Follow Us

·

Spotify's CEO Has an Estimated Net Worth of $310 Million...

Sunday, April 29, 2012
by  paul

Seriously? The net worth estimate was calculated by the London-based Sunday Times, which now ranks Spotify CEO Daniel Ek as the 10th richest music industry person in Britain (Ek is now based in London).  The personal worth of 190 million pounds, or $310 million at current exchange rates, puts Ek on par with Mick Jagger.            

 

  

Here's the Times ranking.

1. Clive Calder 

Estimated net worth: £1.35 billion

 

2. Sir Cameron Mackintosh 

£725 million

 

3. Sir Paul McCartney 

£665 million

 

4. Lord Lloyd Webber

£590 million

 

5. U2 

£519 million (combined)

 

6. Simon Fuller

£375 million 

 

7. Simon Cowell 

£225 million

 

8. Sir Elton John 

£220 million

 

9. Michael Flatley 

£192 million 

 

10. (tied) David and Victoria Beckham

£190 million

 

Sir Mick Jagger

£190 million

 

Daniel Ek

£190 million

 

A few problems immediately stand out with the calculation.  Ek's valuation is largely paper-based and mostly illiquid: Spotify may be worth nearly $2 billion (or far more) based on investor valuations, but Ek simply cannot access a large percentage of this capital.  That is, unless a monster acquisition or IPO takes place (a huge 'if' right now.)  

Then, there's the nagging issue of a money-bleeding business model, though insiders are increasingly pointing Digital Music News to a billion-dollar shell game.  And in this game, profits don't necessarily matter: Spotify has the ridiculous scale of Facebook and Coca-Cola; it has investors willing to gamble with hundreds of millions; it has the possibility of going public on Wall Street or even getting acquired at an Instagram-style multiple.

Sounds like a great game if you're a Spotify investor, Spotify executive like Ek, or major label payee.  But artists seem to be getting completely left out of this 'game,' thanks to laughable payouts and endless pressure to participate in the 'future'.  The question is whether enough will play along.  "Spotify would be/have nothing if not for the artists who create the music!" one artist emailed us morning.

 





  • Comments Closed
    Comments (37)

    Bald Headed John Sunday, April 29, 2012

    That's a lot of dome wax and I should know


    @Fight! Sunday, April 29, 2012

    Look how successful! At only 26! Not broke like some loser musician...

    #spotify #greed


    Anonymous Monday, April 30, 2012

    So why do you keep using it for free loser? Go away.


    Visitor Sunday, April 29, 2012

    http://entrepid.sg/spotifys-revenue-model/

    thought you guys'd be interested in this too..


    FarePlay Monday, April 30, 2012

    Well, well the defenders of Mr. Ek.  Between Ek's connection with former Napster founders, who started this whole mess along with a 12 year slide in revenue for artist.  

    Spotify's nearly 20% equity stake from the record labels as part of their licensing "negotiations".

    His deals with AT&T, McDonalds and other MAJOR corporations to enable them to stream music FOR FREE.  Well wait, that's not entirely true.  While the musicians will lose out on lucrative licensing fees, Spotify will gain loads of new subscribers and probably a couple of bucks.  AT&T, McDonalds, etc.? Now they can save on all those bothersome licensing fees. 

    You have to admire his brilliance, even if it comes off the backs of others hard work.  And we thought only Wall Street was that evil.

    So Mr. Ek, next time you walk by a street musician, drop in a couple bucks in that beaten up, well worn guitar case; does that sound fair?

    So you can join us at https://www.fareplay.org

    Learn more here:  http://thetrichordist.wordpress.com/2012/04/23/musicians-pov-give-it-to-mikey-hell-eat-anything-spotify-is-good-for-you-yum-yum-part-1-of-5/

    Or prattle on about his success.


    Visitor Monday, April 30, 2012

    Or we can just choose not to listen to you. Spotify is AMAZING and is the FUTURE....


    FarePlay Tuesday, May 01, 2012

    Spotify does present an empowering opportunity for the artist, especially the independent artists, who have the right to pull their music from Spotify.

    And unlike underregulated file sharing sites, Spotify does have to comply with take down notices without the benefit of reposting the content immediately afterward.

    As cloud computing mushrooms and creates new challenges, this is a legitimate opportunity for artists to participate in setting the price for sustainable compensation.

    And for those artists who want to give it away, now you will have less competition.

    Will Buckley, founder, FarePlay

     

     


    LeeM Monday, April 30, 2012

    I have a B2B background music business and 'free' is pretty tough to compete with. Services like Spotify and the labels themselves have devalued music, depriving artists and (music) businesses alike. 

    I don’t see it as “big label” or “huge start up”, it's a club for the megalomaniacs; where salaries and personal wealth take precedence over profitable performance. I doubt that the megalomaniac is concerned about longevity of a business; it’s about what’s in it for them in this lifetime. 

     

     


    @YourAnonNews Sunday, April 29, 2012

    How is this fair??!


