Was Michael Jackson Just a Dirty Child Molester? A New Lawsuit Says Yes.

mjmask750400

Are all the allegations just made up?  Long after his death, accusations of child molestation continue to dog Michael Jackson’s legacy.  This time, a new victim claims that the King of Pop paid her $900,000 to buy her silence.  And there are checks to prove it.

Was Michael Jackson just a dirty pedophile who got away with it?  Did the King of Pop abuse his celebrity power to repeatedly coerce and silence victims?

Those ugly questions are now surfacing again, thanks to another child molestation accusation.  The latest lawsuit, filed this week, comes from a woman who claims that she was sexually molested as a young girl in the 80s and 90s.

According to the complaint, filed with the Los Angeles County District Court, Jackson repeatedly molested and sexually assaulted the girl at multiple venues.  That includes the Neverland Ranch, the set of ‘Moonwalker,’ Jackson’s Encino mansion, and even the back of Jackson’s limousine.

The abuse started when the girl was just 12, according to the complaint.  The alleged abuse included fondling, forced fellatio, and vaginal intercourse on repeated occasions.  The rapes caused the girl to bleed, according to the legal accusation.

Accusations against Jackson have always involved underage boys, until now.

We don’t know the name of the victim, except that she was an underage female at the time of the purported violations.  That is notable because previous accusers have all been males.  Earlier, a leaked evidence dossier from a 2003 raid of Neverland Ranch revealed piles of pornography, including books containing naked imagery of young boys.

Checks signed by Michael Jackson.

This time, there may be a smoking gun.  Or, several of them.  The woman’s attorney, Vince Finaldi, says that after molesting his client, Michael Jackson personally arranged for massive payments to silence his victim.  Those payments totaled $900,000, and include a $600,000 check apparently written by Jackson himself.

Finaldi says he has proof that these checks were written and signed by Jackson.  And he’s preparing to present them to the court as authentic documents.  More importantly, Finaldi says these payments were not routed through some shadowy third party, but came directly from the pop singer’s account.

It’s a smoking gun that Finaldi says proves that Michael Jackson was a vicious, repeated molester.  And one who used money and power to get away with it.

Does 1 & 2.

The lawsuit is not being directed against the Jackson family.  But two entertainment companies formed by Michael Jackson are the target, as they had the ability to prevent the abuse.  Those companies are merely being listed at ‘Doe 1’ and ‘Doe 2,’ at least for now.

That ultimately sounds like a lawsuit against the Jackson Estate, which may effectively be the same thing.

‘Stockpiles of Porn’ found at Neverland Ranch.

The lawsuit couldn’t come at a worse time.  Earlier this year, Radar Online published a leaked dossier of police evidence, collected by authorities from raid of Neverland Ranch in 2003.  The raid unearthed ‘stockpile of child pornography,’ according to the report, though Michael Jackson defenders noted that most of it wasn’t illegal.

Possibly, though the putrid ‘stockpile’ wasn’t exactly Disney-friendly, shall we say.  The detailed evidence contained S&M, strange collages of children’s faces pasted on adult bodies, and other seriously deranged material alongside graphic DVDs and computer files.

Collections containing naked images of children, particularly boys, were also found in the raid.  It’s unclear why the Santa Barbara Sheriff’s Office didn’t pursue criminal charges against the singer, or publish the dossier.

“The documents exposed Jackson as a manipulative, drug-and-sex-crazed predator who used blood, gore, sexually explicit images of animal sacrifice and perverse adult sex acts to bend children to his will,” one Radar source explained.  “[Jackson] also had disgusting and downright shocking images of child torture, adult and child nudity, female bondage, and sadomasochism.”

Radar Online was since sued by the Jackson family for accusations that the pop star molested his own nephews.  The dossier has since been pulled down.  That raises some questions about authenticity of the leak, though the Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office did not deny that genuineness of the document.

After repeated questioning, the Office refused to go beyond a limited statement:

“Some of the documents appear to be copies of reports that were authored by Sheriff’s Office personnel as well as evidentiary photographs taken by Sheriff’ Office personnel interspersed with content that appears to be obtained off the internet or through unknown sources. “

Jackson family on the counter-attack.

Howard Weitzman, attorney for the Jackson Estate, says the claims are baseless.  And worse, just vulturous activity by money-hungry lawyers.  “This is yet another attempt to hit the lottery by suing the Estate of Michael Jackson more than seven years after Michael’s death and close to 30 years after these incidents supposedly occurred,” Weitzman declared in a statement.

“We believe this claim was created from whole cloth and is without any merit.”

Weitzman also noted that Finaldi’s law firm, Manly, Stewart & Finaldi, has filed similar cases like these in the past.  That includes a high-profile allegation from choreographer Wade Robson, who said Jackson repeatedly molested him as a boy.  “It’s also no coincidence that this woman is represented by the same attorneys involved in two other frivolous claims against the estate,” Weitzman added.

88 Responses

  1. Lawl

    LOL! Those checks/notes look fresh af, 30 years my ass! The writing on them doesn’t even match MJ’s. And why is this woman conveniently anonymous? She probably doesn’t even exist. Nice try. Move along.

    Reply
  2. Lawl

    BTW, there was no child porn/animal torture found at Neverland. This rumor was debunk time and time again. Like the vendetta driven prosecutors would let that slip. Possession of child porn in itself is illegal. And LOL, don’t sugar coat it, ALL of the books were legal, not “most” of them. What they REALLY found were straight porn and two art books sent by a fan.

    Reply
    • Tom Johnson

      I read a comment by Jackson’s lawyer that they found adult S&M and bondage porn. What does that say about his sexual preferences?

      Reply
      • Lawl

        Well, if we’re gonna go into his sexual preference, I read that he owned tons of straight porn magazines, never got over losing Diane Ross, and privately confided that he desperately wanted a relationship with a woman. I would like to see this statement you’re addressing.

        Reply
  3. John

    I don’t get why, it’s taken until now, 7 and a bit years to say anything, it’s just a desperate and pathetic attempt to claim compensation, I know MJ was one of a kind and was heavily misunderstood individual but this is below the belt, and his family, think about his family, them, reading this childish nonsense about their son, brother, father, just makes me sick about how far someone will go just to get attention.

    Reply
      • Michael

        Why don’t you stop spreading absolute BS before claims are proven either way.

        No other suit brought against him had any merit, but you FAILED to bring that up because it didn’t fit your article. Both of those cases were 100% fabricated, and you would have known that if you actually researched anything before you typed this.

        Claim 1 – father tried to extort MJ. Son later came out to say the father made him lie about it, and not to mention key pieces of the kids story didn’t line up.

        Claim 2 – the mother actually contacted a lawyer BEFORE her kid ever met MJ on how to sue him for molestation, etc.

