If you're serious about your career, then you want it to last for decades. Hobbyists are happy with 15 minutes of fame on YouTube, not real artists. But let's face it - if you are lucky enough to enjoy such a run, most of your marketing and online partners won't make it for the ride. The terrain is simply too flaky and unstable, and that demands a centralized, control-oriented approach.
Just look at your partners right now. How many have a stable and profitable business model? And, how many have been around for more than five years? Exactly.
In fact, you will probably rifle through dozens of different partners over a multi-decade run. And artists that survive the test of time must closely manage their own content, strategy, and fan relationships. Because a sinking partner could destroy years of fan data and direct-to-fan infrastructure if not managed properly. It can send you and your marketing team into survival mode, and away from creative growth, touring, or fan-building.
So, why such a flaky terrain? The problem right now is that very few companies serving artists and marketing teams have stable sources of income. Look past the hype, and most are not making money, because most bands are not making any money. That goes for the biggest label - ie, UMG - or the smallest DIY startup. Labels are hemorrhaging cash, and DIYers are struggling to make ends meet.
Bandcamp may be your ally right now, but will they be around in ten years? Or, owned by the same group of people? Will its recent monetization experiment work? If not, it needs to be a short-term issue for you, not a game-changing fail.
There was a major debate last week about the role of the artist website. The central question, first sparked at the Bandwidth Conference in San Francisco, was whether an artist should skip the page entirely and simply rely on a collection of partner companies. The list included Facebook, MySpace, Soundcloud, iContact, Bandcamp, Wordpress, even Apple.
Predictably, most sided with the controlled artist page, and offered a range of highly-detailed reasons. And the biggest among those focused on control. "How much time was devoted by artists on MySpace over the past 5 years?" asked Constantine Roussos of startup .music. "All your 'friends' left and unless you captured their emails through your official site, then you are in trouble."
Taking it one step further, others recommended a structure that puts the site at the center of a very vibrant site ecosystem - even if the artist page is not the most-trafficked component. It just makes sense from a growth and stability perspective.
Paul Resnikoff, Publisher.

Comments Closed
@universalindie (via Twitter) Wednesday, September 01, 2010
Hobbyists are happy with 15 minutes of fame on YouTube, not real artists

@Natalie_Brown (via Twitter) Wednesday, September 01, 2010

Natalie Brown Wednesday, September 01, 2010
Paul, what a fabulous and concise article.
I got my start in music in 1997 and was one of the first artists to use online in my marketing strategy... saw MP3.com come and go and watched a lot of hopes die in flames along with the site. I quickly learned that one can't invest in these platforms too heavily as they are, as you say incredibly unstable. There has to be a balance between 'new model' and 'old model' marketing that you must make work for you as an artist.
As for the artist web site, it is the only online medium which you have complete control over. You own the domain name and you can hook in apps as they come and go or link to sites as they come and go, but you will never be left in a sinking online Titanic. Your site only comes down if you wish to take it down.
Thanks for your informative and timely info!
Best,
Natalie

@ThomasBech (via Twitter) Wednesday, September 01, 2010

Hadi Wednesday, September 01, 2010
The problem in most cases is that artists just want to go where the action is, not belabor a site that requires a server, experts, and other issues. Believe me I know that every site whether Facebook or CD Baby or whoever is happy to oblige for little to no money.
I know what you're going to say - get Bandzoogle! Get Bandcamp! but those guys can go out of business too!
Just look at NING - not out of business, but investors made them change their model. It's NOT about you and your fans - it's about their ojbectives.

cramerbob Thursday, September 02, 2010
Paul, I couldn't agree with you more.
If artists are serious about building a long-term career, then they need to take direct control of their online presence, fans, and sales.
Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, Apple's new Ping, and the next 5 social networks for musicians and fans, as well as new distribution channels play a big role. As a serious musician, you should be everywhere your fans are - but your focus and investment should be on building your music, your brand, and very importantly your fan base. But the ONLY place where you have 100% control remains your primary website, so it still needs to remain an important component of your web presence and fan engagement strategy.
There are products such as Nimbit (shameless plug - sorry) that enable artists to manage their web site content, online storefronts (on your website, Facebook, MySpace, blogs, etc.), manage your product catalog (physical and digital music, merch, tickets), fan lists, fan messaging, and content to all your major social networks, online properties, and email lists - all from a single online dash.
This way your investment is leveraged to everywhere you want to be today and tomorrow, without betting on what channel or social network will "win" in the future.
And also to your point - there are very few long-standing players in the online tools for musicians and Direct-to-Fan (D2F) market. Nimbit's been around since 2004, and we expect to be there to help musicians build successful careers for many years to come.
Bob Cramer
Chairman & CEO, Nimbit

