Follow Us

·

Warner Music Group Financial Results, 2001-2011...

Thursday, December 08, 2011
by  paul

This morning, Warner Music Group posted net losses of $103 million during the recent quarter, and $205 million on the year.  Unfortunately, that's nothing new for this major.      

  





  • Comments Closed
    Comments (27)

    @stupidchewbacca Thursday, December 08, 2011

     jasonmichaelmacisaac 

    Warner Music Group has lost over $10 billion in 10 years!


    @FMarchandVS Thursday, December 08, 2011

    Francois Marchand

    Wow.


    Maxwellian Thursday, December 08, 2011

    But what does Jeff Price think of this?


    @aKiDnamedHENNY Thursday, December 08, 2011

    Good God...


    Me Thursday, December 08, 2011

    Is this including Warner/Chappell?  Or is it just the label side of things?


    paul Thursday, December 08, 2011

    Yes, it does.  These are consolidated financial statements from the umbrella group, WMG.

    /paul


    Tony Gottlieb Friday, December 09, 2011

    Anyone care to conjecture about how much of that was a result of executive Golden Parachutes?


    @marcdazzo Friday, December 09, 2011

    How is this possible?


    @Charly_SDDD Friday, December 09, 2011

    Ouch, ça fait mal...


    @pickaxebobby Friday, December 09, 2011

    Seriously, how the fuck is this possible?

    Not many companies can weather a net $10b loss over a decade.
    What makes them think they can turn that trend around now? Especially given WMG's backward-thinking dino mentality. The definition of insanity...


    Visitor Friday, December 09, 2011

    Yeah, a company with less than a billion a year in revenue that losses over $10 billion in a decade. Sounds awesome huh?


    Matt Shamus Friday, December 09, 2011

    How do they stay in business? This is a serious question, I'd love to know..


    Me Friday, December 09, 2011

    I don't know.  The label has been sold twice during that period.


    @Kahmil Friday, December 09, 2011

    WOW!!! Yikes!!


    @petterjaam Friday, December 09, 2011

    Really!!!!!


    @ogrover Friday, December 09, 2011

     ogrover 

    Wow. This says it all.


    @MelodyVonRock Friday, December 09, 2011

     Melody von Rock

    does it include intangibles?


    Krumbaland Saturday, December 10, 2011

    They can make the turnaround - if they would sign my Songs :-)


    UberdanSounds Saturday, December 10, 2011

    Ha!  I believe it's a lot less because of the way they cook the bo*** ahem! Calculate, the books.

    http://youtube.com/UberdanSounds


    Visitor Saturday, December 10, 2011

    I wonder what happened in 2006 to help them be in t green that year? Please do tell!


    @snoopdobb Saturday, December 10, 2011

     EsEnDblOhPiDiOhDblB

    I guess this is bad, but I'm smiling!


    @Navigatepartner Saturday, December 10, 2011

     Peggy Dold

    OUCH!


    @MrGobert Saturday, December 10, 2011

    J. Gobert

    How does Warner Music stay in business losing over $10 Billion in the past 10 years? What company can survive that?

     


    @brianleewhite Saturday, December 10, 2011

    I know separating those green M&Ms cost money, but damn.


    Me Sunday, December 11, 2011

    They took in the surplus that year from going public. I left the company not long after. Golden parachutes exist in the music industry and there is a REASON Bronfman is leaving this company:not profitable anymore.


    @SuperstarGuess Sunday, December 11, 2011

     SuperStarGuess

    No money in the music?? Labels r losing big time!

     


    @AngelNavas85 Thursday, December 15, 2011

     Angel Navas

    Miren lo que han perdido! 

     


OUR SPONSORS

Most Read

67

Every Time Netflix Enters a New Market, BitTorrent Traffic Goes Down...

49

Dear Congress: Please Consider These Points for Your Massive Copyright Overhaul...

45

Spotify Says They're Gonna Be So Big, Artists Won't Even Have to Worry About Rent...