In an Effort to Curb Potentially Costly Damages, Peloton Removes Key Workout Classes

In an Effort to Curb Potentially Costly Damages, Peloton Removes Key Workout Classes

Facing a multi-million-dollar lawsuit, will Peloton’s recent move satisfy music publishers and lower costly damages?

Peloton isn’t in a good spot right now.

Currently, the fitness technology company faces a massive $150 million lawsuit from 10 different music publishers.

Filed by the National Music Publishers’ Association (NMPA), the publishers accuse the workout giant of skipping critical synchronization licenses.  Peloton uses infringing works on its music-intensive video workouts.

Speaking about the lawsuit, the NMPA wrote,

While the fitness technology company has licensed with some of the music publishing industry, it has failed to do so with a significant number of publishers, leaving a great deal of income lost to songwriters.

Essentially, the publishers accused the fitness tech company of “trampling” on their rights.

Now, Peloton has taken a major step it hopes will help resolve some of the publishers’ issues against the company.

Say farewell to the classes you’ve enjoyed.

In a letter to current members, CEO John Foley confirmed that Peloton will no longer offer certain classes.  Music publishers have sued the company for using over 1,000 unlicensed works.

Calling the lawsuit “unfortunate and disappointing,” Foley wrote,

Peloton respects the rights of all creators, including performing artists and songwriters.

Out of an abundance of caution, we have decided to remove classes that feature songs that were identified by these publishers.

Painting his company as a victim, Foley wrote that the NMPA filed the lawsuit during key licensing negotiations.

[The suit] occurred after what appeared to be fruitful discussions with most of the publishers named.

Urging the Peloton faithful not to cancel their subscriptions, Foley added that members may notice the removals “in the near term.”

I can assure you that this will not affect your experience with (or the cost of) our service, or access to the kind of music you’re used to hearing behind our instructors in the thousands of classes in our library.

In addition, Foley revealed that the company has “agreements in place with all…‘major’ publishers, record labels, and performing rights organizations.”  These agreements, he writes, allow Peloton to provide its members “a broad catalog of music that our instructors can choose from to program great classes”.

It remains unclear how the song removals will affect the $150 million lawsuit.  Plaintiffs include Downtown Music Publishing, The Royalty Network, Pulse Music Publishing, ole, peermusic, Ultra Music, Big Deal Music, Reservoir, Round Hill, and TRO Essex Music Group.

You can view the full letter below.

 


Featured image by Peloton.

4 Responses

  1. Anonymous

    As a rule I always tell people:
    If you don’t need music don’t use it.

  2. Anonymous

    This is what happens; startups see how Google steals from musicians, so they think they can get away with it as well.
    Sue them out of existence.