        If you’re going to report anything, research and think before sending it out into the world.

        Reply
        • Paul Resnikoff
          Paul Resnikoff

          The United States has a rule of law. That means you can sue someone who has harmed you, and an impartial judge and jury can determine if the claims have merit. If they’re made up, there are remedies built into the legal system to attempt to compensate the defendant against baseless actions.

          It is a federal crime to lie under oath, to a judge or jury. Or, to submit fabricated evidence. If that was the case, as has been suggested here, I’d argue without submitting hard examination or facts, why not let the courts decide this matter.

          Maybe these allegations have merit. Maybe they don’t. It’s now up to a judge and jury to make their decision.

          Reply
        • Kate

          Actually the child never came out and said he lied. This is untrue. No one has ever gone back on their accusations.

          Reply
          • Tom Johnson

            He also refused to testify for the prosecution during Jackson’s 2005 trial. Testifying would have gone a long way toward proving his own claims were truthful and not extortion. And it would have helped the 2005 “victim”. By 2005 he was an adult

          • Sarah

            MJ FREAKS ARE NON STOP LIARS! LIKE LEADER MJ, LIKE FOLLOWER! WHAT HYPOCRITES,calling everything exposing mj lies about mj, yet defending the Biggest Liar known to man, MJ himself! That whole LIE that one of MJ’s victims has recanted his claims has been DEBUNKED, but these pervy mj fans keep repeating the LIE, in full knowledge that they are lying! The lie, like may others, were purposely created in mj fan forums, then they hope to spread them to an uninformed public. In fact, that very same victim had very reliable, hard core evidence of molestation by Wacko Jackass! Mj had initially intended to fight the charges assuming there was no evidence. But upon HEARING the boys evidence, Mj and crew QUICKLY backed down! Even MJ’s lawyers ADMITTED this, calling boy’s EVIDENCE, “the purple elephant in the room”! They admitted they wanted to HUSH this kid and make him go away. That doesn’t happen for “liars”, and people with frivolous cases! They then PAID millions to make this victim silenced. MJ camp also threatened this boy’s family, and ran them out of business, to help keep them silent.They did this for many other victims of mj too, victims cases kept sealed in court documents. There has been many, many victims over the years! Well more than 7, recently revealed at least 20 came forwards, documented in court documents alone. Not counting victims who had yet to come forwards, like this woman in this article. Too bad, because had that victim, along with MANY other PAID victims stayed the course, these freaks couldn’t be still spreading lies to this day against the victims of MJ. MJ FREAKS HAVE NO CREDIBILITY, THEY ARE NON-STOP LIARS LIKE FAKE, MANIPULATIVE CON-ARTIST MJ, AND ARE BULLIES.BEWARE OF THEIR LIES.

          • Harlene

            Kate: Two Grand Juries investigated MJ over Jordan and determined there was NO evidence to indict him. Jordan was asked to testify and supeoned in 2005 and he refused and then he left the cournty. It was NOT Jordan did not originally accusedd MJ, his father Evan did. Evan went to a lawyer to sue MJ for 20 million rather than reporting the alleged abuse to police! Evan wanted MJ to front him 20 million for his screen play Men in Tights which MJ refused. Two Books are available about the Chandler case “Was Michael Jackson Framed by Mary Fischer who was a “legitimate reporter” and after months of research she concluded he was, and Redemption by Geraldine Hughes who was the Secretary for Rothman the attorney that sued MJ for Evan Chandler. She was privy to information most people would not know and she concluded MJ was the victim of Extortion. Michael had filed an official extortion report with police against Evan Chandler. Evan is recorded as saying “I will ruin his career if he does not go along with my plan.” That is on youtube. The “plan” was to get 20 million from MJ. Jordan never accused MJ until after Evan a dentist had Jordan injected with Sodium Amital during a dental procedure. That drug is not used for dental procedures it causes one to be very influenced by suggestion. Evan Chandler was in a heated custody battle with his ex June Swartz and was jealous of the time she and MJ spent with Jordan. June Swartz testified in 2005 saying Evan was in severe financial distress when he filed the suit on MJ. She told the court Evan also wanted MJ to build a wing on his home. MJ vehemently denied he harmed Jordan. Most people who thought their child was molested would have reported it to police first! Jordan later filed for emancipation from his parents Evan and June. As a teen Jordan filed Assault and Battery charges on his father Evan. Jordan Chandler killed himself a couple of month after MJ died! Coincidence or Guilt! June Swartz told the court part of the settlement went to her even though she was not the one accusing MJ it was her ex Evan but she said she had not seen her son Jordan for over 10 years after getting the money! Why would a child whose parent tried to force him to say he was abused and got 20 million from MJ insurance decide to Emancipate himself from his parents? The reality was there was NO evidence MJ harmed Jordan. One has to look at how the media continually misreported on these cases for profit and how this affected the perception of MJ.

        • Sarah

          LIAR, CASES WITHOUT “MERIT”, ARE PROMPTLY ‘DISMISSED’ IN COURT. NONE OF MJ’S CASES WERE EVER DISMISSED, OR CONSIDERED TO HAVE LACK OF MERIT. INSTEAD, MJ DID WHAT ALL RICH CRIMINALS DO, PAY MILLIONS TO HUSH AND SILENCE HIS VICTIMS ALONG WITH THEIR DAMNING EVIDENCE.

          AND YOU ARE PURPOSELY TWISTING THIS NEW CASE WITH AN OLDER, THERE IS NO DAD ACCUSED OF EXTORTION (BY MJ’S LAWYERS OF COURSE), EVEN INVOLVED IN THIS NEW LADY’S CASE!

          AS FOR THE CASE YOU ARE REFERRING TO, YOU MJ FREAKS ARE A BUNCH OF INBRED, REDUNDANT LIARS, REPEATING THE SAME DEBUNKED LIES AND MYTHS OVER AND OVER.

          Jordy NEVER recanted anything, neither has any other mj victim. That was a MYTH created by mj freaks in their fan forums. Biggest LIARS on the planet. And they complain about tabloids???!

