Artist Activist David Lowery Quits the Mechanical Licensing Collective After Just 4 Months

David Lowery
  • Save

David Lowery, a longtime champion for artists and outspoken critic of major streaming platforms, has abruptly departed the Mechanical Licensing Collective’s Unclaimed Royalties Oversight Committee.

The news comes as the paint is still drying on the Mechanical Licensing Collective, or MLC, which was created following the passage of the Music Modernization Act into law last year. The Unclaimed Royalties Oversight Committee of the MLC is focused on matching and paying unclaimed mechanical royalties from streaming services in the U.S., an amount that has been estimated to be as high as $1.5 billion.

The current MLC contract was awarded in July by the U.S. Copyright Office, after an unsuccessful bid by rival group American Mechanical Licensing Collective (AMLC).

David Lowery’s abrupt resignation follows the departure of two other MLC members, including one committee member and a board member. The circumstances of those departures are unclear, though it appears that a health issue and a conflict-of-interest concern drove those exits.

Word of Lowery’s departure comes from multiples sources, including those inside the MLC, and is not yet official.  Lowery himself has not responded to an inquiry to Digital Music News (though, in fairness, we only emailed him this morning).

*Update: Lowery has responded to DMN and confirmed his departure.  He says he is “just overextended and don’t have bandwidth for the committee.”

The obvious question is why David Lowery really opted to bail, though the MLC has been maligned by accusations of intentional financial impropriety.

Critics have lambasted the MLC and its major publishing backers — including Sony/ATV, Warner/Chappell, and UMPG — for conspiring to claim more than $1 billion in unmatched mechanicals from platforms like Spotify, even though those royalties do not belong to them.

The major publishers, represented by the NMPA, have been sharply criticized for constructing an artificially short timeframe for allowing claims, with the intent of dividing the unclaimed amounts among themselves.

Other members named to the Unclaimed Royalties Oversight Committee include Phil Cialdella (Atlas Music Publishing), Patrick Curley (Third Side Music), Michael Eames (PEN Music Group), Frank Liwall (The Royalty Network, Inc.), Kathryn Ostien (TRO Essex Music Group), Kay Hanley, Dan Navarro and Tom Shapiro.  Incidentally, that list also included songwriter, producer, and music executive busbee, who has since passed away.

Separately, major streaming services are rumored to be balking at the MLC’s $66.25 million funding request.

Astoundingly, the MLC has requested a funding tranche of $66.25 million to finance the first two years of operation. That amount would be paid by platforms like Spotify, Apple Music, and Amazon Music, though sources close to the process have indicated substantial pushback on the expensive price. Both sides have been told to agree on a workable budget, though the Copyright Office may be forced to intervene in the event of a stalemate.

Just recently, AMLC cofounder Jeff Price accused members of the MLC of instructing streaming platforms to stop matching mechanical licenses to artists. Allegedly, MLC representatives made the requests so that funds could be funneled into the as-yet-unformed MLC, though the MLC issued legal threats against Price following the accusations.


4 Responses

  1. Anonymous

    Well this doesn’t exactly inspire confidence in the MLC. I was hoping he would be one of the people working to keep those guys honest. I know, the idea of “keeping them honest” is probably far-fetched, but it would’ve liked for him to play a part in this. I wish him a speedy recovery.

  2. Dean Hajas

    How about SOCAN – CIPO close the back door for sub- publishers abusing the music industry through Canada’s weak Copyright. No audio sample associated with a registry, no authentication process to determine true ownership of Copyright, not just a New SR Sound Recording.
    I find it humorous for Jeff Price to pipe up Calling the Box .. Black.. SOCAN / ISWC codes have been circumvented and altered every time they up-date their cataloging system. CISAC / ISWC network correspond with the manipulations of codes related to SOCAN – IPI – work order #’s.
    Adding variance to title, then releasing on the other side of the world, generating new ISRC codes, who evidently don’t play well with CISAC coding. It’s a mess created to generate and facilitate an “Orphaned Royalty “ scheme. How about taking the eyes off of the cash arriving back at ASCAP for a Minute. Let’s look at where the cash came from .. any guesses…? Or facts ..? Please feel free to Chime in.