Follow Us

DMN on Feedburner
Connect with:
divider image

Chordify Automatically Extracts Chords from Your Favorite Songs…

Screen shot 2014-03-10 at 2.11.28 PM

Have you heard of Chordify? Amazingly, I hadn’t heard of it until today.  

The service takes music from YouTube, SoundCloud, Deezer, or a track you’ve uploaded and extracts the chords from it.

Chordify’s Deezer integration just went live, with that they’ve also launched an app in Deezer’s App Studio.

The service shows you the chords as the track is playing, letting you play along.  If you want to know the technicals behind the automated service, Chordify has a detailed explanation.

Screen shot 2014-03-10 at 2.48.28 PM

I tested Chordify with a couple different songs and it was fairly accurate.  I was impressed, considering it is a free and automated service.  There are also premium features you can pay for, such as transposition and tempo change.

Like me, you may be wondering if this is copyright infringement.  After all, lyrics sites have to work out licensing deals with labels.  This is what Chordify has to say:

“Unlike lyrics or melody, chord progressions are not innovative and sufficiently unique to be copyrighted on their own. In fact, some chord progressions are particularly popular, and are used in exactly the same shape by hundreds of popular songs!”

However, they will remove individual songs if the copyright owner requests they do so.

Screen shot 2014-03-10 at 2.14.43 PM

blue bar background graphic
Comments (24)
  1. Aderra

    Neat idea but doesn’t work very well. I tried it on a few Soundcloud tracks and it got about 70% of the chords wrong.


    Reply
  2. Me

    Metallica will still try to sue…


    Reply
  3. Minneapolis Musician

    I suppose it is fine for simple, regular pop or blues chord progressions. But it failed on the more complex stuff of mine I fed into it. I was disappointed. I hope they improve it.


    Reply
  4. River Waters

    An AWFUL idea! You can NOT learn to play if you don’t train the ear to understand what’s being played. No computer will ever EVER train you in the skills you must have to master the instrument. I spent many years ripping songs off records decades ago — the result is that I can master the progression in most songs I hear within a few minutes of hearing them. And how that training helps playing — immeasurably! STAY AWAY from this hogwash. Do it the hard way — the right way — and you WILL benefit more than you can ever know.


    Reply
    1. Victor

      It’s not an awful idea! Having new tools in front of you to learn is very important. You don’t have to have a good ear to learn a song! In the old days we had song books to learn, but if you or I had this technology in the old days when we couldn’t find a song in a songbook, we would have used it, and it would have saved us countless hours. And NOT every song is in a songbook. If you can see the chords in front of you and you can learn to play them NOW, you’ll be successful. Some people are visual and it helps to see the chords and that progression. If you’re learning by ear, and you don’t know theory, you’re screwed. Can you imagine how good you’d be if you could hear & SEE what you were playing when you were learning? Don’t be so closed minded to new ideas. Nothing takes the place of hands on learning and practice, but new tools are always helpful to get the job done! Now, maybe this technology/software does suck, but it’s NOT a bad idea, it just needs to be refined.


      Reply
  5. Walter Gross

    This is becoming a trend these days. There is another one called http://www.youtab.me but sadly none of these tools get the chords right.

    My go to track to test is Deacon Blues by Steely Dan and neither youtab or Chordify are even close to being accurate.

    They also limit the voicings to triads. No 7ths or upper extensions.

    This technology has a long way to go and these companies are way too premature in rolling it out with so many warts.


    Reply
    1. josh

      youtab lets you fix the results, I think they are aware of the shortcomings of the technology


      Reply
  6. James Edgar

    River is correct. Stupid Idea .I think you have to learn to transcribe to progress as a guitar player . This kind of app is not helpful really. there are no short cuts.


    Reply
    1. Paul Resnikoff

      Why not BOTH? Yeah, when I was learning bass when I was 15, yeah, I learned chords by playing along with my favorite songs. And then I checked it all with a books I could find, an instructor, etc. Maybe I got the tabs sheet, and played along.

      But what if I had had this? I would have sucked a lot less!