          MJ FREAKS ARE NON STOP LIARS! LIKE LEADER MJ, LIKE FOLLOWER! WHAT HYPOCRITES,calling everything exposing mj lies about mj, yet defending the Biggest Liar known to man, MJ himself! That whole LIE that one of MJ’s victims has recanted his claims has been DEBUNKED, but these pervy mj fans keep repeating the LIE, in full knowledge that they are lying! The lie, like may others, were purposely created in mj fan forums, then they hope to spread them to an uninformed public. In fact, that very same victim had very reliable, hard core evidence of molestation by Wacko Jackass! Mj had initially intended to fight the charges assuming there was no evidence. But upon HEARING the boys evidence, Mj and crew QUICKLY backed down! Even MJ’s lawyers ADMITTED this, calling boy’s EVIDENCE, “the purple elephant in the room”! They admitted they wanted to HUSH this kid and make him go away. That doesn’t happen for “liars”, and people with frivolous cases! They then PAID millions to make this victim silenced. MJ camp also threatened this boy’s family, and ran them out of business, to help keep them silent.They did this for many other victims of mj too, victims cases kept sealed in court documents. There has been many, many victims over the years! Well more than 7, recently revealed at least 20 came forwards, documented in court documents alone. Not counting victims who had yet to come forwards, like this woman in this article. Too bad, because had that victim, along with MANY other PAID victims stayed the course, these freaks couldn’t be still spreading lies to this day against the victims of MJ. MJ FREAKS HAVE NO CREDIBILITY, THEY ARE NON-STOP LIARS LIKE FAKE, MANIPULATIVE CON-ARTIST MJ, AND ARE BULLIES.BEWARE OF THEIR LIES PEOPLE.

          Reply
          • Harlene

            Nothing you stated was accurate. MJ fans who have commented encluding myself have tried to be respectful to other commentors even if we have differing opinions. The fans have not resorted to name calling and have remained civil. There are many books written by very ethical reporters who report facts and are unbiased in their research about MJ that are available. The tabloids generally have been proven to NOT report facts about MJ and are not a good source of information. Some sites online say they are suposedly about Facts on MJ when in reality they are only old debunked tabloid articles. Here is a list of books that are unbiased and some very well respected authors who have written about MJ and some from people who actually knew him since childhood and witnessed some of the accusers of MJ. The Michael Jackson Conspriacy by Aphrodite Jones which is based on facts and trial transcipts, she was actually present in the court room during the trial and her book shows why MJ based on testimoney in the trial was found Not Guilty and goes into some of the underhanded things done by the DA in that case as well as how the media misreported the facts of the case; My Friend Michael by Frank Casio who had known MJ since he was five and and whose whole family knew MJ and he was around some of the accusers and witnessed their actions and MJ’s actions around them and concluded MJ was not guilty; Redemption by Geraldine Hughes who was the secretary who worked for Rothman the attorney that sued MJ for Evan Chandler on behalf of his son Jordan and she had first had knowledge of what went on between the attorney and Chandler and the courts etc, and concluded MJ was the Victim of Extortion; Untouchable, the strange and tragic life of Michael Jackson by Rolling Stone Editor Randle Sullivan. Randle was not a fan of MJ but he did a great amount of research on his life and the 2005 trial and concluded Michael was not guilty of the accusations and it points out a lot of unsubstantiated rumors about MJ he also has in chapter written by Tom Mesereau about the facts of what happened in the 2005 case; The Genius of Michael Jackson by Steve Knopper a well researched book which goes into a lot of detail about MJ from childhood but his research on the allegations against MJ also result in his concluding there was NO case against Michael Jackson; The Anatomy of a Scam online goes into detail about the Chandler and Arizo cases and shows what really happened and how Janet Arvizo had history of sueing businesses alleging Sexual or Physical Abuse, one was JC Penny’s and Tower Records her husband “David Arvizo admitted in an affidavit that Janet coached her two sons to lie.” She settled the cases for 150,000. She was charged and had plead guilty to Welfare Fraud during the 2005 case against Michael; Was Michael Jackson Framed by Marie Fisher was well researched and concluded in the Chandler case MJ was framed.

          • Paul

            Sarah.. Shut the Fuck up… Ok and do me a favor… Ur fucking stupid ok and get the Fuck out

      • Harlene

        Paul I agree. I also think the media needs to stop printing anything about this case until it does go to trial and is decided on. Why should the jury pool be tainted by the media. You just told the world in your Headline “Michael was a dirty molester” and this person has checks to PROVE she was paid off! That has not been proven in a court of law. The names are blacked out on those checks and you do not know who wrote the checks. There was a great article written about how the media totally lied about the 2005 case against MJ titled “The Most Shameful Episode in Journalistic History” by Charles Thomson . No doubt the misinformation played a role in the negative views about MJ. Even the conservative Matt Dredge ran a show and interviewed an LA reporter about how the Media like Court TV etc was failing to tell the public the lies the accusers were caught in during Cross Examination and the number of time the accusers committed perjury. MJ is gone he cannot be physically hurt. But his image can be for profit from someone, and his children IMO are the victims of abuse by all the media outlets that intentionally use MJ’s name as click bate to attract haters of him with false and misleading information. He was and will always be the Greatest Entertainer Ever, you cannot take that away from him. Do you not think for a minute that his race, the fact he was renowned world wide and he spread messages of peace around the world and the fact he was so wealthy and generous played a role in the accusations against him. Don’t you think there are people who would love to see a black successful wealthy person brought down even in death. But since MJ is gone the people these awful and unproven allegations hurt are Michael Jackson Children, they are the real victims of constant abuse, especially if these accusation are proven false as in the case of the Arvizo’s. Wade already told the world when he was 23 MJ never touched him, and continued to praise MJ and wanted to emulate him but after he did not get the job with Cirque Du Soliel now he wants “1.3 Billion” dollars from the estate claiming they should have protected him even though it was him mom that contacted the MJ Firm wanting to meet with MJ not vice versa and she even admitted she went into MJ bedroom with Wade and approved of him and his sister being in there and he wants the world to believe he committed perjury in 2005. If you believe as many do he told the truth in 2005 and all the times before 2005 and after knowing he defended MJ even after he passed then that means he is lying now. It was proven in court the Arviz’s and Jason Francia were lying. BYW Committing Perjury is a crime in itself. Why work if you can sue Michael Jackson. Money !

        Reply
        • Sarah

          THERE’S NO WAY that Wade’s mother could’ve originally known the danger she was putting her son in. IT WAS MJ AND COMP. WHO ARRANGED FOR THE ROBSON’S TO COME TO, AND TO REMAIN LEGALLY IN US; SO MJ COULD HAVE UNFETTERED ACCESS TO MOLEST THE BOY. OH, THERE ARE MANY BLACK PEDOPHILES TOO, SO BEING BLACK DOESN’T MAKE MJ ANY LESS A PEDOPHILE NOR EXCUSE HIM.

          SO FUNNY, IRONIC HOW MJ, WHO TRIED SO HARD TO RUN FROM ANY SIGN OF BLACKNESS AND ALL ASSOCIATION, AND WAS RACIST HIMSELF TO BLACKS, TRIED TO PULL THE RACE CARD WHENEVER HE GOT IN TROUBLE, LOL! MASTER MANIPULATOR.

