Major Labels Cracking Down on ‘Fake Stream’ Manipulation Services

Berlin, Germany’s Brandenburg Gate. Photo Credit: Ansgar Scheffold

The major labels have officially cracked down on a German streaming manipulation service called likeservice24.de.

The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and Germany’s BVMI unveiled the crackdown this afternoon, via a formal release that was emailed to Digital Music News. A Frankfurt court has issued an injunction against the “widely-used” provider of artificial streams, according to the announcement message. Likeservice24.de had also allegedly allowed customers to purchase fake views, comments, likes, and subscribers for media on various platforms.

Addressing the injunction in a statement, IFPI CEO Frances Moore said: “This is yet another positive decision in a series issued by the German courts supporting the recording industry’s ongoing fight against streaming manipulation globally. IFPI and its industry partners remain committed to tackling this harmful practice, which not only deprives artists, songwriters and other rights holders of their rightful compensation, but also misleads music fans.”

As Moore noted, this legal action against likeservice24.de is the latest in a long line of efforts from the major labels to eliminate stream manipulation – i.e. fake stream – platforms. German courts issued injunctions to five different entities back in August of 2020, following the March of 2020 shutdown of what was perhaps Germany’s largest fake-stream provider. In October of the same year, the major labels were successful in stopping six Brazilian websites from continuing to sell similar services.

Stateside, Spotify recently made headlines for kicking off 2021 by removing hundreds of thousands of indie tracks because of alleged artificial-stream violations. However, thousands of the impacted artists maintain that they didn’t pay for streams and are demanding that the Stockholm-based platform reinstate their music. Moreover, it doesn’t appear that there’s a way to determine whether a creator personally paid for fake streams (or whether another party did so – possibly without the musician’s knowledge).

Separately, the major labels are engaged in courtroom confrontations with several stream-ripping websites, or platforms that allow users to download files containing videos’ audio. Hartford-based Yout is currently suing the RIAA in a much-publicized lawsuit centering on YouTube’s “rolling cipher” technology, while stream-ripping giant FLVTO.biz officially petitioned the Supreme Court in its high-profile Supreme Court case.

The latter suit raises interesting jurisdictional questions, for the RIAA levied the complaint in a Virginia federal court, and Tofig Kurbanov, owner of the Russia-based FLVTO.biz, emphasized in his petition that he hasn’t visited the United States – or even advertised his website specifically in the country. About 90 percent of FLVTO.biz’s traffic is attributable to users outside of America, also according to the petition.

 


Digital Music News’ continuing coverage of Intellectual Property Protection and Litigation is sponsored by Pro Music Rights.

One Response

  1. Avatar
    Wrong Again Dylan

    Sending this on to the officer investigating you
    The Music machine uses these companies to pad signed artists social networking numbers. You’ve completely failed to report of investigate this your just a parrot DMN.

    There is MAJOR PAYOLA and the artists know it because the labels have been making the artists pay for these services.

    Dylan watch Unwine with Tasha K. Just last night she released a video of an artist’s who is signed to Cardi B’s label and she STATES VERY CLEARLY she worked to get her song viral on Tic Toc she went to her label who had shelved her because she wouldn’t sign away publishing rights to be on Wilin Out … she STATES I knew I went big so I called them to get my streaming money they called me in the office and handed me a bill. She states very clearly they had plaid for listens they paid for her to get up on billboard and they wanted her to pay them back!

    There are COUNTLESS public accusers but DMN is complicit in fraud because you fail to do basic due diligence and just write these pieces with NO RESEARCH OR REPORTING!!!