HomePop CultureIn 1987, Prominent Jazz Musicians Wrote This Letter to Their Fans… Paul Resnikoff March 5, 201528…this was found in the sleeve of a 1987 jazz LP vinyl release. 28 Responses Anonymous March 5, 2015 …and they were right. Dave 5000 March 5, 2015 Nope MNLAKER March 5, 2015 Since it seems music is always expected to be free, everything else should be free to and If you disagree Go 2 Hell! Paul Resnikoff March 5, 2015 “you don’t have to be a computer expert…How amazingly prescient those words were. Bandit March 5, 2015 Dexter Gordon was Lars Ulrich godfather.I would be willing to bet that Dexter Gordon made more money from his appearances in movies and TV in the few years before he died than he did his decades long jazz career Myles March 5, 2015 And wasn’t this around the time the music industry started making huge profits off the sale of CDs? I guess none of the jazzers saw any of that money, they were literally dying off trying to make a living playing clubs night after night Name2 March 5, 2015 C30 C60 C90 Go! YrLic March 5, 2015 I was a serial taper. Then I stopped. I stopped when I threw out my cassette deck in favor of CDs. Then, I did downloads. I admit it. But that only put gas on the fire. I would buy as much as I could. The album art and the pride of ownership was everything. Rock on ! Tcooke March 6, 2015 Interesting. Iv been thinking about the taping when I was a kid. Before my generation, it wasn’t possible. As an impressionable and ignorant 11 year old my percieved value of music was diminished due to the ability to copy. It wasn’t anything like today obviously, but there was prestige in having the actual tape. Name2 March 6, 2015 Interesting. Iv been thinking about the taping when I was a kid. Before my generation, it wasn’t possible. As an impressionable and ignorant 11 year old my perceived value of music was diminished due to the ability to copy. It wasn’t anything like today obviously, but there was prestige in having the actual tape. To each his own. I was 11 in 1974 and I’m curious to know when you were 11 that you attach “prestige” to store-bought cassettes – another overvalued, self-inflicted industry wound which ultimately cheapened and demeaned music’s value in the marketplace (but then, I’m old).Some “radio pirates” grew up to buy all the memorable music of their AMPEX’ed youth – sometimes several times over – forgetting that music which was (to them) forgettable. Sure, some never spent a dime. These aIl boil down to anecdote collecting, but I posit that the former have had a far more positive consumer experience over the years, remained attached to and inspired by their collections, and in the end parted with money for music with less regret. Iain March 6, 2015 The critical point is where they say “Jazz is not a mass-market phenomenon.” All the arguments that go to justify the culture of ‘free’ don’t work when you try and apply them to the smaller markets. And guess what March 6, 2015 Jazz is still here. The school of Jazz in NY and others still make money and churn out young musicians. And they all know Platinum albums aren’t in their future. Nothing has changed since this letter was written. Jazz is still here and as “big” as it was in relation to cultural changes. Not technological. Which means the music industry is still wasting its time and money fighting and complaining, not learning from history. In 30 years someone will print some letter by some artist today and we can have the same conversation. Response March 6, 2015 So first, of course the losses made a difference or you’d be implying this letter wasn’t necessary. But the fact that they did matter enough to write this letter, and still matter now, what’s changed? There was a time when this all started, as you mentioned, where there was no such thing as a “major label.” Artists were the business until labels came, lots of people got robbed, things evolved, and now they’re robbed but less openly and can sue if they catch on.But not to fall off track, we’re now at a stage where the industry is circling back to where it started. And yet this time, artists can still be millionaires and certain things like promoters booking look-a-like performers is no longer possible. So all is well, history still repeating itself.But what we have today is a group of major corporations trying to hang on to their profits and trying to convince the creators that its “their” profits.Nothing has changed like I said. Only the few who monopolized a business who are feeling like that monopoly is being snatched away. Jazz is still jazz, music is still copied and stolen, artists can still be stable (though the means aren’t identical) or wealthy. Its all relative if you’re not distracted by propaganda. And instead we should be trying to work more constructively to keep money in the hands of creators. Without any preconceived notions of the value or way its defined or earned. small