@vdovault (via Twitter) Thursday, September 02, 2010
Do artists need websites? Is Facebook/MySpace/Twitter enough? Nimbit's CEO explains it all ...

@musiciansrights (via Twitter) Thursday, September 02, 2010
Musical landscape not conducive to longevity...

DezRyan Thursday, September 02, 2010
I agree. The landscape does not foster longevity. And the erosion of the music business and the massive hemorrhaging of money due to file sharing is not exclusive to music content any longer. More and more movies and TV are joining this endless money drain on the copyrights of artists and their management and labels and distributors.
How will it all shake out? What can we do as creators and artists and managers and distributors? Who can make the new model? Is it smart subscriptions ONLY that will work like quaint ideas that learn the habits and tastes of its users from use (Pandora) and run off a commercial model for profit -- but who gets the commercial money? The web site? The artists? Is it in true balance with the amount of content digested on a site like this? is it really comparable to the radio model of old in terms of royalty checks for artists and their business partners? Or how about the mega content subscription destinations with EVERYTHING just about you could ever want to hear and its all searchable and cross referenced (Spotify)?
Again, does the money off subscriptions and commercial revenue really cover the true royalty to the artists off the old radio standard? If you or anyone you know has the exact answer of how this copyright infringement through file sharing at no cost thing will play out to its final beat. Please let the artists and producers and distributors and all our partners know what the answer is so we can all forge our route via the inside info on the future of our wired world.
But the reality is erosion at this point in all media via free file sharing and copyright infringement is seemingly inevitable. To my mind the problem is we need a viable solution that users agree with and don't feel rapped by -- that is a better solution than FREE or mega punishment for stealing online content. What to do!
My biggest lament is the loss of credible income streams for artists everywhere - starting harshest with music and I'm sure as we will all see continuing to movies, videos, TV, computer software, games and published works as well. You think ebooks will be immune just cuz there's an ipad now? No media that can be digitized is immune to file sharing now. Maybe the solution is a combination of tracking security embedded in content and minimal penalty instead of these MEGA fines. I.e. A user is fined a relative nominal fee for stealing and use of content ($2.00 for a TV show or Movie? .25 cents for a single track? 2.00 for an album?) The fine is levied by his or her Internet provider and if the content isn't registered and returned -- deleted off thew computer or a link showing return of content then the fine jumps to worth (9.99).
Now they can keep it if they want to after the second fine. can we do this? can we track everything that changes hands on the Internet? so lets agree on a fine structure that fits the content model with smaller fines for use without rights? just an idea. And it becomes part of the "I Accept" legal document when logging onto use the Internet from any portal or through any destination. And we have to enter details to our credit cards or banks or at least personal details needed for accounts. And free Internet providers are required by the FCC to have these same details on file for all Internet users. And agreement of auto charge for fines. And you get the warning box popping up "warning you are about to steal... It will charge your card $2.00 so be warned, you hit the I Agree so be warned now content thief.
(= haha I don't know. just an idea. -- DEZ RYAN 09/02/2010 www.rawsessions.ie

Robbie Jenkins Thursday, September 02, 2010
VERY insightful It also served as confirmation for some recent thoughts and discussions I have had.

keithmohr Thursday, September 02, 2010
Paul, I have been serving independent Christian artists since 1997, have never had an investor, and have made over $1,000,000 doing it.
It can be done.. How? Serving your clients, going above and beyond, and being consistent.
We've seen many success stories, both from the industry and indie-stry!
keith mohr
president
http://www.indieheaven.com

MisterSoftee Thursday, September 02, 2010
Hate to offend the higher powers but that's $75k a year in revs

keithmohr Friday, September 03, 2010
yep, I know.. its enough to keep one person in business.

OUR SPONSORS
Follow Us