          Reply
          • Harlene

            It was over a year after MJ met Wade briefly during a dance contest in Europe that Joy Robson brought her family to the US for a vacation that she arranged. She told the court she contacted MJ’s business and asked for him to call her. She wanted to go to MJ’s home with her children. By then the investigation of Chandler had started and was ALL over the news. She and Wade and his sister defended MJ publicly at that time. Wade also acknowledged that many times MJ was not at Neverland when they visited. Wade and his sister and Mother said they all went into MJ bedroom which was huge. Wade said he had to have his parents permission to go by himself and so did Maculay. There were never sleepovers like the media intentionall fabricated. The Corporation did not contact her and try to get her to come to the US or to meet MJ. Hopefully all of this comes out in the trial if the media stops trying to help this lawyer force a settlement 1.3 billion dollar settle by publishing not so accurate information.

        • Mary

          THEY TOLD THE WORLD MJ WAS A DIRTY CHILD MOLESTER BECAUSE THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT HE WAS. Being guilty doesn’t automatically place people in jail, a court process must be completed first. But MJ is GUILTY as sin, as evidence shows. You freaks are pissing in your pants because the evidence is mounting against MJ publicly, so just like MJ, you want it ‘silenced’, lol. You can’t sit up in fan forums and live your lies anymore. . Media shouldn’t give MJ’s case any special treatment, they should report the news on him like for anyone else. However, media MAY CONSIDER IN FUTURE WHETHER THEY WILL ALLOW THESE LYING MJ FREAKS TO COMMENT ON THEIR ARTICLES. TURN OFF COMMENTS. THAT SOUNDS LIKE BETTER SOLUTION TO ME.

          If you’re so upset about all this, place the blame where it belongs. ON MJ HIMSELF. Had he not molested kids, none of this had happened.

          Reply
          • Harlene

            Most cases like this are never reported on other than to mention the case briefly in the paper. Some papers try to only report facts not their opinion and make it look like fact or report totally false information like certain reproters were known to do about Michael for thier whole career. It is one thing to say another person has been added to this claim but to say “they have proof” when that has not been determined is false reporting. The checks TMZ have prove NOTHING. I have never seen a newspaper report all the Xrated information about any abuse case as if it was a Xrated story for everyone to read encluding children as they do intentionally about MJ. The media abuses his children and are heartless. Teenager’s go to the web to look up info on MJ. Many are fans and it is horrid they are exposed to the Xrated gargabe that is only at this point an accusation and has not been proven in court! It is truly unethical reporting. None of that is necessary to live up to reporting Wade changed his story after 8 years of praising MJ and has filed a suit alleging abuse now, follow up on what has happens in court will be reported. Case went to court Judge denied Wade Creditors Claim . The END! That is all that is needed. It has already been proven when anyone is accused of sexual abuse and found NOT guilty it ruins their career and has a lifetime impact. That was proven with the MacMartin Day Care Trial, MJ was found Not Guilty and it affected him. I understand there are more than likely a number of racists that just hate MJ or people jealous of him that dislike for for his wealth etc, and nothing anyone says would change their mind. There is possibly a racist factor to the false allegations and misreporting about MJ. IMO. The Tabloids have published so many untruths about the MJ case they should have been put out of business. They have NO ethics. JMO. I see cases daily of children that have been killed by parent who beat their child to death that do no get the attention a accustion gets with MJ. Where are these child abuse sympathizers when it is a case of horrid phsycial abuse? Do they not suffer ptsd. They cannot wait 30 years later and sue their perpetrator even if there was medical records.

      • Amber

        Well, jury decided in 2005 and two grand juries decided in 1994 (And Michael is not here to defend himself) YET some fools still keep bring it up.

        Reply
      • Chris

        Not to be mean or anything, but one that picture is very rude and is a form of bullying. He did not look like that and body dismorphia is a thing (he was never happy with the way he looked an thought he looked better after surgeries). Secondly, these articles cause severe depression. Why not write about how he was not guilty in the 2005 case.

        Reply
  4. Kyle

    “Anything for money”!!!

    So, this woman’s lawyer is the same lawyer who is representing the other two ALLEGED victims? No coincidence there! All three ‘victims’ waited not only years after the so called abuse happened to file a complaint but also after MJ is dead and can’t defend himself. No coincidence there! Did she all of a sudden wake up one day and only then realise that the ‘abuse’ happened, like apparently the other alleged victim did?

    MJ (apparently) had quite the appetite when it came to sex! Apparently he was into skinny, almost anorexic looking woman and would frequently visit female strip clubs dressed in disguise aswell as hire prostitutes..oh but hang on apparently he only liked gay men so that cant be right..oh and he apparently got off on watching animal torture videos..don’t forget he had a ‘lust’ for young boys.. now apparently he was into young girls. So, which was it? Anorexic woman? Prostitutes? Gay men? Young boys? Animals? Young girls? He apparently was pretty much into everyone and everything when it came to sex. Oh and then apparently he was asexual aswell. Guess he just couldn’t make up his mind!!

    Like MJ himself said, “The more often you hear a lie the more you believe it”, and the more lurid the lie (child molestation for example) the more people are inclined to believe it without even looking at the facts. But when it comes to facts, if people don’t like you, the majority will have already made up their mind regarding what the truth is and no matter how credible the facts might be nothing will change their view as they don’t want to admit to themselves that they just might be wrong.

    “PREJUDICE IS IGNORANCE” – MJ

    Reply
    • Harlene

      I guess the reporter never really looked closely at the checks that this Anonymous 42 year old womans attorney is saying were payoffs to her. None of the checks indicate they were processed by the bank. None show the back of the check where a person signed the check. The $600,000. Cashiere Check is not signed by Michael Jackson and the name of the person it was paid to is “Blacked Out” conveniently and suspiciously if you are trying to prove you were paid illegally by someone. That check does not say as normal checks would “Pay $600,000 dollars, instead it says to pay #19 GNB 600,000.” The check for $150,000 the payors name is again blacked out but underneath that is says C/O Breslauer, Jacobson, Rutman and Sherman which was a Financial Management Company used by many Entertainers to invest there funds and manage their money. The Stub says the check was for disbursments. The payee name on the check was also blacked out. These items prove NOTHING. Why hide the name of the person who wrote the check if you are saying Michael Jackson did it, or hide the persons name it was being paid to if you are claim it was hush money and sueing the estate? Tell the judge/jury that you can’t identify the person it was paid to and the check never cleared a bank and explain why did the person it was written to still has the check and why you black out the payors name! Once a check is cashed it goes back to the bank it was written on! This person is 42 now and those checks date indicte she would have been 18 or 19 when the checks were written. Two to three years after the supposed incidents. Why didn’t she report this to the Police in 1993 and 2003 when a national search for victims of Michael Jackson was put out? The photo of MJ on the TMZ site with this person’s face blacked out shows supposedly MJ’s hand on her shoulder and he has the other hand in his pocket. An enlargement of the picture shows two hands on her shoulder not one. The handwriting does no look like MJ’s. There are just too many irregularites in this allegation. Why would an Ethical lawyer take this case to the Tabloids unless they are trying to try the case in the court of public opinion not the Judical court and trying to force a settlement without going to court! Isn’t it odd that his person just appears shortly after the Estate announces it just finalized the sale of Sony/Atv Catalog for $750 million! Wade told the world under oarth repeatedly MJ never touched him. He tried to get a job with Cirque Du Soliel and made a youtube vidoe in 2012 bragging about it and saying how wonderful MJ was. Then when he didn’t get the job a year later he changes his story and wants 1.3 Billion dollars. Wade’s Mom underoath defended MJ. The Chandler case was proven to be a scam by people who were close to the case and the Arizo’s were proven in court to be liars and out for money not from just MJ but from JC Penneys and other entertainers. It is obvious case this is about MONEY not abuse!

