A List of Every Item Discovered by Police In Michael Jackson’s Residence (NSFW)

Michael Jackson Evidence

Please note: there are no images of the items listed in this report.  If you want to see the images, go to the leaked report as published by Radar Online, here (NSFW, possibly disturbing depending on your sensitivity).

[Pages not in order; listed how they appear]

Page 4:

Evidence Item #507. Piece of notebook paper, with drawn image of boy inside a circle.

Impressions of writing from words written on other sheets on top of this one in the pad; indecipherable words.

Evidence Item #508. Book with images of ‘nude teenagers and/or young adults’

Located in upstairs library area of video/game room.  The book was titled, The Fourth Sex: Adolescent Extreme, with no listed author.

The investigator noted that this book focuses on ‘adolescents and counter culture,’ contained lots of images of semi-clothed or naked ‘teenagers and/or young adults’ and actually isn’t illegal under US law.  But, it represents a tool that could be used to ‘lower the inhibitions of intended victims’ and ‘facilitate the molestation of said individuals’.

Evidence Item #509. Book with pictures of nude children.

The hard cover book is titled Cronos, by author Pere Formigeura, contains images of nude children of both sexes, as well as adults.  Same location as item #508.

Evidence Item #510. Disneyland plastic bag containing underclothes and bloodied bed linens.  The Garden City bag also contained:

  • a bright orange pair of shorts, size 4, ‘possibly for a young girl’.
  • a new pair of Spiderman socks.
  • child-sized, off-white t-shirt.
  • pairs of gray, white, and blue child socks.
  • a significant amount of clothing for an adult male.

Evidence Item #517. Compact disc.

Contents duplicated at police crime lab, before returned to evidence bag.

Evidence Item #302.  Pornographic magazine.

The Best of Club, Issue no. 201.   Also suspected by the inspecting officer to be ‘grooming’ materials.

Page 3.

Evidence Item #505.  Books with pictures of nude children.

Three books, containing ‘photographs of nude and partially clothed children’.  The investigator noted that the books contained images of partially clothed or naked children, as well as images of nude adults with children’s faces morphed on top.  This technique may be used to sexualize and lower the inhibitions of a victim, according to the report.

Page 7.

Evidence Item #303.  Three books containing nude photographs, including those of teenagers and pre-teenagers.

Naked and semi-clothed images of women ‘in sexually explicit poses,’ as well as naked men as filmed by a gay photographer.  One book contained semi-clothed or fully-nude teenagers or pre-teenagers, according to the report.

Evidence Item #304.  Two pornographic magazines, two ‘nude art books’

Magazines were Barely Legal and Girls of Penthouse, with one book titled, The Gynoids Genetically Manipulated.  That book contained, according to the report, ‘appeared to have a fetish (bondage, Sadomasichism, piercings, etc.) related theme’.

Page 8.

Evidence Item #305.  Photograph of McCauley Caulkin.

Taken on set from a Home Alone movie, comically signed by the actor.

Page 9.

Evidence #306. Pornographic magazine inside a metal briefcase.

Couples, Volume 7, Issue 2.

Evidence #307. Book with pictures of nude men.

The models are posing only, and not in sexually explicit or suggestive poses.

Evidence #309. Black leather laptop bag containing pornographic magazines and DVDs, several sheets of paper.

Of the pieces of paper, one simply contained the words, ‘Paris and me’.  Another was a Guess ad ripped from a magazine.  The DVD was separated into evidence number #309-A.  Other items in the bag included a pen, business card from Goldman Sachs, ripped-up fax pertaining to a concert details, batteries, jewelry, children’s book, some handwritten notes, and a syringe.   It also contained a letter from a counselor at the Gary Community School Corporation, arranging plans to bring children to visit California in the first half of 2004.

Also included were notes between Jackson and Gavin Arvizo, who later accused the pop star of molestation.

The DVDs were the following titles: Michael Ryan’s Believe It or Not, which featured hardcore pornography, and Sloppy Dogs Presents: Fuck Me, I’m a Bad Girl.

There were also two issues of Gallery, a pornographic magazine.

Evidence Item #313. Book containing nude photographs.

No images sexually explicit in nature.

Other items described in court filings (contained within the same document stack):

Book: ‘Boys Will be Boys,’ contains full frontal nudity of boys under the age of 14; personally inscribed by Michael Jackson.

Book: ‘In Search of Young Beauty,’ containing pictures of children, boys and girls, some nude.

Book: ‘The Boy, a Photographic Essay,’ containing images of boys, some nude.

Photograph: Noted in the document as ‘believed to be Jonathan Spence; fully nude.’

