Lawyer Who Sued Led Zeppelin Suspended From Practicing Law

Lawyer Who Sued Led Zeppelin Suspended From Practicing Law

2 Responses

  1. Lest it be forgotten...

    This is not the case that the media should focus on, but rather, this one:

    http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/high-school-show-choir-inspired-907881

    In view of Constitution of the United States, Article I, § 8, cl. 8, and the Supreme Court of the United States precedents such as Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99 (1880), Mazer v. Stein, 347 U.S. 210 (1954) and Sid & Marty Krofft TV Productions Inc. v. McDonald’s Corporation, 562 F. 2d 1157 (9th Cir. C.A. 1977) (citing Mazer v. Stein, 347 U.S 210, 217-18 (1954) and Baker v. Selden, 101 U.S. 99, 102-3 (1880)), as well as the cases cited in previous posts, among other things, I ask, based on the facts set out in the article posted above, which party will ultimately prevail (if an agreement is not reached outside of court) and the defence vigorously brings forward the full force of the law in defence of that action?

    Reply
  2. danwriter

    “Malofiy had over one hundred sustained objections…” Having your objections sustained by the judge is considered a victory, not a defeat. You meant to say “overruled.”

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Verify Your Humanity *