YouTube Red, oddly enough, is in the red.
YouTube Red launched late last year with big plans. The company wanted to provide a solid alternative for other services like Hulu and Netflix. After all, a company as big as YouTube launching their own paid video service, with growing total monthly viewers, what could go wrong?
Top sources told The Verge that Red has only scored 1.5 million paid subscribers at the end of the summer. Another 1 million users signed up, but just on a trial basis. This shows that people are accustomed to watching video content for free, and aren’t willing to pay up — just yet. This also underscores people’s interest in YouTube Music, which launched last November, and requires a Red subscription.
Another contributing factor with low paid subscriptions is that Red has launched in only four countries so far: the United States, Mexico, Australia, and New Zealand. Red outpaces the growth of similar services, like CBS All Access and Sling TV. The company says that Red paid subscriptions are also the heaviest video users. The company also stated that people with Red subscriptions watch 75% more YouTube on their TV than non-subscribers.
According to The Verge, Tidal grew faster in its first year. The music streaming service now owned by Jay Z scored 2.1 million subscribers against Red’s 1.5 million. Though, the service did roll out in more countries, an error that is costing Red.
YouTube doesn’t appear fazed by the low numbers. In a statement to the website, the company stated,
“We’re pleased with momentum behind…Red and we’re seeing healthy growth of members each month. While we don’t release or comment on speculative numbers, we’re seeing strong engagement of the service in the four countries we’ve launched, leading us to invest in more originals series and movies for 2017 and increased marketing of YouTube Music.”
We covered Red’s launch last year. According to the New York Times, company executives threatened to eliminate content from major media companies who did not support Red.
Dear Sirs – Tidal has only $47mn in annual revenue. It does not have 2.1mn subscribers.
According to a Billboard, Tidal reported 3 million subscribers in their first year. Take a look. http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/hip-hop/7317826/tidal-three-million-global-subscribers-kanye-west-pablo-streams You can also check out the core numbers here: http://www.billboard.com/articles/business/7317891/tidal-one-year-anniversary-by-the-numbers
Yeah, it had 3m after year; The Verge’s 2.1m reported it’s number of new subscribers (so 0.9m is number of WiMP’s/Aspiro users before Jay-Z deal).
Interesting fact about Tidal: it has +700k users in Poland due to Tidal-Play telecom deal. If you have Play’s mobile phone subscription, you have acces to Tidal premium tier.
I wonder if those 0.7m (now probably +800k, 700k was reported in August) active users are counted into Tidal’s subscriptions number.
YouTube Red has no appeal to the vast majority of people..
Are companies thinking customers might have 2 or 3 video streaming services and one or two music streaming services..
People also having to pay the gas bill, electricity bill, water bill, insurance bill,
car payments, petrol/gas, bus/train fares, rent/mortgage, food, education
and loads of other living expenses..
How much disposable money do these companies think people have available for discretionary entertainment spending.
YouTube Red is a super service and a bargain. The playback is smooth without commercial interruptions and the navigation is faster. Plus, the Ggogle Play Music feature that is included is terrific– the most underrated streaming music service out there.