3 Major Problems With the Music Modernization Act

3 Major Problems With the Music Modernization Act
  • Save

Can the Music Modernization Act truly treat independent songwriters and composers fairly?

What exactly does the Music Modernization Act do?  According to multiple politicians as well as music organizations, the bill will simplify digital licensing and increase royalty payments to rights holders.  In addition, it would solve a host of previous lawsuits mostly aimed at streaming music platforms.  With rights holders earning more money, the bill seems like a win-win for independent songwriters and composers, right?

Well, not really.

First, if passed, the bipartisan legislation would shut down any potential legal claims for unpaid mechanical royalties.  That would explain why Spotify loves the bill.  This also explains why Wixen Music Publishing filed a $1.6 billion lawsuit against the music giant right after Christmas.

The bill would shut legal claims not filed before January 1st, 2018.  As attorney Richard Busch explained in a guest post on Digital Music News,

Limiting damages retroactively if a lawsuit has not yet been filed may very well be unconstitutional.  It also seems patently unfair to basically retroactively absolve Spotify of infringement damages, and willful infringement at that, just because a victim has not yet filed a lawsuit.

Second, the bill would hurt indie songwriters as well as independent musicians.  While organizations like ASCAP and the NMPA support the bill, many songwriters and musicians have cried foul.  Lambasting support for the bill, many told Digital Music News last month,

The NMPA doesn’t care about statutory damages because they already got paid.  So they’re happy to give them up.

Now, one music organization has spoken up against the bill.  In a video published on YouTube, the Council of Music Creators has listed the three major problems it has with the bill.

Reason #1:  The Music Modernization Act will set up an unbalanced board.

The Council of Music Creators agrees with the basic concept of the Music Modernization Act.  Yet, it disagrees with the creation of a new board.

The board will control how the bill gets implemented.  Ten music publishers along with only four writers will sit on the board.  Most of the money, claims the organization, belongs to writers.  US songwriters won’t choose who would best represent them.  Instead, if passed, the ten music publishers would decide which writers would sit on the board.

What solution exists?  Simple.  Songwriters should choose which writers would best represent them.  Music publishers should do the same.

Reason #2:  100% of unclaimed royalties will go to publishers based on market share.

On digital music services, self-published and unpublished writers will most likely face issues with song identification, or the lack thereof.  Due to copyright registration issues, incomplete data, or misspellings on their songs, independent songwriters could lose out on royalties.  Should they fail to collect their royalties from the collective, music publishers will get 100% of their unclaimed royalties.  The Council of Music Creators claims that major publishers and their top writers will get most of that money.

The solution?  Amend the bill to allow self-published and unpublished writers to claim their royalties should they encounter these issues.

Reason #3:  The Music Modernization Act doesn’t contain a grievance process for independent songwriters.

Right now, the Music Modernization Act doesn’t have a grievance process for excluded writers and those who receive unjust treatment.  Major songwriters who can afford lawyers and accountants could audit their publishers.  Tens of thousands of songwriters who can’t, won’t.

How could lawmakers fix this oversight?  The bill should include a grievance process that would allow an independent party to address ordinary songwriters’ issues.

So, what’s next?

The organization admits that other issues exist in the Music Modernization Act, including the definition of a music creator.  Should lawmakers fix these three issues, the Council of Music Creators believes that the bill would provide fair treatment for everyone.

You can check out the complete video below.



Featured image by EFF Images (CC by 2.0)

One Response

  1. Remi Swierczek

    Soviet Union 5 year plan revisited by lost and confused MUSIC industry NERDS and CORRUPTED DC SWAMP!

    Music industry needs just NEW FAIR USE ACT – next day it will be locked up from Google and Apple/Shazam PIMPS and can become merchandise again.

    Let’s do it and convert next day 150,000 Radio and TV stations, 5,000,000 busy public spots and 7 streaming NUTS on Ek’s DOPE to primitive traditional music stores w/ $300B i revenues before 2030.

    Play the best, sub and ad free, and charge for addition to personal playlist.