Photograph: young boy holding an umbrella, with bikini bottoms partially pulled down.

Evidence Item #363:

12 pornographic magazines;

12 nudist magazines, vintage 1930s.

Evidence Item #364: ‘The Chop Suey Club’

Photo book, young adult male models, some nude.

Evidence Item #365: Pornographic books, including images of naked children.

‘The Christy Report’, nude images from the 1940s, some described as sadomasochistic.

‘Robert Maxwell Photographs,’ various images, including those of children.

Evidence Item #366: Several books, containing images of nude men and children.

Nude images of a nude male couple, another contained nude images of men from the 1800s.  Photos of teenage males nude, images of adults with childrens’ faces morphed on top, some nude photos of children.

Another book, Man: A Sexual Study of Man, described as a ‘graphic primer for homosexuals,’ including pictures of masturbation, oral and anal sex, homosexual erotica.

This evidence group also includes ‘two dozen nudist magazines’.

Evidence Item #301: Five pornographic DVDs.

Includes ‘Pimps Up – Ho’s Down,’ plus 4 ‘Barely Legal’ DVDs.

Items found across several laptop computers:

(also from subsequent court papers now released and added to the documentation)

Screen Shot 2016-06-21 at 1.52.30 PM







64 Responses

  1. Angie

    Why wasn’t this used to charge him? Why bring this up now? It’s too late, he’s dead, all it does, it will hurt his children.

    • Ricky Bobby

      And the victims, you don’t care about them? If it happened…

    • Bill

      No, Angie, it will settle once and for all that we all facilitated serial child molestation on a massive scale by buying tickets, albums, and enjoying (dry heave!) his music which guaranteed airplay and translated in to ASCAP/BMI fees which made him rich, which allowed him to pay off all the people who must have known. Most or all of those people are still alive, and still making money off his legacy in one way or another—that is, unless we dump all that we own of the Jacksons, and complain when we hear it on the radio or on the muzak in the department store, etc. As a musician who played his songs for many years at weddings, I am especially disgusted that I was used as a conduit to perpetuate his wealth and the means by which he committed these atrocities. We were all deceived, but we all clung to a very dubious hope that what looks like a child molester, sounds like a child molester (“Pretty Young Thing”???) wasn’t in fact: a child molester.

      • King

        Innocent on all charges people!! INNOCENT ON ALL CHARGES PEOPLE BY A COURT OF LAW!!!!



        • JL

          100 percent wrong. A “not guilty” verdict does not mean he was or is innocent. It means the case was not proved beyond a reasonable doubt, or it could be that the jury overlooked the evidence due to who the defendant was.

          • Eddie

            Or it could mean that he was innocent–why don’t you try that on you silly ideology-

        • SIN

          This is why people don’t like black people, you know that right?

          • Eddie

            You know why people don’t like racist like you–Because you’re to stupid to realize how stupid you are–

          • Eddie

            You know why people don’t like a racist like you–is because you are to asinine to realize just how stupid you sound–

        • timmy

          They can’t hurt him “know” more huh? If you were a little bit smarter you’d know how to write a grammatically correct sentence. He got away with it because he was rich as fuck and loved by millions. That does not make him innocent. That makes him above the law. I doubt you knew him personally so how the fuck do you have a leg to stand on in your mindless “innocent” stance? If your still denying that he did anything wrong with all of the evidence that has been released, you obviously are retarded as fuck and need to be put down.

          • Yolamser

            You slammed the grammar then put your instead of you’re. You cunt. Shame.

          • Eddie

            And you were there and saw what went on–Amazing how stupid some people are–

  2. Bob

    If he was in possession of child porn, why wasn’t he charged? That is a crime. Smells fishy to me.

    • Paul Resnikoff
      Paul Resnikoff

      I really don’t know the answer to that, especially after reading this entire report. But I started to think there are some lines that Jackson somehow didn’t cross: the report kept saying that Jackson wasn’t technically guilty of child pornography, which I really didn’t understand. Isn’t possession of images of naked children enough to qualify? Guess I need a lawyer to chime in here.

      • Jeffrey

        As a Jackson fan still on the fence of veracity concerning Jackson’s pedophilia, a careful reader will notice that not one of these items is actually child porn, as not one of them contains images of children in suggestive or sexual acts… While some of the images may be very bizarre, the context of them being in mostly art photo books – such as Cronos by Pere Formiguera – seems to be left out in these media reports… The only actual porn they caught on Jackson’s hands was straight-male porn.

        • KevinC

          THIS. Like evidence #302 where they try very hard to sell it as “inspection office suspected it as grooming material”. BS. Who gives a flying f what he thinks, go try that in a court.

