Why Is Juice WRLD Still Being Sued for $15 Million? Yellowcard’s Lawyer Responds

Juice WRLD, Lucid Dreams

Juice WRLD is dead — so why is he still getting sued for copyright infringement, exactly?

Before Juice WRLD suffered a tragic death from an opioid overdose, the rapper was battling a massive copyright infringement lawsuit from early-2000s punk-pop group Yellowcard.  The band claimed that Juice WRLD’s hit “Lucid Dreams” stole elements from Yellowcard’s “Holly Wood Dead,” which was released in 2006.

That case was just getting started when Juice WRLD (aka Jarad Higgins) passed away on the tarmac of Chicago’s Midway airport, a situation that prompted Yellowcard to consider its next options. At that stage, Yellowcard’s attorney, Richard Busch, told Digital Music News that his clients were pausing while ‘still digesting’ the news of Juice WRLD’s untimely death, and deciding whether to proceed with the litigation.

Just a few days later, Busch and Yellowcard members Peter Mosley, Ryan Key, Sean Wellman-Mackin and Longineu Parson decided to march forward with the case.  Strangely, ‘Juice WRLD p/k/a Jarad Higgins’ was still listed as the lead defendant.

But other named defendants are still alive, and Busch has since clarified the reasons for continuing the suit.

First of all, we were as shocked and saddened by Juice WRLD’s death as everyone else,” Busch told us.  “It is a tragic loss to his family, his fans, and to the music world at large, and we understand why people may be confused about the decision to continue with this lawsuit.  

“My clients are certainly torn about proceeding, and understand the optics involved. But  it is important to remember that this lawsuit was filed before this tragic event, and was filed because all of the defendants (and there are two other writers and several music publishers and record labels),  profited off of what we believe was clear copying and infringement of Yellowcard’s work.”

Busch’s case against Juice WRLD seems tenuous: after all, “Holly Wood Died” was released when Higgins was about 7 years old. That makes any claim of blatant infringement difficult, especially given that Yellowcard is now a relatively obscure band. Adding to the burden of proof is that Juice WRLD himself is now unable to defend himself on the stand. Accordingly, he won’t be able to offer critical information related to his exposure to “Holly Wood Died” as a child (if any).

MORE NEWS:  EMI's On-Again, Off-Again Lawsuit Against Kanye West Is Off-Again

But Busch and Yellowcard feel they still have a very solid case.

We have an expert report making [the infringement] clear,” Busch continued.  “So while they are absolutely aware of how this may be perceived, and truly have incredible mixed emotions, the question is whether it is fair that all of those many parties profited, and will continue to profit, off of what my client’s believe strongly was their work.”

Busch also took issue with our reporting on the case, specifically the $15 million price tag we assigned to the damages claim. That value is more of a rough estimate in the filing ‘based on information and belief,’ and according to Busch, actual damages could vary considerably (if they win, of course). “We should also mention that it has been falsely reported that Yellowcard is demanding a specific amount of damages,” Busch continued.

“They are simply seeking what the law allows, and what parties in their position have sought in similar cases, which at this point is not determined.”

The remaining defendants, which include Danny Lee Snodgrass Jr. aka Taz Taylor, Taz Taylor Beats, BMG Rights Management, Artist 101 Publishing Group, Nicholas Mira, Nick Mira Publishing, Electric Feel Music, Kobalt Music Services America, Songs of Universal, Grade A Productions, and Interscope Records, now have until February 4th of 2020 to respond to the complaint.

More as this develops.

 

6 Responses

  1. Avatar
    Angelito

    Two points.

    First, his death was not tragic. It was predictable and he was the author of his own misfortune.

    Second, the income streams from the alleged infringing song continue-and likely increased significantly. Why should Juicy’s heirs get a windfall?

    Reply
    • Avatar
      Juice WRLD

      Yes, it was Tragic. A famous Artist, Young as a matter of fact dies and the world feels it and your out here making rude comments no one needs your hate up around here so keep your hate to yourself like what if someone you loved died at 21 you would not be yourself so please don’t ever disrespect Juice WRLD!

      Reply
      • Avatar
        Big KRUT

        Ehhh. Predictable story about two DEAD BEAT (quite literally) artists. Not a tragedy; would have been if he died in a plane crash, like what happened to Lynard Skynard, that was random and unforeseeable. While his death is a shame (Not to me, I have no dogs in the fight, but to listeners of his God-awful music, my condolences ) it was predictable since his name implies heavy Codeine use and his halcyon as a sound cloud rapper (they die young because they gain notoriety for risky behavior NOT TALENT.)

        Nonetheless it’s a shame that Yellowcard is so desperate they need to pursue a lawsuit against a dead artist.

        Reply
  2. Avatar
    Deadboy98

    But like the only thing that sounds even remotely similar is the rhythm he sung in, how’s that copyrighted? No one owns rhythm, tho I could bemissing something, maybe the lyrics were similar but for now idk

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.