What Else? Dai$y, Hands Down, SF Musictech XIII, Who Killed MJ, The Ad Piracy Imbroglio, Pandora Data, A DIY Development, Soggy SXSW…

The subscription-based music service formerly known as ‘Daisy‘ has just raised a massive, $60 million funding round, with none other than Access Industries’ Len Blavatnik powering the consortium.  All of which further complicates life for the extremely well-funded (and still unprofitable) Spotify.  “Beats has the vision, the brand, the management team and now the investor group to effectively change the expectations and experiences of a music subscription service,” Blavatnik stated this morning.

Separately, Reuters is pointing to at least one ‘informational’ meeting involving Apple CEO Tim Cook, potentially on the topic of partnerships.

Oh, the cauldron of lifelong, excrutiating pain that awaits anyone trying to save a major label.  Which brings us to Guy Hands, who’s still talking about the ‘expensive failures’ learned while coasting the SS EMI into the rocky crag of financial insolvency.  “The part we got completely wrong was our inability to predict what would happen in the financial markets,” Hands lamented in a rough Bloomberg interview.

Feeling lucky?  SF Musictech Summit XIII has now been slated for May 28th, at the usual Kabuki Hotel haunt.  Just go.

So who really killed MJ? Fresh, unsealed documents in the ongoing wrongful death lawsuit reveal a very suspicious – and even ‘smoking gun’ – collection of emails from AEG Live executives suggesting a very strong role.  “We want to remind [Dr. Conrad Murray] that it is AEG, not MJ, who is paying his salary,” one note from AEG Live co-CEO Paul Gongaware read, in response to a missed practice ahead of the ‘This Is It’ tour.  That appears to be a direct contradiction of earlier claims from AEG that Murray wasn’t being paid by the concert giant.  “We want to remind him what is expected of him…”

You can thank David Lowery later.  Now, the Wall Street Journal is dipping its toes into the ad-funded piracy debate, part of a broader look at television piracy online.  Singled out this time?  Blockbuster and the US Forest Service, both of whom are part of a long list of advertisers found powering profits on illegal destinations.  “The ads had been supplied through Google’s AdSense, which places ads related to keywords,” the Journal reported.

Elsewhere, Pandora is opening it massive vault of usage data to media platforms Strata, Donavan, and Mediabank.  “The integrations will help advertisers understand the power of internet radio and make the smartest buying decision at both the national and local levels,” Pandora chief revenue officer John Trimble relayed.

And, which major DIY platform will be unveiling a big announcement in the coming days?  Stay tuned…

“Nobody goes there anymore. It’s too crowded…”  And the simmering discussion continues over a post-shark-jumped SXSW, with one Doritos supersized vending machine the oft-referenced ‘moment’ of jumpage.  Let’s see: this edition is guaranteed to be a throng of infinite proportions, with advertisers battling over massive ads and vending machine-style concepts; some remember the early, simple days when a stroll down Sixth Street was a casual affair.

More ahead! 

13 Responses

  1. Visitor

    “You can thank David Lowery later.”
    Why wait? 🙂
    Thank you, Mr. Lowery — your efforts are highly appreciated.

    • dangude

      Interesting stories. I’ve got a question about the timeline suggested in these stories.

      It appears that Ellen Seidler was talking about ad supproted priracy and doing something about it long before Lowery and the USC report.
      Am I wrong?

  2. Visitor

    “The ads had been supplied through Google’s AdSense, which places ads related to keywords,” the Journal reported.”
    The Journal tells the story of an independent film maker who has to spend over $30K a year — about half her profit — just to send out takedown noitces.
    I’m sure many of you recognize that picture…
    Why not invite fans to participate in the war against piracy?
    A lot of them sincerely want to help artists in any way they can.
    And many deeply resent the fact that pirates steal what ordinary people have to pay for and force artists to spend a lot of valuable time on anti-piracy measures.
    So perhaps we need a kickstarter type of site to coordinate voluntary anti-piracy work?
    There’s a lot to do: Upload fake content, find and report infringing sites and links (which is difficult to do for the individual artist as her/his IP-address(es) become blacklisted in no time), send takedown notices — and come up with new and creative solutions.
    I think a lot of fans would find this pretty cool…

    • jw

      How do you spend $30,000 on 12 months of takedown notices? Is she paying someone a fulltime salary to do this for her?
      There’s something wrong with that picture.

      • Visitor

        You try sending a few hundred DMCA notices every day…
        And first you obviously have to find out where to send them.

        • Central Scrutinizer

          C’mon $30k a year.
          Searching and locating infringing links and then sending notices is a pain in the ass but it’s not that complicated or expensive.
          If true, the copyright holder has many other works being monitored or is being ripped off by some on-line service that performs this function,

          • Visitor

            “If true, the copyright holder has many other works being monitored”
            So what? One of them was taken down 56,000 times:

            Can’t wait to hear how you would do that without assistance.

          • Visitor

            …oh, and if you know a service that doesn’t rip off their customers, then please share!

          • paul

            We’ve blown this into a full story, here (I’ll bring the conversation over, if you don’t mind).

  3. Too lazy

    to dig through WSJ.
    Did you say US Forest Service?
    Times sure are tough for Smokey these days

    • Too lazy

      Wait a minute, U.S. tax dolars are supporting pirate websites?!?!
      Sounds like a perfect headline for a politician to exploit.
      C’mon RIAA what are you paying these politicians for?

  4. Big Swifty

    So apple needs to work on their image by partnering with beats?
    Oh, how the mighty have fallen