’t need that, read this).

That said, it looks like this group has been getting a good amount of critical acclaim and buzz within their electronica niche, especially from their home turf of Australia.  So, it’s not entirely an accident that Spotify picked up on that momentum.

Looks like things are going well for these guys.  The group just signed an independent record deal and keep getting attention (and you’ve probably heard of this label).

And with that, here are this group’s Spotify stats.  We’re missing that last few months, based reporting lag (and maybe their recent signing), but we’ve straight line estimated those based on the previous data (which goes back to October of 2013).

Total number of streams: 1,023,501

Total revenue: $4,955.90

Specific time period accounted: 10/15/2013 – 2/15/2013

(March, April, May periods not yet reported; estimated)

Average per-stream payout: $0.004891

And, for those who want to take the plunge, here’s the entire royalty breakdown.  If enough people want to play with the data itself, we’ll put a shared spreadsheet up on Gdrive or something (just let us know in comments).

And please share your royalties to news@digitalmusicnews.com!  It will greatly help other artists and the industry to get a better sense of what streaming platforms are paying.

Written while listening to ‘2 Phones’ by Kevin Gates.

 

 

 

34 Responses

  1. anon

    I wonder how much the amount would be now compared to 2.5 years ago? The 1M streams would be diluted by increased usage onf the platform, but Spotify also collects a lot more in sub fees and advertising dollars because of this.

    Reply
      • lol

        yeah just go back to playing CDs with clunky players from the 90s out of touch old man.

        Reply
  2. Streamer4LyfNigga

    “According to APRA AMCOS, the average fee for a metro commercial radio station to play a song is $6. Regional stations still have to pay, but the fee is lower.” That song could have been listened to by up to 50,000 people with a conservative estimate so $5,000 per million streams seems like a fair amount.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      Yes, radio stations are pirate companies that need to be shut down asap.

      50 years ago, they meant everything to the music industry. Today, they’re absolutely — literally — worthless!

      Reply
      • lol

        today’s music industry still thinks anyone under 30 is going to go to a retail shop and buy a 20$ album to listen on a clunky cd player. says more about the old timers running it than anything.

        Reply
  3. Anonymous

    “Total number of streams: 1,023,501. Total revenue: $4,955.90”

    Wooow, that’s as bad as YouTube!

    Reply
      • Anonymous

        No, $5/1,000 YouTube views are not uncommon if you use an MCN.

        So there goes Spotify’s only selling point.

        Reply
      • Anonymous

        If there was a federally mandated streaming rate, say 1 cent per stream, think about how much money Google would be forced to pay to artists.

        Think about it.

        Reply
        • lol

          you cant compete so you try to make things like the good ol days eh?

          you guys are dying off..

          Reply
    • rp

      How is that bad when it could have been zero dollars, and note that not all their streams come from AU… Seems good to me. I’m sure there are a ton of artists out there, signed and unsigned that wouldn’t mind trading places.

      Reply
    • rty

      Even in the days of the record companies exploiting artists with vinyl singles sales there would have been a major difference in revenues for the artist, I imagine. If you sold 1,000,000 hard copy units you would likely be given a gold record or something like it rather than a deal with an independent label which has no money or influence.

      Reply
  4. Me2

    Songwriter’s shares on these subscription platforms have always been abysmal.

    Can’t really compare network radio plays vs streams.. why do people always do that? It’s magnitudes difference.

    Needless to say 1milllion plays in digital land should be worth more than a coffee.

    Dilution by volume is the ostensible factor, but it equates to major revenue grab.

    Your punk band’s fans just subsidized Drake’s latest.

    Mathematical fact.

    Who gives a shit about your half a million plays.

    Reply
    • Me2

      Can I edit that? I didn’t really mean “digital land”, I meant “subscription land”.

      Reply
  5. Forrest Gump

    $5,000 per 1M streams seems almost reasonable. For you to earn $5,000 on traditional radio your music would have been heard by more than 1M people.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      “For you to earn $5,000 on traditional radio your music would have been heard by more than 1M people.”

      Um yes, that’s why we don’t need radio. It was great 50 years ago, but today it’s absolutely worthless.

