Regulatory, Trade Associations
All Categories
03
August
2004
Do We Need Government Intervention?
The recent acquisition of OD2 by Loudeye presents the potential for a wholesale service to provide innovative technology and content in a business model that is prospectively profitable. At center stage, Loudeye's Sonic Selector will be available to all music retailers in Europe. It will allow uses to stream chosen tunes for 1 pence per track. This a la carte option for streaming contrasts with both iTunes/Napster downloads (at 99 cents per track) and Rhapsody services ("all you can eat" streaming for $9.99 per month.)
Many have suggested that government should institute a system to garner revenues from levies on internet service providers or equipment manufacturers, and so compensate rights owners for takings through peer-to-peer. This would presumably allow peer-to-peer to continue unchallenged. Little careful economic analysis has gone into estimating the correct number or perceiving the real consequences.
Among the many shortcomings of government schemes to collect copyright revenues, it is difficult to imagine how government could determine what new technologies (such as Loudeye's or Microsoft's prospective Janus) are presented to retailers. Free market forces provide the incentives for new innovation but necessarily implicate the protection of property rights to preserve those same incentives.
What advocates of free takings might not then understand is that peer-to-peer takings of copyrighted music take market share not only from catalog recordings, but also from competing new technologies that are now shaping the music industry and digital marketplace.
Many have suggested that government should institute a system to garner revenues from levies on internet service providers or equipment manufacturers, and so compensate rights owners for takings through peer-to-peer. This would presumably allow peer-to-peer to continue unchallenged. Little careful economic analysis has gone into estimating the correct number or perceiving the real consequences.
Among the many shortcomings of government schemes to collect copyright revenues, it is difficult to imagine how government could determine what new technologies (such as Loudeye's or Microsoft's prospective Janus) are presented to retailers. Free market forces provide the incentives for new innovation but necessarily implicate the protection of property rights to preserve those same incentives.
What advocates of free takings might not then understand is that peer-to-peer takings of copyrighted music take market share not only from catalog recordings, but also from competing new technologies that are now shaping the music industry and digital marketplace.
- Posted by Michael Einhorn posted at 2004-08-03 14:52
- Permalink
- ¦
- Comment (0)
Comments
17
August
2004
Indecent Proposals
If you think media ownership and indecency to be the far-reaching issues the FCC is currently dealing with, think again....
This is an archived story, and requires registration to view the entire article.
Please login on your left, or click new user to quickly sign-up. Thanks again for researching with us!
- Posted by Rags Gupta, Live365 posted at 2004-08-17 01:12
- Permalink
- ¦
- Comment (0)
11
September
2004
Compulsory Licensing: Bad Moon Rising
A trendy academic proposal that would allow computer users to make unlimited takings of copyrighted content is compulso...
This is an archived story, and requires registration to view the entire article.
Please login on your left, or click new user to quickly sign-up. Thanks again for researching with us!
- Posted by Michael Einhorn posted at 2004-09-11 11:50
- Permalink
- ¦
- Comment (0)
02
December
2004
No More CRAP, er CARP
President Bush signed the Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act into law today. This abolishes the CARP ...
This is an archived story, and requires registration to view the entire article.
Please login on your left, or click new user to quickly sign-up. Thanks again for researching with us!
- Posted by Rags Gupta, Live365 posted at 2004-12-02 23:53
- Permalink
- ¦
- Comment (0)
22
June
2005
MGM - Grokster: The Calm Before the Storm
The SCOTUS decision for MGM-Grokster will soon be handed out. The conventional wisdom holds that the sacred cow ...
This is an archived story, and requires registration to view the entire article.
Please login on your left, or click new user to quickly sign-up. Thanks again for researching with us!
- Posted by Rags Gupta posted at 2005-06-22 20:46
- Permalink
- ¦
- Comment (0)
30
April
2006
The PERFORM Act
Earlier this week, details emerged of the PERFORM Act backed by Senators Feinstein, Frist and Graham that attempts to...
This is an archived story, and requires registration to view the entire article.
Please login on your left, or click new user to quickly sign-up. Thanks again for researching with us!
- Posted by Rags Gupta posted at 2006-04-30 16:56
- Permalink
- ¦
- Comment (0)
29
June
2006
The Net Neutrality Debate
Network Neutrality is a hot-button issue that concerns how the internet itself will be governed in years to come. One o...
This is an archived story, and requires registration to view the entire article.
Please login on your left, or click new user to quickly sign-up. Thanks again for researching with us!
- Posted by Joseph Clark, Analyst posted at 2006-06-29 05:59
- Permalink
- ¦
- Comment (0)
27
April
2007
The Internet Radio Equality Act
That's the name of a bill that was introduced ea...
This is an archived story, and requires registration to view the entire article.
Please login on your left, or click new user to quickly sign-up. Thanks again for researching with us!
- Posted by rgupta posted at 2007-04-27 05:25
- Permalink
- ¦
- Comment (0)
- ¦
- Trackback (0)