        • david

          i am a die hard fan sins i was 5 years old. but honestly if the name wasn’t michael jackson, would we go in the defense for a random person having all of this things in his house?

          • Jennifer

            I honestly have to say yes. For a few years I taught preschoolers in a Catholic Church after the scandal hit. We had to go to training to be able to detect possible pedophiles and the training included videos of former offenders describing how they selected victims and got them to go along with abuse. It was pretty creepy, and also insidious. All of this evidence is pretty damning, even if it was not enough for formal charges to stick in a court of law.

      • BD

        Artistically rendered pictures that depict nudes (mostly semi nude, actually) adults of both sexes as well as children are not pornographic. It says this repeatedly in the document. There was no child pornography found, only legal adult porn. Did you happen to notice that several pieces of “evidence” were actually professional shots of Michael’s nephews — who have their own pop group — for their CD cover? The investigator admits such and even admits to having viewed these photos in a magazine. Yet still says because they depict young males, bare-chested, in “suggestive poses” that they could be used to “groom” children for abuse. Ridiculous. And very sick thinking, by the way, and not on Michael’s part. All the male nudes (mostly in art books) are said to verify Michael’s interest in homosexual activity (which offensively enough, the investigator seems to equate with pedophilia), while the heterosexual porn is explained away as “grooming” aids. Unbelievable.

      • rikki


        technically its not a crime to have it, but it is a crime to do something with it. like show it to a minor send it to another adult….that’s what puts people in jail they have a child porn ring and even if its encrypted its still a criminal act.

    • Eddie

      This is bull shit–if they had this evidence, why didn’t they use it–And if they just founded it, why didn’t they found it when they searched hi homes when he was alive–

  3. Jack

    He attaches this “grooming”-nonsense to EVERY piece of evidence.

  4. Cognitive Dissonance Much?

    he had multiple books in which young people are depicted naked… which psychologists have stated is what pedophiles often do, collect non-sexual imagery of unclothed kids. also, the authors on a couple of those books are pseudonyms for NAMBLA creeps. also, we know he had multiple sleepovers with kids in his bedroom, and those books/mags were found on shelves, in a bag next to the bed, in a bathroom, where they could easily be shown or looked at by visiting kids (it just happens to be on the shelf in the bathroom!). absolutely about lowering inhibitions (“everyone parties in just their underwear”) and/or to stimulate the straight kids. also note: the rich/famous kids like Mculkin or Feldman were never touched, just the poor kids — because they had no power base. predator all the way.

    • BD

      He had loads of art books of every description — and adult porn. Your spinning it in your own twisted way (“those books/mags were found on shelves” gasp!) doesn’t change those facts.

      • 4

        He didn’t just have one, he had many that showed young kids naked. He collected them. Read the police report. I find it very disturbing that fact after fact can be laid out — witness testimoney, hush money paid out, multiple accounts, and people still say he is innocent. Just like Cosby, or Sandusky.

        You can show a fan an MF fan a video of Jackson dangling his kid out the window, and they won’t say “That’s terrible”, they’ll just say “Oh he was excited to show his child to fans.” No. He dangled his kid out of a hotel window.

        • BD

          I did read the police report. I also read the recent clarification from the DA’s office refuting RadarOnline and stating no child pornography was found. People.com covered this. But there were no headlines equivalent to the inaccurate ones blaring about “child pornography.” No retractions. No apologies. The New Zealand Herald, the LA Times, and the San Jose Mercury News should be sued for libel, but I doubt the Jackson family has the energy or cares to devote the resources to that. Generating those inaccurate headlines (with complete impunity) appears to be the entire point of this recent exercise. As with your statements that do not detail specifics of how and why the Chandler settlement was paid or the many inconsistencies of the accusers brought out in the 2005 trial, the entire point seems to be to cast vague damning statements with no specifics. What’s surprising is how long this has gone on. Are there no investigative reporters out there anymore? Legitimate journalists just shake their heads and turn away, while the tabloids and more complicit media like the LA Times have a field day. I have no dog in the fight and the courts sometimes get it wrong, but the evidence does not support a supposition of guilt. I keep thinking it might. But it never does. I am only saying that the accusers have failed to prove their case. Despite that, the desire to continue to wreck Michael Jackson’s legacy in the court of public opinion is ongoing, and it’s genuinely unclear who is behind it. For what it’s worth, I think OJ was indeed guilty and the evidence is looking bad for Cosby.

