Follow Us

·

Warner Music Group Financial Results, 2002-2012...

Wednesday, December 19, 2012
by  paul

Don't worry: Billboard says the major labels are doing just fine.  But how long can this possibly last?  

 

Warner Music Group

financial profits/losses, fiscal years 2002-2012 (as reported to the SEC).

 

2012: ―$190 million.


2011: ―$206 million.


2010: ―$143 million.


2009: ―$100 million.


2008: ―$56 million.


2007: ―$21 million.


2006: +$60 million.


2005: ―$169 million


2004: ―$1.422 billion.


2003: ―$1.353 billion.


2002: ―$6.026 billion.

 

Total: $9.626 billion





  • Comments Closed
    Comments (20)

    Yo Wednesday, December 19, 2012

    Thanks, again, Digital Music News


    BigFM Wednesday, December 19, 2012

    This reaffirms my thinking that the future is a licensing farm with much lower (and fairer) rates for start-ups.  So after this crashes, guess who gets a much better deal? Spotify,Apple, Deezer and pretty much anyone else.


    Visitor Wednesday, December 19, 2012

    Why was 2002 so bad?


    Visitor Thursday, December 20, 2012

    And what happened in 2006?


    Matt Thursday, December 20, 2012

    Good question...


    The majority of the loss is 2002.  All I can think of is some sort of major operating loss.  Such as, pressing a crapload of CDs that weren't ultimately purchased.


    Casey Thursday, December 20, 2012

    Were there any mergers in 2002?


    Napster Thursday, December 20, 2012

    Repercussions from digital piracy.


    lifer Thursday, December 20, 2012

    Blame it on Delores Tucker?


    uttng Thursday, December 20, 2012

    so are the major labels crumbling at their core or not ? yes...


    V Thursday, December 20, 2012

    I'm assuming 2003 and 2004 should be in Billions


    Visitor Thursday, December 20, 2012

    I also think some of the figures are misprints. can't verify until I see trhe sec data myself


    paul Thursday, December 20, 2012

    Yes, thank you.

    If you're tracking in the SEC documents, look for net losses/gains.

    losses are in (), gains are not.

    /paul


    @RapRehab Thursday, December 20, 2012

    Because the music sucks...


    irving rapino Thursday, December 20, 2012

    Do the same for Live Nation. It's just as bad.


    SwedishMusic Thursday, December 20, 2012

    What does this have to do with the state of the music business? You have to look at other companies as well. Also, where are the numbers prior to 2002? That would be of interest too... This is a lousy "article" that means absolutely nothing at all.


    Napster Thursday, December 20, 2012

    When you're losing that kind of money, it means a lot to someone.


    BronxMusic Thursday, December 20, 2012

    Of course some over-socialized Swede would say something like this. Go back to your pampered land of Spotify and cradle-to-grave handouts.  


    bilbo Friday, December 21, 2012

    Visitor Saturday, December 22, 2012

    I'm not dead yet! 'tis just a flesh wound.


    guitarcrazy Friday, December 28, 2012

    They should write checks to us all...just because

     

     

     


OUR SPONSORS

Most Read

44

The VinylRecorder T560: It Lets You Make Your Own Vinyl, at Home...

49

Dear Congress: Please Consider These Points for Your Massive Copyright Overhaul...

45

Let's Add 'Burnout' to the List of Artist Problems...