      Reply
      • Kate

        Jordan’s case was never ever proved to be a scam. He was silenced. Even MJ’s own lawyer said the settlement was to silence jordie and avoid a criminal trial. Jordie has never ever recanted his story.

        If it was his dad, he would’ve come out and said somehing but he didn’t. And who cares if he didn’t testify in the trial? Why would he? It was 12 years later, he probably wanted to move on with his life, get some peace. Fans stalked him for years. Being back in the spotlight is something I’m sure he didn’t want to.

        Reply
        • A

          Uh, the Chandler case was/is *beyond* a scam and was proven to be so over and over one in Ray Chandler’s own book where it talks about how Evan was going to use allegations of his own son against MJ to get the latter to fund his film company or give him multi millions of dollars. Even youtube has a recording of his conversation. Geraldine Hughs book is another source as well as a couple other researched sources which includes Mary Fischer’s “Was Michael Jackson Framed” and not to mention a grand jury not being able to indict MJ because Jordan could not give the proper description of MJ’s intimate body parts. The cops subjected him to a dang strip search for crying out loud, and if the details matched MJ would have been cuffed and taken to jail. Not only did he not give a matching description, he was flat out wrong saying MJ was circumcised when the official autopsy report showed he was not. “Silenced” my BIG toe.

          JC said even at age 12 that he was afraid of cross examination if this goes to trial. Nothing else. Here comes the 2005 trial with every opportunity for he (and Robson and Safechuck) to put this long fanged salivating predator behind bars and they all either chose to testify for the defense, or in J’s case, foght the prosecution and not show up at all. You may find that “understandable” but to many of us and the courts, that diminishes his credibility big time. Let us ALSO not forget that if J was to show up to testify for the prosecution, the defense had already lined up J’s friends and close acquaintences who were ready to testify for THEM that Jordan told them that MJ didn’t do anything, and that his PARENTS wanted money.

          Reply
  5. HelloHello

    Next time, back up your research with facts and evidence. The man is long gone but why would his children have to grow up facing constant groundless accusations and mockery about their deceased father? There was never child pornography found in Jackson’s possession. Do your own research, the FBI has the files online, unless you consider art as illegal, in which case I should also be arrested for owning a copy of Nabokov’s Lolita and “The 120 days in sodom”. Also, who is this woman? Why did she keep coming back to Neverland after being molested the first time? Why did her parents accept paychecks and why did she remember all this 30 years later? And last, is it coincidental that she’s coming forward now, the same time that Robson & Safechuck are preparing their own lawsuits against MJ? And what about the fact that the three of them are being represented by the same lawyer?

    Reply
    • Kate

      No a coincidence, exactly what happens. There was no child porn but he had art books with naked kids, had pre-teens sleeping in his beds for intensive times for most of his life, was accused 7 times of innapropriate behavior. Where there is smoke……

      It is all so obvious.

      Reply
  6. Ema

    My opinion is atypical.Why? MJ was a gifted child ,whose facial metmorphoses has generate interest more than normal.Followed step by step ,incited and blamed ,he reach to commit ,maybe wrongdoings.Statements can anyone but the truth is only one..His naivety,his kindness had helped to veer toward an unhappy ending.

    Reply
      • Harlene

        That is another Tabloid Junkie website. MJ Facts does not report facts. It is a Michael Jackson hate site IMO and deceives people by saying it has facts about MJ. If you show them with facts and publications they have printed a lie they delete your comment. They are only there to spread false information mostly from old tabloid stories that have been debunded. It is really sad a site can claim to be about facts when it isn’t. They get away with this because MJ is deceased. There are no laws that protect the deceased from Slander. In the Eyes of the court since they are dead they can’t be slandered. MJ Facts knows this and most Tabloid media know this and probably lawyers know this. Demand and Support AdLlaw (Anti-Defamation League Advocates) so to allow families of the deceased to sue the press for slandering their loved ones.

        Reply
  7. Anonymous

    You ppl are the worst,who cares who and what he was attracted to,if he had a sexual sickness why does that matter, WE TEND TO FORGET ALL THE GOOD HE DID LIKE WE ARE THE WORLD!!! This broad either looking for attention or a $23 million settlement clearly RIP KOP

    Reply
  8. carol

    i am so tired of ppl trying to make a buck off of michael jackson…i dont understand why all of these allegations werent made when the alleged abuse happened..as for the so called female victim..shes truly pathetic. why all the secrecy. why isnt she brave enough to go public. oh thats right bc its nothing but a pathetic attempt to get her 15 minutes of fame..in pretty sure nobody is going to write personal checks to buy silence. all these losers should try getting a real job instead of trying to make money from a dead man who also just happens to be the greatest entertainer ever didnt believe it theb dont believe it now

    Reply
  9. julia

    This is so stupid she had over 40 years to tesify. This is quite Suspicious after hewas just announced the richest celebrity of all time. This just doesn’t make sense smh

    Reply
  10. Amber

    This is stupid. Michael ha a trial and the DA searched everything on Jackson from 1993 that present time even setting up a hotline. Jackson’s bank accounts, computers, all his tapes, cds in his home, phones, etc were investigated and they found NOTHING even with rumors of other payoffs that the tabloid media put out at that time. Let this mess go. And these lawyers are scum and representing her long with the others who defended Jackson for years even after he died until they heard about all the money the Estates was making. This needs to stop. Also, when there is this many lies an inconsistency, it only prove one thing. IT IS A BIG LIE.