        • Jennifer

          Before all of this I was trying not to be biased and give Jackson a fair hearing. However, I believe that you are correct. I guess it is easy to be in denial that amazing talent can come out of. . . worse issues. This is bad.

  5. Mary

    He is totally innocent and these evidence are so funny that find in everyone house. Please leave him alone.

    • JL

      And because he is totally innocent he paid out millions to keep victims silent? And after being charged the first time he continued to have young boys sleep in his bed? Sorry, but I’d bet my life’s savings that he is guilty many times over.

      PS- no you do not find books with photos of naked children and pornographic magazines in everyone’s house.

      • MakingSomethingInnocentEvil

        They were art and photography books gifted to him by his many famous friends

  6. AlexKx

    He’s a witch! He’s a witch! I can just tell! Everyone else told me so! All you have to do is look at him! He’s obviously a monster! An animal! GET HIM!!! Oh, no. Wait. He’s dead already. Oh, well.

    Of course you all realize that no human being has been as hunted, demonized, and sabotaged as much as Michael Jackson, right? That’s because when one looks at the facts they find out that in terms of any legal issues these are all lies.

    You all realize that the first payout settlement that was 25 million U.S. dollar done in 1994 was not paid for by Michael Jackson. His insurance company paid that. Now Michael made payment but it is not known how much. This is according to the settlement leaked by one of Rupert Murdoch’s companies called “The Smoking Gun” years ago. Which I thought was illegal but since when is the mainstream media held responsible for anything it has ever done or does do?! Insurance companies do not make payments if they think that a crime was committed. Five million to Larry Feldman the lawyer (who would show up a decade latter to make some good old money), five million to the parents (of which the Mother said this was all lies), and fifteen million to Jordy Chandler. It is also stated in this settlement from 1994 that while there was an accusation of sex abuse made that this settlement was not about that and that it was only for neglect towards the boy Jordy Chandler and the father Evan Chandler. Was Michael also having sex and abusing his father?! This craziness and absurdity goes on and on.

    But since Gobbles oops! I mean the mainstream media are so on top of things letting people know what’s going on and what’s most serious may I ask the following:

    How’s the genocide going on? How’s the catching of real child molesters going on? How’s the drug epidemic going on? How’s the debt crises? How’s supporting an over reaching government going on? How’s surrendering your peace, freedom, and prosperity to a cult of personality going on? How’s losing your wars on purpose for sixty years now when you did not have to working out for you? You think the mainstream media aren’t Gobbles? I wouldn’t be so sure.

    • ©

      Ummm…. Do you realize you’re reading a music news site and not a global politics site? I guess what the website is called is normally a terrible indicator of the subject matters you can expect to see. Especially when the sites name is so literal to the content…. wait…. No, you’re just an idiot fill with unearned moral superiority and unintelligible indignation.

  7. AlexKx

    The problem that the establishment had with Michael Jackson wasn’t that he was or wasn’t a child molester. There are plenty of those and obviously the mainstream media have no interest in dealing with them. They would rather do everything in their power to get Michael Jackson. The law where Michael Jackson lived was even changed SPECIFICALLY to catch him and even that did not work. I guess he was not only a child molester but a magical one, right? If you believe one you might as well believe the other. We are talking about the worlds most powerful and capable detective force on the planet. The L.A. Police Detective Force.

    Any who the reasons the establishment had a problem with Michael Jackson (and still do) is not because he (or in this case the Estate) still own fifty percent of Neverland (mainly because they can’t get anyone to buy it; at least at the price they want lol), that he still owns fifty percent of Sony/ATV (The Beatles, Elvis, thousands of other recording artists from the past to the present), or that “Thriller” sold one hundred million copies worldwide according to both The World Music Awards and Guiness Book Of World Records but because Michael Jackson was “pide pipper” for white youth. A black man is not supposed to be having maniacal, hysterical, paying white children following him on the level that Michael Jackson did. That was and obviously is still a threat to certain people and they will go to and move the ends of the Earth to do whatever necessary to destroy him.

  8. AlexKx

    Oh, and by the way Michael’s Estate still have not sold their half of Sony/ATV because the European Union stopped it because it was considered “too large” or what have you. Michael’s Estate were supposed to receive seven hundred fifty million U.S. dollars for it making it the largest payment ever for one single person to receive in the music industry.

    • 4

      okay janet, or tito, enough. we get it, you want your share of the estate. i

  9. heclistust

    two days ago grey McLaren. P1 I bought afterearning 18,515 Dollars..it was my previous month’s payout..just a littleover.17k Dollars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly payouts..it’s realy thesimplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making overhourly.