    WILL Monday, April 30, 2012

     

    ..because he had the vision to create this business. You could have too. That's what seperates young successful tech CEO's from the rest..they have the balls to get off their arse and take it on. It's not easy founding a startup - lots of hurdles and setbacks that people like Elk find a way to battle through. He merits it. 


    Yup Monday, April 30, 2012

    Exactly. 

    The funny thing is, Ek was a multi millionaire YEARS before Spotify was even a twinkle in his eye. This guy was working his ass off as a programmer in his teens from a shitty part of Sweden then managed to navigate his way through the tech world to where he is now. 

    PS, no one ever said business, let a lone the music business was fair. 

     


    TheFuturist Monday, April 30, 2012

    Right on! Nothing but cry babies on here. They are all living in the past like the record companies did for so many years and look at where they are now.


    Central Scrutinizer Monday, April 30, 2012

    Always appreciate the petit bourgeois rationalization of how one hard working individual is rich and the other equally hard working individual is forced to become a wage slave because of circumstance.


    John L Monday, April 30, 2012

    A working class hero is something to be


    Visitor Monday, April 30, 2012

    Love me some John Lennon!


    @forcemm Monday, April 30, 2012

    Artists are making pennies from Spotify but their CEO has a net worth of $310 million!


    Anhero Monday, April 30, 2012

    At least they're making something.


    FarePlay Monday, April 30, 2012

    Aw yes.  Let the peasants eat cake.  How.......revolutionary


    Anonymous Monday, April 30, 2012

    Shup the hell up! It's much better than people downloading their music for free on torrents.


    musicservices4less Monday, April 30, 2012

    Ahhh, the digital technocrats come out to play!


    Visitor Monday, April 30, 2012

    Hell of a lot better then being a digital techpublican!


    some other visitor Tuesday, May 01, 2012

    This is why I am a techertarian!


    visitor Tuesday, May 01, 2012

    Ek was the CEO of uTorrent at one point.  you do know that right?


    musicservices4less Monday, April 30, 2012

    Is Ek really in the music business or in the record distribution business?  Elton John, Mick Jagger, Clive Calder, etc. are but Ek and a few other names?  It's like saying that Steve Jobs was in the music business because of iTunes.  I'm sorry, did I miss where Ek signed a recording artist?  Did he ever try to promote a record and get it noticed (other than on Spotify)?  Let's be real.  He and those like him are in technology and do not give two **its about music - only making money from music and those who create it.


    Visitor Monday, April 30, 2012

    Go back to your illegal torrents cry baby.


    @forfolkssake Monday, April 30, 2012

    Woah!


    @brookeslist Monday, April 30, 2012

    Spotify's CEO is worth this much? What about artists? The company wouldn't be a company if it wasn't for the music!


    Anonymous Monday, April 30, 2012

    True. But where are the artists without Spotify? Spotify is the future whether you like it or not. #DealWithIt


    @mrjimbob Monday, April 30, 2012

    Spotify's CEO Has an Estimated Net Worth of $310 Million

    Or 88 bazillion bazillion bazillion plays of Sheriff Fatman.


    @mikesplain Monday, April 30, 2012

    Spotify's CEO has a net worth of $310 Million because of a simple music platform. Proves what quality execution can do.


    Visitor Monday, April 30, 2012

    Bravo! Wells said.


    Visitor Monday, April 30, 2012

    MOG is so much better than Spotify. Best audio quality out there outside of an actual CD. Even better than iTunes.


    What? Monday, April 30, 2012

    Lots of trolls on this thread


    Visitor Tuesday, May 01, 2012

    I must kindly disagree with you. I think they are the common man just keeping it real.


    Anonymous Tuesday, May 01, 2012

    Trolls? I see no trolls, whatcha talking about, man? I only see you.


    Gwendoline Zilchify Thursday, May 03, 2012

    Tough call ... actually selling your musical creations and making money or giving them away for $0.0004137 a play.

    There are some wankers of the highest order making comments here without realising some simple truths:

    1. Musicians make music and can actually decide where it goes.

    2. If independent musical careers become unsustainable, all that will be left is music produced by televisions shows such as 'Idol' and the like. If thats where your musical taste lies, then fine, suck on Satan's c*ck (to quote Bill Hicks) and chug that product down.

    3. Real music made by real artists who resist the system, stand strong and dont bend over for the latest fad business model, will live (and create) on - they always have. Spotify and all organisations who do their best to screw the artist instead of sustaining them, will eventually burst like just another dot com bubble. 

    The future? nah ... It cant survive without people who CREATE things of depth ... you know ... MUSIC


     


    Visitor Thursday, May 03, 2012

    Oh, I bow down to you Englishman; you know all. Not. Just your opinion. That is all. Cheerio.


OUR SPONSORS

Most Read

44

The VinylRecorder T560: It Lets You Make Your Own Vinyl, at Home...

49

Dear Congress: Please Consider These Points for Your Massive Copyright Overhaul...

45

Let's Add 'Burnout' to the List of Artist Problems...