    Reply
    • Sarah

      ACTUALLY, the police raids uncovered MUCH evidence against Jacko. That was what got exposed by radaronline. MJ’s lying money-grubbing nephews tried to get these revealing bombshells removed from public access by falsely accusing radar online of saying mj molested THEM, distracting from main topic. There was warning alarms found in his bedroom and its hallways to warn him of people approaching. Surely his activities with children were just “innocent” to make him install those alarms, lol, NOT! There was found nude pictures of boys in suggestive positions (child p o r n), pornography, child erotica, and other books known to kept by pedophiles. And MORE EVIDENCE. Boy, all this sounds like mj was so “innocent” LOL! And there’s much more. This evidence was found, even after MJ had got tipped off about the raid from insider in police department, and cars with boxes full of documents, books, and other things were observed leaving his residence shortly before the raids. MONEY IS POWER, and Pedophile mj had lots of it!

      Reply
  11. Harlene

    There are no laws that protect the deceased from slander or libel! Also it is very rare for any prosecutor to ever be disciplined. Tom Sneddon had a history of lawsuits filed on him for abuse of power and malicious prosecution. Zonen offered to help Wade by giving him any files from 2005 case according to one website. Statistics show that perjury is a charge not often filed.
    Here is a very small portion of Wade’s “60 pages of Testimony” given Under Oath in 2005 when he was 23 years old.
    Q. Do you consider Michael Jackson your friend?
    A. Yes.
    Q. Do you consider him a close friend?
    A. Yes.
    Q. You’re aware of the allegations in this case, are you not?
    A. Yes.
    Q. And are you aware, as you sit here today, that there’s been allegations that Mr. Jackson molested you?
    A. Yes.
    Q. Mr. Robson, did Michael Jackson ever molest you at any time?
    A. Absolutely not.
    Q. Mr. Robson, did Michael Jackson ever touch you in a sexual way?
    A. Never, No.
    Q. Mr. Robson, has Mr. Jackson ever inappropriately touched any part of your body at any time?
    A. No.
    Wade was the first defense witness called. If MJ had really molested Wade for seven years as he claims now, do you really think MJ would have asked him to be the first witness to testify on his behalf knowing the amount of grilling he would go through by the Prosecution Mr. Sneddon and Ron Zonen who clearly wanted MJ to be found guilty of anything no matter how trivial!?

    Reply
  12. Kate

    All these cases should definitely go before a judge and jury. MJ fans are still screaming his innocence even though in total 7 people have come forward citing inappropriate behavior on his part over the past 20 years.

    People keep waving things off because he was aquitted for 1 of his accusers, doesn’t mean every other new claim shouldn’t be taken seriously.

    I believe he was not at all innocent but think the victims and MJ estate should be given a fair trial to find out the truth. If these boys and now girl were abused they deserve to be taken seriously and if he/ his company is found guilty should pay substantial damages.

    Reply
    • Adela Corazon

      Because all accusations are questionable not one is at all reliable. His fans read other materials other than tabloid junk. People are not blindly defending him.

      Reply
    • Michael

      Oh Kate, are you just Paul Resnikoff posting under an alias so “he isn’t alone” in thinking this article has any merit?

      You must have tmz as your main source of news too.

      Again, if you want to throw ideas out there, it’s best to research them and substantiate with proof, otherwise, you look foolish and discredit your thoughts.

      Reply
    • Sarah

      Mj freaks are non-stop liars just like mj!! They make up lies and try to BULLY his victims into silence. There’s more than enough mountains of evidence against mj, and more keeps coming! So far, more than 7 victims can be documented in court records, at least 20 victims, all paid for their SILENCE by monster MJ. More victims are going to keep coming forwards because that’s what mj was, a serial pedophile!Can’t believe that PEDOPHILE/CHILD RAPIST escaped justice so long, thanks to his MONEY.

      Reply
      • Harlene

        Sarah: A video appeared online after MJ died with a picture of Jordan and it was saying the person was Jordan and he said he lied about MJ. It later came out that was not truly Jordan. Many fans may not have seen the information that video was not real. Those fans are basing the information on a real video that came out. Jordan did refuse to testify in the 2005 trial and Sneddon supeoned him and Jordan left the country. That is a fact. It is a fact Michael Jackson filed a complaint against Evan Chandler for Extortion that is discussed in the book Redemption and Was MJ framed and other books about these cases. It is a fact Evan wanted money from MJ for a screen play. He was in financial distress when he sued MJ and that is on court record. It is a fact Evan, Jordans father killed himself not long after MJ died. No one is trying to twist the new allegations with old ones they are only bringing up information of past accustions. Personally I looked at the checks that TMZ showed the attorney filed as evidence for the woman he refused to identify. None of those checks have been processed by the bank if you are familiar with what happens with checks in the processing department.. The name of the person they were written to is blacked out. No one knows who they are written to. The payors name is blacked out so there is NO way to know they were written by Michael, his signature is not on any of them. When a casheir check is filled out by the bank the amount would say Pay: 600,000.00 dollars. The Casheir Check the lawyer gave to TMZ says pay to and the name is blacked out and where it says the amount to (not who to pay) it says Pay: # 19 GNB 600,000,00. dollars. To my knowledge there is no money form of #19 GNB in money and I looked all over the internet for such a thing. No name of payor, no name of payee and a few stubs that say they were paid “disbursments” by a Financail Managment Company. I am sorry that does NOT prove anything. Her name is not being given! The public really knows nothing, except the attorney is claiming the these were from MJ and to the anonymous a person. When Evan sued for Jordan his name was published, so were all the people in the Arvizo case, Wade’s name was published by the Attorney in his case so why would the Attorney make a 42 year old woman claiming something happened 30 years ago anonymous. At some point the defense has a right to know! Can you not see how some people regardless of if they were fans or not would be leary of this information? At this stage these are only allegations, that does not mean it is factual. That is why there is a trial to determine if there really is enough evidence to go to trial or to find someone at fault. Both parties have the right to discovery of information to help their defense. Frivilous lawsuits are filed daily in the US. Sadly what you do not understand is people that are falsely charged that do not have the money for decent representation often plead guilty when they aren’t. There are hundreds of cases of wrongful convictions. The legal system unfortunately requires people to have a lot of money for decent defense! The public defenders officers are underfundered and can’t afford to represent people like they should. I am happy if someone can afford decent legal defense. The FBI investigated MJ at the request of Sneddon for 10 years, they even went overseas and they found NOTHING. They went thru his computers and found nothing. Wade told the court MJ did nothing to him repeatedly and continued to praise MJ after he died and when NO one was asking him to, until he did not get the Cirque Du Soleil job. Safechuch could have came out in 2005 but did not want to be part of it. He only came out after Wade went to the media asking for anyone. I know DD has said there are 100’s of people molested by MJ but the evidence is not out there. You said he paid off people but where is your evidence? Anyone can say anything but that does not make it fact. Go online and look up False Accusation of Sexual Abuse and there are plenty of articles about it. It does exist. It is not the norm, but it happens. Why hasen’t this annonymous woman come forward sooner. This woman was 18-19 when those checks were written! She was not a child. She was an adult, did she forget what they were written to her for, is that why she did not respond in 93 and 2005 to police request for victims of MJ. These questions should be asked regardless of your opinion of MJ. They should be asked in court as part of a fair trial.

