How Much Do Major Label Artists Earn From a $9.99 Spotify Subscription?

The BPI recently revealed how much major label artists earn from a $9.99-per-month music-streaming subscription. Photo Credit: Sharon McCutcheon

A new release from the British Phonographic Industry (BPI) has shed light upon how much major label artists earn from a “typical” $9.99-per-month Spotify subscription.

The BPI disclosed this telling figure in a formal message, before the Big Three record labels’ regional heads – Warner Music UK CEO Tony Harlow, Universal Music UK & Ireland CEO David Joseph, and Sony Music UK & Ireland CEO Jason Iley – testified before the House of Commons’ Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee.

For background, the DCMS Committee in October of 2020 launched an open investigation into music streaming, and specifically its impact on record labels, artists, “and the sustainability of the wider music industry.” Singer-songwriter Nadine Shah said during one of the probe’s hearings that she has difficulty paying her rent despite boasting north of 100,000 monthly plays on Spotify. Lawmakers subsequently indicated that some artists were hesitant to participate in the investigation “because they fear action may be taken against them.”

However, the BPI defended music streaming in the aforementioned release, including by touting the amount that major label artists earn from the standard $9.99-per-month streaming-service subscription.

Stating at the outset that approximately 1,800 artists generated over 10 million streams apiece in the UK during the last year, the 48-year-old trade association proceeded to emphasize that “the top 10 artists dominated less of streaming (5%) in 2020 than was the case for CD sales (13%) in 2005.” Building upon the point, the BPI relayed that the top 1,500 artists in the UK receive an average of nine times more streams from international listeners than they receive from domestic music fans.

“Artists are receiving a higher share of revenues nowadays than they did in the CD era. As acknowledged by witnesses who have already appeared before the Committee, artist royalty rates are typically higher in streaming, commonly ranging between 20-30% – compared to CD era rates more typically at rates of 15%-20% of net PPD (and subject to deductions),” continued the BPI, before transitioning directly into the amount that major label artists earn from a $9.99-per-month streaming subscription.

“On average, based on a typical 9.99 subscription to a streaming service, labels receive gross revenues of around 4.33, of which artists receive 1.33,” proceeded the BPI.

“Of the label’s remaining share of 3.00, costs represent 2.49 (including investment into artists such as A&R and global marketing) – this leaves a label margin of 0.51. The remaining 5.67 is received by: the exchequer (VAT); the streaming service (DSP); and publishers and songwriters.”

During the nearly 210-minute-long DCMS Committee hearing featuring the Big Three labels’ UK CEOs (as well as PRS for Music CEO Andrea Martin and Phonographic Performance Limited CEO Peter Leathem), the participants mentioned today’s comparatively modest recorded-music revenues (despite growth in recent years) as well as the stiff competition associated with the streaming landscape.

And interestingly, when discussing music piracy at about the 29-minute mark of the livestream, PRS for Music’s Andrea Martin took aim specifically at stream-ripping platforms.

3 Responses

  1. Avatar
    Dean Hajas

    Dylan Smith….
    That was the shortest, unworthy document ever created. You did no investigations into the validity of the numbers, just scratch the surface of what was provided to you.

    Do us a favour….don’t write half ass articles when it comes to our income splits with streaming sites. It’s what we would call “FILLER” on an album. It’s filler on Digitalmusicnews.

    Maybe if your income relied as heavily on streaming rates you may feel inclined.

    How about lets do an article on “Orphaned Royalties” and the bogus Copyright that exists in Canada, that the sub-publishers in the USA take advantage of, then re-register tracks at SOCAN. Licensed all the way to Mint digital Licensing… with only a title ever taken, no audio sample at CIPO nor SOCAN. Doesn’t that feed the issues from the source of the services…? And how does CANADA even comply to WIPO Bene Convention, Rome Treaty and the Paris Act as this garbage circumvents Copyright Authorities by Creators..

    Lets get down to digging in to the Global issues and be willing to stick your neck out. This article is like having a fist full of darts…throwing them only lands on the outside of the board, never a bullseye.

  2. Avatar
    Robert

    It’s always some bullshit editor always focusing on the major artist or major labels. Did you forget about the Independent labels? What about how these streaming services trade our songs on the stock market under foreign CUSIP numbers where the artist and labels don’t receive any of the proceeds…..where we give them the content and get paid shit.