Can AI Own IP? U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Opens Inquiry into Artificial Intelligence

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Opens Inquiry Into Artificial Intelligence
  • Save

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Opens Inquiry Into Artificial Intelligence
  • Save
“Artificial Intelligence” by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay.

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more and more common in today’s society, and as it continues to advance, it is raising new questions and challenges. One of these challenges is whether computers, in the form of AI, can create intellectual property that could be copyrighted, and if so, whether it could infringe on the copyrights of others. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is seeking input from the public on these issues through a questionnaire it has released.

Artificial intelligence is a broad term that can refer to many different things. It can refer to advanced algorithms that allow computers to process information in an intelligent manner, or to systems that attempt to mimic human thought. In recent years, the latter systems have become so advanced that they could potentially fool a human into thinking that they are communicating with an actual person, which has long been the standard for determining whether a computer system has achieved intelligence. But could these same systems one day create intellectual property?

The USPTO is seeking to answer this question through its public questionnaire, as it believes that “AI poses unique challenges in the sphere of intellectual property law.” The first question the office asks is whether a work produced by an AI algorithm or process, without the involvement of a natural person contributing expression to the resulting work, should qualify as a work of authorship protectable under U.S. copyright law, and why or why not.

The questionnaire goes on to ask other related questions, such as whether the existing statutory language and related case law adequately address the legality of making use of copyrighted material by an AI algorithm or process that learns its functions by ingesting large volumes of copyrighted material. It also asks whether authors should be recognized for this type of use of their works, and if so, how. Additionally, the questionnaire asks whether the current laws for assigning liability for copyright infringement are adequate to address a situation in which an AI process creates a work that infringes a copyrighted work.

These are important questions, as the use of AI becomes more prevalent in many industries, including the creative arts. For example, there are already AI systems that can write news articles, compose music, and create art. If these systems create works that are protectable under copyright law, it raises questions about who owns the copyrights, and whether the creators of the AI systems should be recognized as the authors of the works.

The USPTO’s questionnaire is an important step in addressing these questions and ensuring that intellectual property law keeps pace with advancements in technology. The office is open to input beyond the questions it has asked, which means that anyone with an interest in this topic can contribute their thoughts and ideas.

It is worth noting that the issues raised by the USPTO’s questionnaire are not limited to the United States, but are relevant to many other countries as well. As AI continues to advance and become more widespread, it is likely that other countries will face similar challenges and will need to address them in their own legal systems.

In conclusion, the USPTO’s questionnaire on whether computers, in the form of AI, can create something that could be copyrighted, and whether it could infringe on the copyrights of others, is an important step in addressing the unique challenges that AI poses in the sphere of intellectual property law. The use of AI is becoming more prevalent in many industries, including the creative arts, and it is important that intellectual property law keeps pace with advancements in technology. Anyone with an interest in this topic can contribute their thoughts and ideas through the USPTO’s questionnaire, which is open to input beyond the questions it has asked.

One Response

  1. Rabbi Shlomo

    The results of their questionnaire is in. Maury: the results are in Rabbi. And here the are
    All AI software developers say they own the copyright
    All master rights owners and publishers say they own a piece of the music
    All the users of AI technology say they own the music not the labels or the software developer

    Next week on Maury: AI determines artists have been getting vasoline shoved up their ass for years by labels. AI has also determined that DMN is a sensationalist bunch of horse shit