        Reply
  13. Sarah

    MJ FREAKS NEVER STOP LYING! LIKE LEADER MJ, LIKE FOLLOWER! WHAT HYPOCRITES,calling everything exposing mj lies about mj, yet defending the Biggest Liar known to man, MJ himself! That whole LIE that one of MJ’s victims has recanted his claims has been DEBUNKED, but these pervy mj fans keep repeating the LIE, in full knowledge that they are lying! The lie, like may others, were purposely created in mj fan forums, then they hope to spread them to an uninformed public. In fact, that very same victim had very reliable, hard core evidence of molestation by Wacko Jackass! Mj had initially intended to fight the charges assuming there was no evidence. But upon HEARING the boys evidence, Mj and crew QUICKLY backed down! Even MJ’s lawyers ADMITTED this, they wanted to HUSH this kid and make him go away. That doesn’t happen for “liars”, and people with frivolous cases! They then PAID millions to make this victim silenced. They did this for many other victims of mj too, victims cases kept sealed in court documents. There has been many, many victims over the years! Well more than 7, recently revealed at least 20 came forwards, in court documents alone. Too bad, because had this victim, along with MANY other PAID victims stayed the course, these freaks couldn’t be still spreading lies to this day against the victims of MJ. MJ FREAKS HAVE NO CREDIBILITY, THEY ARE NON-STOP LIARS LIKE FAKE, MANIPULATIVE CON-ARTIST MJ, AND ARE BULLIES.BEWARE OF THEIR LIES.

    Reply
    • Sarah

      Also, head over to mjfacts.com, to get actual court documents and other documented legal evidence against MJ.

      Reply
      • Read Michael

        These are not Facts. Since you do not know what the word “fact” means, here it is: “facts are items that are known to exit” (definition from Oxford Dictionary). The known FACTS are: Michael Jackson has written hundreds of songs for us to enjoy and to inspire us to make this world a better place. Read Michael’s music to find out yourself, and it will definitely do you much good in life.

        Reply
        • Mary

          LOL! Facts are something MJ nutjobs flee in fear from! That’s exactly why people should visit mjfacts.com, to get documented, unbiased criminal facts against mj.

          Glad you brought up mj’s “music”.
          As for music, all MJ ever did was STEAL from other better musicians. He wrote basically NONE of his own music, and promoted pedophilia in videos with his pervy boy obsessions.
          Furthermore he STOLE all his dance, ideas, videos from other, true artists. Look up Bob Fosse, Elvis, Cooley Jaxson to name a few. You’ll see exactly where MJ STOLE everything from, all his ideas from! He was nothing but a complete SHAM and FAKE, as real as his ugly, plastic face. King of Pop?! More like KING OF FAKE! AND HE SANG LIKE MICKEY MOUSE.
          One day all these artists will SUE him, and get the credits and everything else do them!

          Reply
          • Mary

            These are the FACTS on mj, albeit unpleasant, TRUTH hurts lol

          • Read Michael

            There is a good reason why if you search “King of Pop” on Google Images, it is all about Michael, and if you search “King of Music”, it is still about Michael. Michael can stand on the shoulders of the giants before him, and take music to its new heights with his creativity and originality. Do more reading on Michael’s music and his life story with head and brain, and with heart and soul. It won’t take long for you to realise the most beautiful and most blessed thing in the world 🙂

          • BP

            FACTS?
            HERE ARE THE REAL FACTS:
            michaeljacksonvindication2.wordpress.com
            ALL DEBUNKED BY THIS: vindicatemj.wordpress.com

          • Harlene

            You are Really Funny! I seem to remember people in the 50’s banning Elvis for his “Vulgar” hip gyrations and women tossed their underware at him and he kept them even in the 70’s! The TV stations only showed him from the Waist Up when he was on Ed Sullivan because they thought he was such a Bad influence at the time! He never wrote any songs, but he did not mind singing other black artist songs like Little Richard and imitating Otis Reading. It wasn’t required back then to give credit to the writer. Don’t forget that Lisa Marie was only 14 when she moved into Graceland to live with Elvis her parents were in Germany, but that was OK back then! He was White! Elvis settled a number of paternity suits, as did the Beatles, who knows how old the girls or women were! MJ gave credit on his albums to others who wrote the song and he never said he created all those moves, he changed them and added his style. Fred Astaire seemed to think he was a great dancer and told him so. MJ wrote many songs that became hits. Regardless of your opinion which you have a right to, the people that give the awards must have thought differently! You might write a complaint to the Grammy’s or the Song Writers Hall of Fame and the Dance Hall of Fame and be sure to provide your valid Evidence and see what happens. I choose not to stoop to name calling, it accomplishes nothing. BTW Just yesterday in Lexington Kentucy the city held it’s yearly public Thirller Dance for families, there was a huge crowd!

          • Harlene

            Mary: Please tell that to the Dance Hall of Fame, the Songwritters Hall of Fame and the Grammy’s, American Music Awards, World Music Awards Guinesses Book of World Records etc, etc. In case you didn’t know there are books about Michael written for school children by educational publishers about his accomplishments and amazing things he has done to make this a better place. Then read my other comment about Elvis and Michael regarding your Fact comment which I failed to address to you.

          • Harlene

            I meant Priscilla was only 14 when she moved in with Elvis not Lisa Marie. sorry for the error.

          • Harlene

            Mary, You are Really Funny! I seem to remember people in the 50’s banning Elvis for his “Vulgar” hip gyrations and women tossed their underware at him and he kept them even in the 70’s! The TV stations only showed him from the Waist Up when he was on Ed Sullivan because they thought he was such a Bad influence at the time! He never wrote any songs, but he did not mind singing other black artist songs like Little Richard and imitating Otis Reading. It wasn’t required back then to give credit to the writer. Don’t forget that Priscilla was only 14 when she moved into Graceland to live with Elvis and her parents were in Germany, but that was OK back then! He was White! Elvis settled a number of paternity suits, as did the Beatles, who knows how old the girls or women were! MJ gave credit on his albums to others who wrote the song and he never said he created all those moves, he changed them and added his style. Fred Astaire seemed to think he was a great dancer and told him so. MJ wrote many songs that became hits. Regardless of your opinion which you have a right to, the people that give the awards must have thought differently! You might write a complaint to the Grammy’s or the Song Writers Hall of Fame and the Dance Hall of Fame and be sure to provide your valid Evidence and see what happens. I choose not to stoop to name calling, it accomplishes nothing. BTW Just yesterday in Lexington Kentucy the city held it’s yearly public Thirller Dance for families, there was a huge crowd!

