Caren Kelleher is the manager of unsigned bands True Mad North and The Lighthouse and the Whaler. She is also the business development lead at Songkick and an HBS grad to boot. Here, she talks about some surprising lessons learned while raising $10,200 in Kickstarter cash for Lighthouse.
Though he had been an apprentice to the great musicians of Vienna and was even declared "the new Mozart" by the Magazine of Music, Beethoven had yet to find a constant revenue stream to support his career.
Lucky for Ludwig, some noblemen in Vienna recognized his talent and came to the rescue, offering patronage in the form of grants, just as aristocrats did for Renaissance artists. In those days there were no record labels fighting to sign Beethoven, nor publishers interested in royalties; instead there were just some influential fans that had an interest in keeping this musician around - and spreading their considerable cultural influence.
Today, as we watch the labels shift and recorded revenue streams dry up, the idea of patronage has resurfaced. Platforms like Kickstarter and Pledge Music market themselves as direct financing engines and have helped artists raise some serious cash. And this can work: I just raised more than $10,000 on Kickstarter, but not before learning some surprising lessons.
Early patronage came around when music was a cultural, not capitalistic, undertaking. Even now, when bands can offer recordings, t-shirts and collectibles, early fans are still in it for the influence, not the swag.
Consider a sample of thirty recently-successful music projects on Kickstarter. In comparing the number of backers against pledge packages selected and dollars raised, it turns out that 30% of funding came from backers that did not select merchandise packages to match their pledge amounts. In other words, one-third of each successful Kickstarter project came from fans that either didn't want stuff, or bought it separately on their own. It turns out that superfans simply aren't that motivated by merch.
That would explain the frustrating results for a number of fan-funded start-ups built on incentives. They offer things like stock options, exclusive merchandise, and access to artists. But nothing has really taken off, because that is not why fans generally lend support. If fans were motivated by finances or freebies, they would be in the music business.
Beethoven may have collected tips in Viennese cafes, but those micropayments didn't finance great symphonies. Likewise, promising musicians will not build careers on micropayments alone; they will require larger individual investments from modern-day patrons. This is already happening, whether or not artists are aware of it.
It is hard to derive real insight from the successes of d-to-c financing campaigns, absent case studies. Yet one artist recently told me that he received a $2,000 Kickstarter pledge from a man who wanted Executive Producer credits, even though that was not an advertised pledge package. I have also met former industry executives and financiers who are now operating as cultural investors, just like Viennese aristocrats of Beethoven's day. But these days, the motivations could be philanthropic, cultural, or part of a strategic career move.
This is the hardest thing to get over. But unless an artist discovers himself to be the Pied Piper and mesmerizes everyone within earshot, artists of the future will find it increasingly difficult to compete for fans' attention and wallet-share. This will be especially true as more and more artists pursue the same financing routes and overwhelm fans with the same call to action.
Consider the numbers I encountered. Just 1.3% of The Lighthouse and the Whaler's online fans contributed to our Kickstarter campaign - a good response rate were it a traditional direct marketing campaign. But few DIY bands would know that to be normal. The consequence is that many will look at their Facebook or MySpace fan counts and overestimate how much money they can raise.
Yet this is ultimately the wrong number game. Not all fans are created equal, yet history has shown that it takes just a few important fans to make a huge difference. The artists that recognize this will differentiate themselves, at least when it comes to financing.

Comments Closed
@amaccardo Wednesday, June 08, 2011
Anthony Accardo
awesome fan funding article

Jmiles Thursday, June 09, 2011
Any kind of funding is hard-You have to keep your eye on the prize and don't take turn downs personally-I have raised enough money for our new Global Noize Release-You also have to show what the money is being spent on to gain investor confidence

@MakeItInMusic Thursday, June 09, 2011
Make It In Music
Great post

Jim Thompson Thursday, June 09, 2011
Not completely accruate on Beethoven. He sold works to patrons (which you could say were THE record companies), peformance income, publishing, and most importantly, teaching.
Plus, Beethoven was not good with money and his deafness absolutely tortured and influenced his writing.

itsover Thursday, June 09, 2011
Interesting to see an article reference classical music. Since recorded music has only been around for about 100 years, musicians for the previous 10,000 years of civilization had to find other means of revenue and support.
So why arent symphonic/philharmonic musicians (or fans!) raging that "something must be done" to bring back the revenue stream that we used have in the 'golden age'....?

Mojo Bone Sunday, June 12, 2011
They are. Several US small-market symphony orchestras have gone out of business over the last 18 months. Generational shifts in attitude toward our European cultural heritage are being blamed, mostly. Music that is written down might also be considered to have been 'recorded'.

@TravisWWWebb Thursday, June 09, 2011
Travis Webb
Great article

@DjWim Thursday, June 09, 2011
Sebastien Ouimet
Interesting article!

Maxwellian Thursday, June 09, 2011
Really? I find comparisons to Renaissance or classical patronage are a serious stretch, because everything was radically different in those eras. We are talking about mass consumption music today, not high brow intelligensia or noble culture. There are some common threads but not many.
:MW

@HBSeclub Thursday, June 09, 2011
HBS eClub
Great...

Vail, CO Thursday, June 09, 2011
amazing!
The Lighthouse and the Whaler can finally afford Tunecore distribution fees.

John Pointer Thursday, June 09, 2011
I totally agree, and would add that once an artist raises the money, they have to shift a lot of their
attention away from music, and toward project management and order fulfillment.
Having experienced firsthand the same things you did, I created Patronism.com which ties directly into what you discovered, but is scaled for any compelling musician to use. Unlike Beethoven, who needed a few wealthy donors to underwrite the sum of his expenses, Patronism makes it easy for any fan to become a patron via subscription.
Subscriptions create monthly income for artists, so they can concentrate on making more music, which directly benefits the subscribers.
You are right, major patrons want influence, but
fans want engagement, and a sense of participation.
It's also true that a
smaller portion of the fanbase will elect to become subscribing patrons, but we have found that this model out-earns merch and CD sales.
So relating to the comment about the recording industry only being 100 years old... I think that's right on the money. You could say the future of music is ancient history.

@patronism.com Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Hey, I had this idea! I think it is great, and I'd like to see it brought to fruition, however 15% is way too high.
Paypal has a very sophisticated database for it's users, with a lot more overhead, and their fees for passing money from A to B in the form of a subscription is under 4%. See their fee structure here: http://bit.ly/oWrTs7
Unless you come into line with these kinds of fees, your service will simply be circumvented by paypal. I don't see where you are adding enough value where patrons would opt for your service over a simple paypal subscription. Maybe I'm missing something.
Kudos on the holocaracy form of management - I'm a big fan of the model.

@MakeItInMusic Thursday, June 09, 2011
Make It In Music
3 KEY tips for your fan funded project

meg Thursday, June 09, 2011
It turns out there's a huge class of benevolent patrons, and they have lots of money. They're donating like crazy, and they care about you and just want you to do well.
They're called: Parents.

RnBMistress Friday, June 10, 2011
Good article. Someone has to really believe in YOU and your MUSIC in order for them to invest in you. Thanks for sharing.

@ronproulx Friday, June 10, 2011
ronproulx
the way it really works... or doesn't

@MilkBoyTommy Saturday, June 11, 2011
Tommy Joyner
Take inspiration, you fan-funders...

@dmdotc Monday, June 13, 2011

Guagua Electrica Tuesday, June 14, 2011
Interesting observations.
So let's start calling this what it is:Patronage.
Wealthy folk buying status and cultural influence via ties to artists.

OUR SPONSORS
Follow Us