Manager Tries to Raise Songwriter Royalties, Gets Sued by 10,000 Radio Stations

Irving Azoff

Artist manager Irving Azoff, appearing in June, 2016 on CBS.

Irving Azoff thinks that songwriters are getting forced to accept sub-standard royalties from radio stations.  Now, he’s getting sued by 10,000 of them.

Do we still need the government to determine what songwriters get paid from radio spins?  Radio stations love the cheaper rates, but major publishers and songwriters say the system is rigged for no reason.  So why not privately negotiate something that both sides like, instead of relying on a Soviet-style government agency?

Enter Irving Azoff, the music industry’s most powerful manager.  Irving was so pissed off about this, he started an entirely new company to get around government-mandated rates for radio.  Currently, age-old performance rights organizations (or PROs) ASCAP and BMI are forced to accept government-mandated rates, based on a 1940s-era consent decree designed to limit monopolistic power.

But Irving’s company, Global Music Rights (GMR), isn’t subject to those regulations and is privately negotiating its rates.  The reason is that it’s new and for-profit, but please don’t try to make any more sense of it.  Either way, mega-stars like Pharrell and Ryan Tedder have joined GMR to negotiate higher payouts.

Actually, a lot of artists are doing the same thing, which means that radio stations will soon faced major increases in their publishing performance payouts.  Which might explain why a group of 10,000 radio stations are now suing Azoff to try to shut him down.  They’re calling GMR a monopoly, and calling the game unfair.

You know how this one goes: when you can’t negotiate, litigate.

The litigation is coming from the RMLC (Radio Music Licensing Committee), a group that claims that GMR can gouge them with unfair rates.  RMLC doesn’t want private negotiations, which includes the possibility of not licensing certain works or paying more than their ‘budget’.

Instead, they’re arguing that GMC should be forced to charge government-set rates, just like ASCAP and BMI, because of monopolistic abuse.

Sounds like a lawsuit against free market capitalism, and private dealmaking.  But for the RMLC, the move has already worked with SESAC.  Like GMR, SESAC is also privately run and free from government-set rates.  But back in the summer of 2015, SESAC agreed to a settlement with RMLC.

Whether Azoff succumbs to the same legal bullying remains to be seen, though we have a feeling that the RMLC is in for a huge fight.

The RMLC filed that action against GMR with the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

 

 

4 Responses

  1. Remi Swierczek

    Radio (100,000 stations globally), approximatelly 3 to 4 million public spots and 7 stupefied streamers like Apple, Spotify or Pandora should be converted at once to $200B Discovery Moment Monetization music store!
    Plenty of cash for musicians, Mr Azoff and labels on UMG invented streaming suicide course.

    The only roadblock to music dream land: Larry Page with his Google and YouTube. Let’s access him and show him how music can become the biggest moonshot of his life. We can double Google on music by 2020.

    Reply
  2. Esquire

    How could you make reference to free market capitalism when each of these songwriters is a separate business and Azoff is bring them together to set prices, terms and conditions?

    When businesses collude on price and terms, they get charged with anti-trust violations unless there is some exemption for them in the law, an exemption that does not exist in this circumstance.

    Reply
  3. Rick Shaw

    10,000…is that all? No doubt that there is no concern about this by the Poison Dwarf.

    Reply
  4. Kimeyo J Daniels

    Mr. Azoff is one of the Original HitMen so he definitely knows his way around a few loop holes, and most importantly everyone is disappointed on how the deal was made in the beginning to allow digital rights to shift the power of leverage from the copyright owner to those making a profit from exploiting works virally… Since the Government’s primary focus is regulation it allowed more leverage being taken away… Which is why Mr.Azoff is considered brilliant in my eyes he took his clients position as a copyright owner by way of contract of course and controlled the works in all levels of exploitation unless you adjusted the rate… The reason this has become a problem is like most new creative revenue streams it catches wind and more people will want to get on board… The other PRO’s will have to make more competitive decisions in order to maintain their roster of strong contributors… I commend Mr. Azoff for creating a new rate for performers…. I feel he will successful in this matter because the rate is due for an increase right now anyway…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Verify Your Humanity *