The Paper Lions have a problem: they can't get paid by their label on their latest album, Trophies. The solution? Release the album for free, and tell your fans all about it. "We have yet to see a paycheck for a single record sold by them," the band told fans. "If you bought our record on Amazon or iTunes, or even at a record store, we didn’t get that money. We don't know why. We don't know if it's being held somewhere, or if it's been spent."
The band told Digital Music News that this is definitely not an unrecouped situation. "The record deal was straight up distribution with a split on all revenues," a member told us. "We fronted all the money for expenses, so there was nothing for the label to recoup."

But what label, exactly? The band didn't disclose, but we tracked this down to MB3 Records, an indie label with worldwide distribution via EMI Distribution and a division of The MuseBox, Inc. Which is where this got pretty strange, because the president of the MuseBox said they'd had no contact with the band, and there was almost no money ('$100 in the pipeline') for them. "WOW, very interesting," Musebox CEO Nadine Gelineau emailed Digital Music News after we informed her of the development. "They completely fell off the radar. I personally sent their manager about 20 emails and left 10 voicemails and never ever got a return call or email from him or the band. My Canadian staff said the same."
The deeper we dig into this, the messier it gets. Even more baffling is that Trophies seems to be yanked from iTunes, and only available as an import on Amazon. Which sounds like another record label relationship gone horribly wrong (for all sides), and yet another chapter in a long, depressing dossier.
This is what the group (formerly the Chucky Danger Band) recently messaged to its fans while pushing the nuclear button.
Some of you may have noticed that we’ve started doing something that, for us, is a little different. Today, we’d like to tell you why.
In August of 2009, we raised the money to rent a studio, hire a producer, and record Trophies. A few months later, we were approached by a record label that wanted to release Trophies on our behalf. After a period of negotiation, we signed a deal with that company. They released the record in September of 2010, and everything was dandy.
Fast forward to the present: we have yet to see a paycheque for a single record sold by them. If you bought our record on Amazon or iTunes, or even at a record store, we didn’t get that money. We don’t know why. We don’t know if it’s being held somewhere, or if it’s been spent.
We asked ourselves, what do we do now? Hire a lawyer? That would cost a lot of money and take a lot of time. Ultimately, we just want people to hear the music. And in reality, this experience has given us an excuse to do something we’ve wanted to do for a long time.
So we’ve decided to give Trophies away in exchange for your email address. And we feel pretty good about it.
Follow the link, click on “Free Download”, enter your email, and Trophies (with Traveling as a bonus track) is yours for the taking.
Thanks everybody.
PS. We will only use your email addresses to occasionally update you with news about the band. We will never give your email addresses to anyone else.
PPS. If you ever bought Trophies directly from a band member (at a show, from the back of the van, etc.) we did get that money. It was used for gas.
PSPS. People have been offering to donate money. That is very generous. Any money that we take in from this donate button will go directly towards funding our next record.

Comments Closed
Visitor2 Friday, February 24, 2012
TL;DR

joe Friday, February 24, 2012

Tim Cushing Friday, February 24, 2012
I think the label in question is EMI.
A profile lists EMI Canada as the label releasing "Trophies":
http://tuesdayguide.com/2010/09/28/paper-lions-trophies/
And CD Universe lists EMI as the label for the "Trophies" CD:
http://www.cduniverse.com/productinfo.asp?pid=8287562

@frascognamusic Friday, February 24, 2012
Blame the band they never hired a lawyer.

@copperworks_ Friday, February 24, 2012
Very interesting! A story to watch as it develops...

@SOCANRodney Friday, February 24, 2012
Good on ya boys!

@rightsworkshop Friday, February 24, 2012
Another one-finger salute to the labels.

@msoyoola Friday, February 24, 2012
The way forward
#makemoves

Strange Friday Friday, February 24, 2012
EMI isn't to blame. Look into MB3 Records & The Musebox Distribution, a division of The Musebox Inc.
http://themusebox.net/distribution/

Dalt Wisney Friday, February 24, 2012
Not sure what's dumber a shitting asshole or these gents.

Steven Corn (BFM Digital) Friday, February 24, 2012
Something is missing here. Who paid for the manufacturing of the CD that's available as an import? Did the distributor do any co-ops or advertising? Most distributors have a hold back for returns as well as a distribution fee. Or, it could be as simple as the fact that maybe the album earned less than $100 in sales (a typical threshold for issuing payments).
The point is that who knows what's happening. THere's obviously some money somewhere. But if the band never even got a royalty statement, it's their responsibility to demand one. Then it's their further responsibility to question it if they don't think it's right. So did that happen??
I send out 550 statements a quarter. If one gets missent or an email gets lost, I always hear about it within a week or two.
I think that this situation is a mutual blame game without anyone accepting responsibility.