      Reply
      1. River Waters

        It sucks only because you haven’t yet learned to do it. Education is not necessarily fun or easy. Stop taking the low road. Do it right.


        Reply
  7. David

    It is a common misconception that chord progressions are not subject to copyright. It is true that in modern commercial pop and rock genres, the chord progressions are usually so simple that it would be difficult to prove that any similarity is due to copying. But where chord progressions are more complex and original – as they often were in the 60s and 70s – a complaint of copyright infringement would have a better chance of success. E.g. anyone who tried copying a chord progression as distinct as that of Strawberry Fields would be running a risk.


    Reply
    1. Minneapolis Musician

      David,

      Are you certain about that?

      I think it’s more about the “sound” — which is a production choice and what instruments are used, with what timbe — rather than the chords. Not to mention the tempo.

      One could play the chords behind Strawberry fields at a fast tempo on Irish whistle and kazoo, in a march rhythm, and I doubt if anyone is going to think that’s infringement.

      One enjoyable exercise I occasionally like to do is grab a karaoke backing track from a song I have never heard of, and sing a new melody and lyric over it, just for fun. Then I go look up the original song and listen to what is was. I defy people to tell me what the underlying original song was, particularly when I add other instruments on top of it.

      http://www.reverbnation.com/GlennGalen


      Reply
      1. David

        I don’t know of any actual court case that has decided the issue one way or the other. It probably wouldn’t be worth even trying to sue unless the similarity was very blatant and the ‘copier’ was making a lot of money from the song. I just think it is a bit of an urban myth among musicians that chord progressions can be copied with impunity. I don’t know of anything in either statute or case law to say that – but I’m not a lawyer , and if anyone can give me a definite precedent I will happily give way!

        This article by a lawyer seems pretty firm that a chord progression could in principle be protected by copyright:
        http://legalit.com.au/legaliblog/?p=28 But it is an Australian site and the law may be different in the US. I just can’t find any reliable source for the opposite view. Likewise, there is a common assumption that a rhythm cannot be copyright, but I don’t know of any source for that either.


        Reply
        1. Minneapolis Musician

          Yeah, I’d be convinced if I saw even one case where a plaintiff actually won a judgement for copyright infringement due to the chord progression alone.

          Sounded like that lawyer from Australia was speaking theoretically, not from actual case law precedence.


          Reply
  8. GGG

    Or people could stop being lazy “musicians” and figure this stuff out on their own.


    Reply
  9. Waiting for TuneHunter

    I`m waiting for TuneHunter`s money spam…..


    Reply
  10. Willis

    And in other news, if musicians today actually understood music they could extract chords themselves.


    Reply
  11. PDMusicComposer

    Sounds very similar to Songle from Japan, which I tried out almost 18 months ago and worked well for what I threw at it. Take a look http://ow.ly/uxgr0


    Reply
  12. Jimbo

    This is an interesting debate…On one hand, I believe there is less people playing guitar. The “popular” music of today is so electronic and beat based ( other than Country…the “New Rock”) there’s hardly any chords to extract. So that leaves the classics, which have been tabbed 10 different ways already, so it’s true, most musicians can learn a song “by ear” in a short time, why do we need this app? Matter of fact, this technology/ mentality has been around for decades…ever see a Player Piano!


    Reply
  13. CharlesS

    Seriously? People can’t identify basic pop music chord progressions and need software to figure it out?
    How sad.


    Reply
  14. mike

    I’m having a good time with it. I have only been playing the bass for about a month, I learned all the notes on the fret board within a week, and can actually play many songs, I just add what ever notes sound good between the chords on the bass.


    Reply
  15. Tone deaf

    I’m just amazed how snobbish you musicians are. This is great fun for crap guitarists like me who are never going to be any good but just love messing about . If you are that good ..what are you even doing looking at this site. Be joyous but remember Grace Slick sang on Manhole….” You know it’s only music…don’t hang on too tight ..don’t try to read too much into it.. ” now where’s my out of tune old guitar..just got to try Boz Scaggs Corrina Corrina…


    Reply

Leave a Reply

Connect with:


3 × = twelve

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  1. OUR SPONSORS

  2.  
  3. Most Heated!