      Reply
      • Captain Obvious

        If it’s so worthless, why are there still stations doing it? Pandora is non-interactive, basically radio. I know, i know, involving IP (Internet Protocol) rather than just using EM waves is somehow special.

        Reply
        • Anonymous

          “If it’s so worthless, why are there still stations doing it?”

          Oh, but it isn’t worthless for the radio stations!

          On the contrary — monetizing other people’s property for free is an awesome business model.

          If you can get away with it. And preventing that is the next big thing after fixing the DMCA.

          Reply
          • Anonymous

            Radio stations don’t monetize for free. They have to pay the song writer for every song they play.

            Don’t comment on things you’re ignorant about.

          • Captain Obvious

            @Anonymous
            Songwriters get a royalty from radio play, but it’s the performers that aren’t paid ANYTHING in the US for radio play. An embarrassment shared by only few countries, North Korea being one of them.

  6. Rick Shaw

    Boo fricking hoo! Go play a bunch of pay to play shows for thousands of people and have to pay for the exposure. Sheesh.

    Reply
  7. Eddie

    1M streams may have been an impressive number half a decade ago, but lets be realistic – in mid 2016, 1M streams isn’t that great.

    Reply
  8. Eric

    $5,000 doesn’t seem that bad for 1M streams. According to the data, that was for one month. So let’s say the band streams at least 1M streams for the next few months, that’s $5k every month. No, it’s not a lot, but then again you have to diversify. If I was a small band and got paid $5k for a month AND got a possible record deal (even if it’s indie), that would be a win for me. Streaming services do market your music, it’s just become a crowded market that everyone wants in on.

    Reply
  9. Reggie

    Specific time period accounted: 10/15/2013 – 2/15/2013

    Im getting the ment 2/15/2016?

    Reply
  10. bloze duchamp

    how much is one million streams worth from Pirate Bay ?

    Reply
  11. BPH

    Label-less and a 1M streams. Sounds like Spotify is launching their career. I am still amazed that artists will never be satisfied because they live in the past. Until everyone realizes that the CD boom of the 90s is over and gone for, we are going to get these articles.

    At least you are getting paid for your music now…

    Reply
  12. Whoo Boy!!!!

    “Total number of streams: 1,023,501
    Total revenue: $4,955.90”

    What an incredibly incomplete and entirely misleading “revelation.”

    1) How much did they get for the publishing/performance from their PRO? You don’t include that, here.

    2) How much did they get for their radio plays to over a million listeners? You don’t allow any type of comparison, here.

    Forrest Gump
    $5,000 per 1M streams seems almost reasonable. For you to earn $5,000 on traditional radio your music would have been heard by more than 1M people.

    Exactly.

    BPH
    Label-less and a 1M streams. Sounds like Spotify is launching their career. I am still amazed that artists will never be satisfied because they live in the past. Until everyone realizes that the CD boom of the 90s is over and gone for, we are going to get these articles.

    At least you are getting paid for your music now…

    Exactly.

    Reply
  13. dkmstr

    The some streams will eventually generate downloads with with a terrific jaw dropping pay per download rate. Oh boy bere I do not see any big difference between owning a single cd and a download except from the fantastic 2016 royalty

    Reply
  14. professional musician

    SOOOOO much misinformation and misinterpretation around this topic. I make a living from Spotify. I don’t tour, I don’t have a major label propping me up, faking my numbers, or any of the other crap the industry requires. Spotify pays well over a penny per paid stream in the US. That’s significantly more than most other streaming sources. It blows away the per listener rate for radio play, and YouTube isn’t even close… even if you sign away your rights and first born to a MCN.

    Yes, the overall rate is less because of all the free users, but whether people want to admit it or not, these are users who are worth ZERO otherwise. Anyone who still believes freemium isn’t the best path forward has zero business sense or has been under a rock for the past decade when it comes to internet marketing. The numbers speak for themselves.

    I have tens of thousands of fans on Spotify. NONE of them had heard of me previously, and NONE of them have seen me in concert, yet they are paying my mortgage while hoards of whiny internet babies bitch about the loss of the “good old days” where gatekeepers owned everything and independents had no access.

    Pure stupidity.

    Reply
  15. Researcher

    Please share raw data in csv or any spreadsheet format. I want to do per-country calculations. I will share results here.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Verify Your Humanity *