Black Singer Lady A Says She Was “Intimidated” and “Bullied” — “Lady Antebellum Has Erased Me From Every Platform”

  • Save

Anita White has published her first public statement on the controversy – and lawsuit – stemming from her high-profile battle over the “Lady A” title.

To quickly recap, the much-publicized episode began about one month ago, when Nashville-based country group Lady Antebellum – now known as Lady A – dropped the “antebellum” portion of its name. Soon after unveiling the change, the band was confronted by the original Lady A, a 61-year-old blues singer who’s performed and created music under the title for decades.

Both Lady As promptly discussed the future of the name, with Anita White suggesting that she adopt the “Lady A the Singer” moniker while the three-piece group utilized “Lady A the Band.” Unfortunately, these talks fell through without any semblance of a deal – a point that the band formerly known as Lady Antebellum attributed to a $10 million demand from Anita White. Maintaining that it has possessed the “Lady A” trademark for a nearly a decade, the new Lady A then filed a lawsuit against White.

The Seattleite refrained from addressing the matter publicly until late last week, when she participated in an interview. Now, however, the original Lady A has released a comprehensive statement on the subject. In the roughly 800-word-long message, White doubles down on the idea that “co-existence will simply not work” in terms of her and the band’s sharing the Lady A name. Additionally, Lady A alleges that the former Lady Antebellum “has used their wealth and influence to intimidate and bully me into submission without offering any real recompense for appropriating my name.”

Here’s the full statement from Anita White:

Statement from Anita White. The real Lady A.
Black Lives, Names, Experiences, Work, Art – They All Matter.

“I first heard about Lady Antebellum’s planned name change after they went public on June 11, 2020, at which point I was shocked and taken aback. During initial calls with the members of the band—Hillary Scott, Charles Kelley, and Dave Haywood—I hoped that we could reach an agreement that left both sides whole. Lady Antebellum understood that their use of ‘Antebellum’ was offensive and that their adoption of Lady A harms me, as I have been using the name professionally for over 30 years.

Though they recognized their impact, Lady Antebellum has not been receptive to my proposals for correcting their infringement, unfortunately. It has already been demonstrated why co-existence will simply not work. My fans used to be able to listen to my music on streaming services; now they struggle to find me. Due to Lady Antebellum’s massive rebranding efforts, Lady Antebellum has erased me from every platform. Lady Antebellum has used their wealth and influence to intimidate and bully me into submission without offering any real recompense for appropriating my name. It is now clear that their apologies, friendly texts, and playing on my love of God were just insincere gestures aimed at quieting me. Well, I will not be quiet any longer.

After being called out for taking my name, Lady Antebellum and their team of publicists and attorneys are doing what many folks of privilege do when asked to cease and desist bad behavior. Hillary, Charles, and Dave are attempting to change the narrative by minimizing my voice and belittling my experience as an artist — as if having a lot of money gives them permission to tread on my rights. I have worked too long and too hard to just give my name away.

The band’s decision to change their name to Lady A follows the trend of many other groups and organizations working to distance themselves from racism in the wake of the uprisings in this post-George Floyd world. Someone finally told them — or perhaps they knew all along and didn’t care until now — that their name reminds Black folks of just how much was taken from us in the past: our lives, freedom, languages, families, and, yes, our names. It is absurd that Lady Antebellum has chosen to show its commitment to racial equality by taking the name of a Black woman, particularly in this time when we are reminded every day to “Say Her Name.” It is one more demonstration of what continues to be taken away from us in the present. Given the way that Hillary, Charles, and Dave have treated me, I am not surprised that they used the name Lady Antebellum for so long or that their cure is to adopt a name that is only less overtly racist. The A in their name stands for Antebellum and always will. If they are truly committed to racial equality, why do they want to maintain that association, especially when it means making a public, intentional stand to disregard me and my rights?

Lady A is my identity — and it has been since 1987. I want to be able to freely use my brand that I spent decades building. I do not want to part with it. It is particularly painful to me, as a Black woman, to lose my name in THIS time and place so Lady Antebellum can use it as shorthand to celebrate a time and place connected to and very heavily reliant upon slavery. I asked for $5 million to compensate me for this loss, and to help me rebuild under a new name. I also asked that they donate $5 million to a charity so that we could work together to promote racial equality. It was my impression from our communications that this would appeal to Hillary, Charles, and Dave. I guess I was wrong.

Their refusal to come to an agreement that would be respectful of my work and my rights, however, has given me the clarity and the drive to not back down. Black lives, names, experiences, work, art — they all matter. Fellow independent artists have reached out to me to share their stories of name feuds that they lost because they were on the opposite side of big money and privilege. Not only will I not be one of them, but I am hopeful that this fight for what is rightfully mine will help those damaged by this type of bullying and erasure in the past, and that it will prevent it from happening in the future. I will not allow Lady Antebellum to obliterate me and my career so they can look ‘woke’ to their fans.”

9 Responses

  1. Al Jolson

    Rich white liberals devour another black person. Democrats have been doing this for decades. Glaring white privilege, yet because they are liberals they get a pass.

    Note to blacks: you may disfavor Trump, but Democrats are not your friends and will eat you alive given the chance.

    • Olive

      Zzzz. Repeat and repeat were up in a tree…you’re just a broken record of bullshit lies and falsehoods.

        • Olive

          That was a really dumb comment. I was obviously replying to Al Jolson. Oh, you were trying to make a joke and a point which was neither funny nor made sense. Back to the old drawing board for you. Fail

    • Anonymous

      You Trumpers make everything about Reps vs Dems. Blue vs Red.

  2. Berry

    This isn’t about races. It is big record company stealing other small musicians’ career. Check out their label, i.e. Big Machine.

    These industry garbage serve capital/money, not a particular color. And these clowns playing instruments are merely monkeys who want some dramas to boost their streams.

  3. PJ Wassermann

    I hope for the black lady to win this case.

  4. Wokeface McGee

    Whoa there. “THEY all matter”??? Them’s cancellin’ words, Anita.

  5. AB

    Isn’t the answer simple – this is why you trademark your name. Lady A did it 10 years ago, thus they have the legal right to the name, end of story.