    GO to The web……….CareersPlus90.Tk

  10. Be Real

    With all of this being said , where are the victims ? The children that were said to have been molested denied it every happened , but the parents are the ones who brought forth the charges , but MJ was never found guilty. If MJ was a sick demented person , victims would be coming out the woodwork like crazy to sue his $ Billion dollar estate. Propaganda , lies & rumors. If he was guilty I would be the first to say put him under the jail floor , and let him rot to death , but the evidence proves he was not guilty of these former accusations. Funny you never hear of accusations from any other superstar’s that the media and other organizations hold to a higher esteem , you know what I mean…………………..!

    • JL

      You should do some research. A number of victims have come forward as have their parents. A number were also paid off for their silence. Yes I’m sure OJ and Cosby are also completely innocent…

    • 4

      were the 5 accusers who did come forward believed, or have they been vilified? you understand that that’s what companies do when there are billions at stake? What are you talking about other superstars — look how long it took to get Cosby (or that Sandusky character) 30 years of rumors before their actions became well known.

  11. Jack

    Seems kind of fake to me, I will wait and if this is ends up being true then it’s a shame he isn’t alive to pay for his crimes. But if this is fake, I think is enough of trying to hurt someone’s image.

    I still believe in Michael.

    • Ryan

      I also believe in Michael, no matter how much evidence they have, if it was found before the trial and not used in the trial, then it’s fake

  12. heti

    basically profit close to $12k-$15k every month doing an online job. For those of you who are prepared too do easy at home jobs for 2h-5h each day at your house and earn valuable paycheck while doing it…

    Go to the web>>>>>>>>>>>MaxCenter20.Tk

  13. Jason

    This has been proven to be BS. Most supposed evidence against MJ here was just randomly collected from different sources from the internet.
    So the document is in fact false.

    Why do people always believe this BS?!
    People can be so damn gullible, by reading one article and believing the said article is 100 percent true…..

    • Anonymous

      It’s a shame that when someone doesn’t conform to other peoples’s standards they are denounced, subdued or decompressed, or even killed.

  14. Guilty

    Michael Jackson was a Pedophile. Michael Jackson always was a Pedophile. He had Daddy issues and an inherent attraction to children. He had images of naked children in legitimate “art” books because he was smart enough to know where the legal boundaries were with possession of child exploitation material. Have art, adult porn and when desperate stick faces of children on adult porn images. Michael Jackson lured children into his bedroom with fun, games and presents and he then molested them leaving soiled sheets. He used his wealth to pay off the witnesses and for top legal representation.

    Where theres smoke theres fire. Everyone knows Michael Jackson was a pedophile. They knew it while he was alive. The only reason why people continue to defend him is because they cant reconcile in their own minds the thought that they were inspired or touched through music by someone who was a Pedophile and further that their support of his music enabled him in an extended way.

    • Jason

      You must a very gullible individual to believe everything you read in the media. He was in no way a paedophile.
      Find facts from both sides before you judge. Open your mind. Do your own research. A good start would be the court documents which can be found online. I really pity you.

      I used to be a fan when i was very young but have stayed away from his music for twenty years. I am no longer a fan now.
      I just dont judge people from what i have read about them in the media. People like you seem to be very small minded.

    • DC

      You say everyone knows he was a pedophile but who is everyone? The only ones who believe this are the ones who have hated him and his music from day one. Is that the everyone you are referring to? You must be part of that everyone crew. If you are a hater than your opinion is based on your feelings not your logic.

      How convenient for law enforcement to bring all of this out now since Michael Jackson is dead and cannot defend himself. If Michael Jackson was a child molester why didn’t he molest his own children? Why lure children into your home when you have 3 of your own living under your roof? None of this so called “evidence” makes any sense. The man is dead. Move along and leave his children alone because in the end that’s who will get hurt…his children. His children should not have to go through this madness anymore. Enough is enough.

      For the ones that have lied to destroy him….the truth always comes out and God don’t like ugly.

    • Jason

      You really do make me laugh. Believing everything bad written about him. You`re a gullible brainwashed fool. Please enlighten me why it is so obvious.

  15. Guilty

    Jasons the guy who doesn’t call the cops when a grown man next door is sharing his bed with children. Because there must be a reasonable excuse for that. Well done Jason.

    • Jason

      He shared his bed with them yes, but never at the same time.
      Also his bedroom was on two floors. You are deeping yourself into a hole you gullible fool.

      • Jason

        I will also add that he had the parents of the children sleeping in the same room the children were sleeping in too. Go ahead replying with foolish comments.

  16. Danimal

    If it quacks like a duck and looks like a duck… that is all that should have to be said.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Verify Your Humanity *