      • Harlene

        MJFACT’s should be called MJLIES, it is nothing but old tabloid aritcles that have been clearly debunked in the past. There is nothing factual about the information on that site.

        Reply
        • Lawl

          Fun fact: MJFacts was originally called Wacko Facts. They changed the name to seem more neutral. Lmao.

          Reply
    • BP

      You are so desperate Mary – Sarah – Kate… or whoever you are (Desiree, LEN… is that you?)
      Do NOT try it, do not spam the discussion.
      You are so laughable… twisting all the real court facts and trying to infect the facts with tabloid bs.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Reply
  14. Mary

    You guys should strongly consider not allowing mj nutjobs to comment on these type articles. All they do is spread old lies and false slander against mj’s victims. And interfere with fair reporting of the news on mj. Media shouldn’t give MJ’s case any special treatment, they should report the news on him like for anyone else.
    MJ nutjobs are pissing in their pants because the evidence is mounting against MJ publicly, so just like MJ, they want it ‘SILENCED’, lol. But we all know, If MJ were so ‘innocent’, they’d have nothing to HIDE or fear from these articles.

    They have no right to restrict free press. Maybe just disable comments on these articles all together for future.

    Reply
    • BP

      You are so desperate Mary – Sarah – Kate… or whoever you are (Chantal, LEN… is that you?)
      Do NOT try it, do not spam the discussion.

      Reply
    • Harlene

      Based on the outcome of the 2005 trial and the research concerning Chandler case and statement made in court in 2005 it does not appear many people there ever were any victims. Not everyone who beleive MJ was not guilty is a fan by the way. The Arvizos were proven in court to be liars, Jason Francia admitted MJ only tickled him and not near his private area. Both Arivzo boys admitted MJ did not molest them under cross examination. The Mom had a history of coaching her sons to lie for her to sue businesses that is documented. The Grand Jury determined there was NO evidence against MJ in the Chandler case. This is all documented. It has been reported more than once that Tom Sneddon had a Vendetta against MJ. If MJ had been poor these attorney’s would not be trying to sue him at all.

      Reply
      • Kate

        The arvisos never admitted that MJ didn’t molest them. That is untrue. Time to read the court transcripts if you’re going to argue for Michaels defence. Jason never ever said that Michael didn’t molest him, again, read thee transcripts.

        Reply
        • Harlene

          Kate: Whether you like it or not in 2005 Michael Jackson was found NOT GUILTY on ALL charges filed against him by Tom Sneddon and Zonen. I have read the trial transcripts, and the FBI reports, and multple sources written by respectied Non Biased journalist and even some by journalist accused of being biased against MJ. Jason said all MJ did was tickle him, which I stated earlier. The Ariovo’s changed their story under oath. Every non biased author/jounalist who has researched the 2005 and 93 case has concluded there was NO case and not because of Wades testimoney for MJ. One should also consider the history of Tom Sneddon who filed the charges on MJ. Here is some information about Sneddon by a journalist who covered the 2005 Trial. http://www.teammichaeljackson.com/archives/5890

          Reply
  15. BP

    There are a few pages about a complete coverage of the fictitious victims and their LIES:
    HERE ARE THE REAL FACTS:
    michaeljacksonvindication2.wordpress.com
    ALL DEBUNKED BY THIS: vindicatemj.wordpress.com
    THE LATEST BS CASE: dailymichael.com/lawsuits/robson-v-estate

    Reply
    • Lawl

      Do not waste your time with these MJ extremists. They call MJ fans “insane” and “delusional”, yet they make it their lifelong ambition to form ten paragraph replies of raging nonsense to challenge every single comment supporting MJ and go to the ends of the earth and beyond to spread the most obvious and debunked lies about Jackson. I can understand having “suspicions” about his relationship with children–though there is no evidence that it was sinister, but Michael Jackson being racist and hating the black race is a claim so preposterous these people base it only on the mere concept that his skin turned white, which is documented to have been beyond his control. This is a flawed mentality I noticed from nearly every MJ criticizer. They jump to conclusions based on simple suggestions that can be interpreted in any number of ways. Jackson stated multiple times that he was a proud black american, and showed it when he fought for black artist rights against SONY. He was sickened at the concept of a white boy playing him as a child in a movie. He was so distraught at his skin whitening that he tried desperately to even it out with dark make up, and failed. And if memory serves right, he even went so far as to defile a statue of Elvis to make the point that his talent came from blacks or something along those lines. Jackson didn’t hate his race, he was damn prideful of it. In a private conversation with Rabbi Shmuley, which crushes a number of misconceptions people like to spew about Jackson, he specifically states the color of your skin doesn’t determine your character. So you know, these people are either incredibly biased, have done no research, or are mentally handicapped. Sorry, but from what I’m seeing, the real “nutjobs” are the MJ “haters”.

      Reply
      • Read Michael

        If you really want to build the real truth about Michael, you really have to do a lot of serious reading about Michael. Michael’s music is not for the dummy. It is for smart people who can critically read and understand his music and his life story. Michael weaves his soul and his life story into his music, carrying a message that connects material and divine, human and spirit. This is exactly where the power of Michael’s music lies. And this is exactly why Michaels’ fans are a rare species as they know they can grab tight this most valuable human contribution, to enjoy Michael’s inspirational spirit, and make wise changes in life. If you can understand why this is happening, you may have made a good first step toward building your ‘facts’ about Michael.

        Reply
      • Kate

        I think you might be talking about MJ fans here. ‘Helena’ I’m talking bout you.

        Reply
        • A

          Sorry Kate, but you stupid (yes stupid) comments don’t fly. For one on this board it is Harlene not Helena and two neither one of them used name calling, inflammatory language nor smut mongering to make their case regarding MJ. Just theplain, hard facts and concrete detail.

          And while you’re at it regarding “MJ fanatics” (every celebrity has good and bad fans, MJ is no different) why don’t you tell ys about Brett Barnes and the harrassment he’s been getting, huh? Or Macauley Culkin? Just this ridiculous picture alone used by this silly magazine of MJ, what is that? Is that not suggestion planting and mocking, which in turn translates to bully behavior? We know how you people use these tactics and have been regarding MJ way back since the 1970s (when he was still a teenager mind you) and you should be ashamed of yourselves. Keep in mind, time doesn’t stay with just one forever. The truth always comes out and the hit will be so hard it will send liars reeling all around the world.

          Reply
  16. Nicky Knight

    This type of story and reporting is not what DMN is all about..
    DMN isn’t a tabloid website and publishing this type of story takes it into a tabloid
    territory.

    Can we please get back to DMN being about the modern recorded music business..

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      I agree. I used to value Digital Music News highly. This article makes me re-consider its value and status.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Verify Your Humanity *