1. Home

Streaming Music vs. Downloading, 2015

Paul Resnikoff
10

I. Total number of streams versus total number of downloads (2015)

Streaming Music vs. Downloading, 2015

II. Total revenues from streaming versus total revenues from downloads (2015).

Streaming Music vs. Downloading, 2015

Methodology.

Sources: Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and Nielsen data for 2015, supplied to Digital Music News.  Nielsen data finalized and supplied to DMN in January of 2016; RIAA data furnished earlier this month.

Streaming figures includes audio and video on-demand data from leading platforms like Spotify, YouTube/VEVO, Google Play, SoundCloud, Beats/Apple Music, MediaNet, Rhapsody, Xbox Music, and others.  Streaming data is on-demand only, and doesn’t include ‘non-interactive’ internet radio platforms like Pandora, iHeartRadio, or Slacker (though this may be incorporated as a comparison for later).

Total on-demand interactions and total track/album downloads calculated by Nielsen Soundscan, and reflect paid-only downloads (i.e., not pirated, torrented, stream-ripped, etc., downloads).  Revenue figures calculated entirely by RIAA, released earlier this month. ‘Streaming vs. Downloading’ comparison is a US-based comparison, with both Nielsen and the RIAA national data monitors.

Projections into 2016 (and beyond).

In terms of overall growth and projections, the disparities between paid downloads and streaming will only intensify.  According to RIAA data, ‘Download Single’ sales plunged 14.9 percent last year alone (in terms of total transactions), with ‘Download Album’ sales dropping 7.0 percent (also in terms of total transactions).  Those declines are likely to intensify in 2016, while streaming is highly likely to continue surging.

Within streaming, weak revenues could be addressed by an increase in paid subscribers, who drive far greater revenue and free, ad-supported users.  Paid subscribers are definitely increasing: just recently, Spotify announced its 30 millionth paying subscriber (worldwide), Apple Music is pushing past 11 million (from nothing last year), and Tidal has just announced its 3 millionth subscriber (from roughly 1 million last year).  That said, YouTube remains the fastest-growing streaming platform, and Spotify’s total user base is estimated to have reached 100 million.

Written while listening to Mark Storie on the Toolroom Radio podcast.

10 Responses

  1. Bill

    Lame. Where is the chart showing the total number of times those downloads are played (over the entire lifetime of the download)? What a stupid comparison.

  2. Remi Swierczek

    Antique method and avant-garde method – both UNPRODUCTIVE!

    Let’s have subscription and advertising free streaming and let’s have DOWNLOAD as an addition to the playlist!
    DISCOVERY MOMENT MONETIZATION – the only method to COLECT CASH and have thriving $200B music industry. Get me to Larry Page, please!
    The labels just refuse to STOP own suicide.

  4. Ari Herstand

    The RIAA’s own report actually states that streaming pulled in greater revenue than digital downloads last year. Of the total recorded music revenue, streaming accounted for $2.4 Billion (34.3% of the total), whereas digital downloads were slightly LESS only accounting for 34% of the total. Physical sales were 28.8% and Synch was 2.9%.

    Curious why your numbers are so drastically different from the RIAA’s report.

    • Paul Resnikoff

      The difference is that the RIAA statement lumps non-interactive (ie internet radio) and interactive (on-demand) into one streaming pot. This only compares on-demand with downloading.

  6. Jerry

    Interesting research. You might want to read this article that goes into a bit more strategic detail around royalties and distribution models in the music biz: http://bit.ly/29ux54U