Spotify paid podcast subscriptions are coming next week – with creators getting 100% of revenue.
That’s drastically different than the revenue share plan detailed by Apple earlier this week. Apple’s new paid podcast subscription works similar to the Patreon model, where creators can define how they want people to pay for their shows. But it also charges podcast creators $19.99 per year to enable the subscription option and collects 30% of podcast subscription fees for the first year. After the first year, those subscription fees drop down to just 15%.
Spotify is bucking Apple’s model by letting content creators keep 100% of their paid podcast subscriptions’ fees. Spotify doesn’t allow customers to pay for its subscriptions via Apple in-app purchases. So it doesn’t have to worry about potentially splitting payments collected with Apple.
Spotify and Apple are engaged in a heated battle over the App Store and the 30% ‘Apple Tax.’ At an anti-trust hearing yesterday, Spotify’s legal counsel called Apple’s control over the App Store an ‘abusive power grab’ to control competitors. Spotify has also lodged a formal complaint with the European Union over Apple’s practices, alleging anti-competitive behavior.
Digital Music News reported on Spotify paid podcast subscriptions earlier this year. Spotify finally announced they were coming in February during its ‘Stream On’ event. However, details on how the subscription service would work were scarce.
Spotify is hoping that giving creators 100% of the revenue they earn will be more attractive than Apple’s services. Apple’s paid subscription service doesn’t require there to be any exclusivity. So content creators could set up paid subscriptions on both Apple and Spotify for those platform’s users.
But even if everything else is the same, losing 30% of your revenue in the first year and 15% afterward is huge when Spotify takes nothing. That’s especially true in the pandemic era, when creators are increasingly turning to the internet to earn a living. Spotify is hoping being generous with creators will attract more total listeners to its podcast service.
But it’s hard to trust a service like Spotify, which repeatedly refuses to pay music artists more. Spotify can forego its share of revenue to attract podcast creators, but it can’t raise music royalty rates? Something seems really off about what that says to musicians.
Spotify is spending big on podcasts and CFO Paul Vogel says they’re having a strong effect on user growth and retention. But will it always stay that way if the podcast market becomes pay-to-enjoy? Spotify won’t offer this plum deal for podcast creators forever, either.
Spotify’s showing that they care more about podcasts than music. What a move.
Spotify spending all of their money on podcasts and acquiring podcast platforms has to come from somewhere. Yes, that’s right, it comes from musicians and record companies. That’s who is really bankrolling Spotify’s push into podcasting. It’s not the shareholders.
If Spotify was smart (and fair) they would breakdown podcast revenue this way: 50% podcaster(s), 20% music artists (they built the platform) and 30% to Spotify.
Spotify will keep 30% of revenue for both music and podcasting revenues.
If you were smart, you’d realize they only keep 30% of music rev already.
If Spotify doesn’t like it, then they can go elsewhere or spend years and millions building, and marketing, their own app store. Whiney bitches.
Whats your point?