labe1 March 6, 2015 Absolutely right, music4less. (“and guess what” doesn’t have clue one) Not only was this ‘jazz’ letter spot on (there is no more investment in artists, there is (to a practical extent) no such thing as a “record store” anymore and if you’re lucky enough to find one, they damn sure don’t carry jazz..), etc., etc.I suggest everyone go back and look at the Lars Ulrich interview. LITERALLY EVERYTHING HE SAID and warned about came true… even more so than he worried about. Lars should no longer be a tale of caution against speaking out, but heralded as a fuckin prophet, and we need to be the witnesses and activists. If WE MUSICIANS don’t stand up RIGHT NOW, there will be nothing left to stand for. As they say, if you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for anything… the ‘new boss’ is a thousand times worse than any of the worst-case “bad label deal” of yore. wake the fuk up people! So... March 6, 2015 iTunes and Spotify aren’t record stores? You might be the one sleeping. Have you ever heard the one about the wagon wheel? Wooden tires were replaced by rubber ones. At the time you probably could have sued, lobbied, cried to the media, OR you might just realize that the innovative and progressive companies would adapt. Why do musicians think they can make art a “business” but don’t think its going to function like ALL other businesses? Yes, please all musicians, wake up! Versus March 8, 2015 They do expect it to operate like other businesses: they expect that customers will pay the asking rate for their product or do without, not wantonly steal it. No business can survive if its products are simply stolen. Anonymous March 6, 2015 If WE MUSICIANS don’t stand up RIGHT NOW, there will be nothing left to stand for.It’s so ironic isnt it?A huge group of people often known to be the ones, the voices, the true stand up guys and girls always raising their fist to injustices, and now a time finally comes where they have the opportunity to actually be more then just all talk, and look what happens, essentially they all grab their tales and turn around and head for the door, scared straight about it, which is so funny and awesome i cant even tell you…When that bugle blows artists and musicians, people with some of the loudest voices, well their knees start trembling and they get all wobbly and the sweats start happening, and they run the other way… Its not even like the bugle is blowing for a real violent war or anything, and yet these voices, these true rebels and revolutionaries, always beaking off and telling people to stand and rise up, suddenly go silent and become just ordinary working joes, unable to lead or rally people into anything, its HILARIOUS!Id say you musicians need to crap or get off the pot, but thats long gone, we have finally exposed these artists and musicians for what they are, and there is nothing wrong with that, stick to strumming strings and dancing on stage and selling t-shirts… Seems like you all are waiting around for that ONE person to lead the troops, thing is, history has shown, once that one person gets taken out, the troops scatter running scared, so im not sure any one person is going to do that again in any normal frame of mind…anyways, carry on! small labe1 March 6, 2015 .. that sounded an awful lot like a threat… Anonymous March 7, 2015 im tired of taking crap from music people and listeners for things yet all they do is sit around and talk a big game but never do anything but dance around or strum instruments, so i just really dont want to take anyones ish anymore…either be about it or dont, but dont not only not be about it but talk it up in a super passionate way like you actually care and then take it out on others for things. i mean, i stood up and said lets go, the whole music community, just splat, fell flat, nothing, so whatever, i just do not want to take a millisecond of anyones b.s. in music for anything, whether they are creators or consumers or facilitators, im not interested in it anymore. so if anyone in music doesnt like anything i do or say, doesnt like any move i make, basically they have to sit on their hands and zip their mouths, they have lost all right to even think about it, you speak only when spoken to and im not speaking to anyone in music anymore, so you basically have to become a statue mute until i feel you are worthy to exist again…hows that?