Get ready for a messy war, one that involves very big companies and quite possibly, very big artists. On Monday afternoon, MegaUpload filed a lawsuit against Universal Music Group in the US District Court of Northern California (San Jose), alleging abuse of DMCA power. The cyberlocker giant is now claiming that UMG knowingly ordered YouTube to yank its 'MegaUpload Song' without a justified copyright claim, rendering this for viewers on Friday:
UMG has a quick pipeline into YouTube, but it remains unclear exactly what the copyright violation was. "On or about December 9, 2011, Defendants, and/or their representatives, viewed the MEGAUPLOAD SONG VIDEO and decided to issue one or more DMCA takedown notices to YouTube and others despite their knowledge that the use of the MEGAUPLOAD SONG VIDEO did not infringe on any of Defendants’ copyrights," the filing states.
> The complete filing is available here.
In a brief response to Digital Music News, Universal Music Group did not specify the direct violations, but did point to at least one unhappy artist. "This is an ongoing dispute that surfaced several weeks ago with respect to the unauthorized use of a performance from one of our artists," a top executive at the label described. "We heard from a number of our other artists (and their representatives) who told us they've never consented to being portrayed in this video. As a result, at least one of them has already sent a takedown notice for this unauthorized use."
That artist sounds like will.i.am, who plays a very prominent role endorsing MegaUpload throughout the video. But according to a recently-published article in the Hollywood Reporter, will.i.am attorney Ken Hertz claims his client did not authorize the publication of the 'MegaUpload Song,' at least in its current form. The disagreement is complicated by the video itself, which features will.i.am repeatedly stating, "When I want to send files across the globe, I use MegaUpload," while also appearing to sing throughout multiple choruses.
In response, MegaUpload pointed to comprehensive agreements authorizing this use, opening the very real possibility of another, separate lawsuit ahead. In fact, the claim points to a dedicated recording session at Roundhouse Studios in Auckland, New Zealand, 'primarily for the purpose of recording a promotional song and video' and at 'substantial expense to MegaUpload.' That expense included the involvement of Printz Board, who is closely associated with the Black Eyed Peas and also has an agreement with UMG-owned Universal Music Publishing Group.
The question is what other artists have an issue with this spot, and whether MegaUpload neglected to properly secure their consent despite the recording session and explicit endorsements. Also entangled in this mess is Russell Simmons, Kanye West, Diddy, Game, and Alicia Keys, all of whom are also featured prominently in the song. The complete list of musicians and artists involved in this video, according to the lawsuit, are:
1. Kasseem Dean (Swizz Beatz)
2. Kanye West
3. Mary J. Blige
4. Estelle Swaray
5. Ciara Harris
6. Jayceon Taylor (Game)
7. Carmelo Anthony
8. Will Adams (will.i.am)
9. Kim Kardashian
10. Sean Combs (Diddy)
11. Alicia Keys
12. Chris Brown
13. Floyd Mayweather
14. Jamie Foxx
15. Jonathan Smith (Lil Jon)
16. Brett Ratner
17. Serena Williams
18. Russell Simmons
@DuncJMH Monday, December 12, 2011
Duncan J M Hearn
Interesting (strokes chin)
@lilmikesf Monday, December 12, 2011
Next Monday, December 12, 2011
When's Yousendit gonna hop on the train??
hopefully not? Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Actually, YouSendit works with many indie labels around the world to deliver promotional material to DJs e.t.c.
I don't think they would even consider to hurt their profile with a MegaUpload-style bullshit campaign.
Letitia DeHoney Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Buck Tuesday, December 13, 2011
The link appears to be broken for the complete filing
paul Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Sorry to make you the QA guy. Check it now.
@fmomboisse Tuesday, December 13, 2011
HADOPI de plus en plus fort, c'est megaupload qui attaque en justise Universal!
Maxwellian Tuesday, December 13, 2011
The situation seems obvious: Will I Am and others get a truck load of cash for doing this, then realized they fucked up. Sorry guys, deal's a deal and M-U lawyers know what they're doing I doubt those contracts don't cover this.
Better be really careful guys: claiming DMCA takedown without rights is PERJURY not just "abuse". It's EXACTLY what this SOPA bullshit is all about. Might want to walk away from this one Hertz.
Visitor Tuesday, December 13, 2011
SOPA is about perjury not abuse? You aren't making sense...
These artists should be ashamed for taking Megauploads dirty money. Selling out just hit a new all-time low.
Shane T Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Last time I checked, DMCA's can be sent if the copyright holder, or their agent has a "good faith belief" that it's their material. Seems a little FAR from "Purgery"...
That being said, it's going to be interesting to see what actually happened here once all the paper shakes loose.
money for nothing Tuesday, December 13, 2011
Martin Luther King and Malcom X would be furious with these stupid excuses of "entertainers".
Black people making confindential deals with a neonazi businessman?! WTF?!?
What's next, Alicia Keys? Are you going to sing to a KKK leader's birthday party if the price is right?
Amy Thursday, December 15, 2011
If it was Will.I.Am who is kicking up a stink, that would be hilarious considering how many artists he's sampled without getting permission to use the samples beforehand...