Zoe Keating Friday, February 24, 2012
Anyone have a Neilsen account to see what they've sold?

Elud Monday, February 27, 2012

Kool Kool Saturday, February 25, 2012
More stupid bullshit from people who had their brains lobotomized by Facebook.
Sure, go ahead and give your album for free, then try to sell the next one to your mailing list. It is not like you are able to learn from other peoples' experiments...! It takes some minimum brain activity to be able to do that.
Hey, one more band fucking things up and commiting business suicide, more space for those who get it. Harsh? Sure. But it's reality.

Visitor Tuesday, February 28, 2012
i think your reference to "get[ting] it" is the entirety of this conversation. and if you know what "it" is in terms making this business make money again, friggin come out with "it."

Andy Saturday, February 25, 2012
96 listeners on last.fm, they must have sold a ton of records!

Noise Saturday, February 25, 2012
I don't think that band has sold the numbers they claim they did. But the Last.fm stats are as useful as Alexa. Basically, crap. I produced an album that has sold ~65,000 so far. There are less than 10 people who have it on their Last.fm data right now.

zbeat Monday, February 27, 2012
I call BULLSHIT. That discrepancy would be quite difficult to achieve, short of a major meta-data problem. Care to share the artist, so this can be verified? I'd be happy to eat crow if this is true.
Sure, you could probably argue that certain genres (and regions) are under-represented on Last.FM, as the user-base probably skews hip and tech-savvy. But this wouldn't apply to the pop/indie-rock of Paper Lions (http://www.last.fm/music/Paper+Lions/).

explanation Monday, February 27, 2012
Last.fm shows only highly pirated albums. The rest is not there. Simple as that.

Novi Novak Friday, March 02, 2012
Who even pays attention to Last.fm numbers..... I have sold thousands upon thousands of copies of my singles and probably have less listens than that on last.fm. What a stupid comment on top of a smart ass one making you look even more simple minded.

Borris The Z Saturday, February 25, 2012
I hope these morons earn a couple of dollars from the donations, in order to afford a cheap in ear system, with an audio loop that says "breath in....breath out....breath in....breath out..."

hahaha Saturday, February 25, 2012
They can't even get their official website on No.1 for their band name!

effin Saturday, February 25, 2012
yawn

Clyde Smith Sunday, February 26, 2012
When it's the band speaking, is that really the manager or somebody in the band?
It would be kind of funny if this turned out to be the manager's fault!

@mediajorge Sunday, February 26, 2012
Who's zoomin who...

@thinklikealabel Sunday, February 26, 2012
Amazing article. Must read.

@ARudolph175 Sunday, February 26, 2012
WOW, very interesting...

@wampusmm Sunday, February 26, 2012
First thought I had when I read this was "are they any good?" "Stay Here for a While" & others make a case.

Anon. Monday, February 27, 2012

Jeff Robinson Monday, February 27, 2012
Likely, both sides saying exactly the same thing. No shenanigans- EXTREMELY probable.
A band that is not touring or playing weekly club dates stands to sell $15 per quarter from miscellaneous online music discovery through either self-or-larger distribution. My label has 5 such acts and that is about what they sell- many months, less than that figure.
People need to learn that the internet is NOT a promotional end. Meeting strangers face-to-face is still the best way to earn $$ in the music business whether through shows or selling recordings at shows.
Both MB3 and the Paper Lions are to blame for being ignorant, but in this case, both should live and learn. Both now know more about the music industry and that's a priceless education.

111 Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Dear MB3 Records, a short open message from someone who likes your products: please hire a SEO professional to work on your website's relationship with the search engines. Please.

Industry Aficionado Thursday, March 01, 2012
I think many of the commenters are WAY too focused on how many units the band moved. If it's true the band didn't sell very much, you should be asking "why?". When a band signs with a label, it goes without saying the label is supposed to provide press opportunities and retail support.
Seriously, look-up MB3 Records' "Distribution and Sales Services": http://themusebox.net/services/
If you google online, you'll find very few press hits from when "Trophies" had been released initially. Why is this? Why wasn't MB3 working harder to push their artist to the forefront of the Canadian music scene? Wouldn't they want the band to sell as many copies as possible? How could the relationship between the label & artist disintegrate so easily?
At the end of the day, everybody plays the fool sometimes. Maybe the Paper Lions should've done a little more research before signing with MB3. But a company SHOULD deliver the services it promises its customers -- and MB3 demonstrates an inability to do anything of the sort.
There's more to this story - I guarantee it. I would encourage everyone to look into the history of MB3/The Musebox. That company all by itself is a fascinating case study.

OUR SPONSORS
Follow Us