😉 ... March 8, 2015 … I don’t get why you would waste your time talking to me, or anyone else for that matter. Oh, you’re full of shit, or sour grapes… either one is sufficient. Anonymous March 8, 2015 … I don’t get why you would waste your time talking to me, or anyone else for that matter. Oh, you’re full of shit, or sour grapes… either one is sufficient.Full of shit or sour grapes?Hmm, how am i full of shit and what about exactly?? and why would i have sour grapes and if so over what?im tired of the music, media, tech etc. industries and just posse people and gangs and reddit lame trolls constantly bothering me, bullying me, intimidating me, threatening me, all the time, everywhere in my life, so the only sour grapes i have is that theres nowhere or no one for me to go to that can help resolve this matter and that you all get to just continually get away with it, after ive been gutted anyways from theft and pinata play and being a target.just simply dont even engage me or reply to me, stop it already, unbelievable…what a miserable business with miserable people… Myles March 6, 2015 You may know something about music business and how there is a long history of screwing over artists so nothing has changed, great perception and great outlookbut you are absolutely ignorant of jazz and jazz history so before declaring that jazz us the same as it ever was do a little research before making yourself look stupid again I apologize March 6, 2015 Relax Myles, we’re only saying Jazz wasn’t a popular genre in 87 and its not now. But there are still working Jazz musicians young and old. That much I’m sure you can agree with. We weren’t implying any further knowledge or insights in regards to the genre. And any drop in popularity hasn’t been a result of technology or bootlegging. Its purely a cultural shift in the US, the largest music market in the world. Classical music is suffering the same fate as a result of it. No problem March 6, 2015 We can change the word purely. There’s a possibility that our “news” consisting of Kim Kardashian, our “reality” programming consisting of ignorance, and our NYC public transportation system promoting an actual campaign to “Be Polite” are all just my humble opinion that American culture is no longer suitable for music like Jazz (on a broad scale). Perhaps we’re as intellectually and artistically inclined as we were in the Jazz hay day. Or perhaps the cultural state in America in that day played no role in its popularity. I guess both are possible, I’m not being sarcastic. I’m just not very impressed at the state of this country so I could just be biased. And also too young to possibly know what the Jazz era was really like. Anonymous March 7, 2015 I remember the days of illegally copying piano rolls.*sigh*Good times. Good times… Mike Greensill May 4, 2015 Didn’t Bill Evans die in 1980? That would make this letter from even earlier than ’87. In fact I very much remember it doing the rounds. J.J.Hunt May 5, 2015 This Bill Evans is the saxophoneplayer! Glendon Gross May 6, 2015 I often hear this argument, especially from the RIAA, but I frankly don’t believe that copying hurts the music business at all, then or now. Copying a digital file increases its distribution; while it may be true that according to the law of supply and demand, the value of that digital file diminishes with unauthorized copies, the fact remains that the original artist who created the song is capable of creating many more songs. So the artist’s performance value for future performances should increase proportional to the demand for that artist’s music, and the more people hear the song, the greater the demand. (remember payola?) The people who are really losing under the new digital business model are not the musicians so much as the middle men, because it is now possible for musicians to bypass the middle men in the distribution of music. If digital files are shared, that makes the artist’s future performances worth even more than they would otherwise be. I also believe that future generations will view the time when a physical medium was required to purchase a song as the anomaly rather than the norm. Even in the days of booming record sales, there were still poor musicians who didn’t get compensated for their work (such as the original composer of the tune on which “Oye Como Va” is based, Israel Lopez Cachao. ) Even in the days of Bebop development, the writing of contrafacts was a device to avoid paying royalties on the part of the musician, because chord changes cannot be copyrighted. So the avoidance of royalties has been a part of the music business for a long, long time. Probably some record company lawyer coerced these artists into “signing” the mass-produced letter, or perhaps their signatures were used without their permission. Copying is also guaranteed under the fair-use provision of the U.S. Copyright act, as it insures that the consumer’s rights are not excessively curtailed by the businessmen who want to claim ownership of a file that has been “sold” to the original consumer. Needless to say, such inserts are not often found inside packaged music that is sold today, which may give you an idea how effective the device actually was in preventing fair-use copying of records. If I were asked to sign a similar insert, I would refuse to allow my signature to be used in that manner because I would not want a likeness of my signature to be mass-produced.